User talk:Grafikm fr/Archive4

Novels newsletter
Thanks for doing that - nearly perfect - I did notice the user:Grey Shadow only got the link version rather than his requested "Full version". Small matter but I thought you might like to know. Thanks again. :: Kevinalewis  :  (Talk Page) / (Desk)  13:11, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for September 5th.


You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:25, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Ghirlandajo
I am glad to see you say that you have advised Ghirlandajo on his behavior before. It seems to me that we agree there is a problem but we merely disagree as to the solution.

I do grant you that Ghirlandajo has toned it down recently. I was pleasantly surprised to find that there were not as many incidents in the last month or two as I had expected.

Certainly it would be best for everyone if Ghirlandajo would take advice from his friends such as you. But now the ArbCom case has already been filed. Currently I feel a little warning from ArbCom may help motivate Ghirlandajo. However, if you feel threats would only alienate Ghirlandajo I am prepared to be convinced.

I feel the most important thing is to get Ghirlandajo to talk about it and acknowledge there is a problem. We simply can't make any progress if he feels we have no right to complain.

I do understand that Ghirlandajo is a major asset to Wikipedia and we would suffer immensely if he left. But if we can't discuss our differences then we can't work together.

I'm asking you, no I'm begging you, to help establish a dialogue with Ghirlandajo. Help him understand that Cowman, or I, or someone else who understands the issues, does not have to be an enemy. (watchlisted you) --Ideogram 14:53, 6 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The problem appears to have solved itself. Thank you for whatever you did or didn't do.  --Ideogram 07:59, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Please explain
What does "procès d'intention" mean? --Ideogram 10:43, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

When you are back
When you are back please see Talk:Second_Rzhev-Sychevka_Offensive --Philip Baird Shearer 23:47, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Good luck
On break? Well, that explains things! ;-)

In any case, good luck with the exams! Kirill Lokshin 01:42, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for September 11th.


You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:25, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for September 18th.


You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:42, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

My plugin
Hi. I see in recent changes that you're using my plugin. A couple of points:
 * You need to change your edit summary, as it currently says "clean up" (the AWB default) :) Change it to something short and sweet like "Bot". Unfortunately AWB insists that the edit summary box contain something otherwise I'd do it all programatically!
 * In the last few minutes I released a new version which will remove importance= parameters from MILHIST templates. It's no big deal but you might want to grab that version, up to you.

--kingboyk 22:08, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

PD Soviet pictures et al
Are you back? It seems one of these German deletionists is opening a second front:. That is the same guy who is currently trying to get the Reichstag picture deleted on Commons:. Funnily, he is invoking the fact that there is no panorama freedom in France. Personally, I think that since these statues are government property on a government site, there is no reason here to even invoke panorama freedom. So, like with the Reichstag flag picture they are mixing up German law with the law of the country of origin to construct a possible copyright infringement. But I do not know French copyright law. If you are also active on French Wikipdia, do you know anyone there who knows the French law so that, if this is indeed a new bout of lunacy, it can be stopped? --Pan Gerwazy 22:22, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Re: Adzhimushkay
Meh, names don't always make sense. ;-)

"Quarry" (or perhaps "quarries") is a more accurate translation of the Russian name, and hence seem to be the one more commonly used in English; I'm sort of hesitant to simply make something up just because it seems more sensible. (Not to mention that "catacombs" has a somewhat different sense in English than it does in Russian.) In any case, though, I'll leave the choice of name up to your discretion. Kirill Lokshin 18:58, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

100th Guards Rifle Division
Any input here would be highly appreciated; we don't know quite what to do with this thing. ;-) Kirill Lokshin 19:07, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

In all fairness
It's absolutely true that Tony Sidaway did make this edit calling another editor something unprintable, but four minutes later he removed it as "not helpful". I wonder if it might be better to withdraw that from the page rather than draw attention to it? David | Talk 21:59, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Please help
Sorry to bother you, but as an Inclusionist wikipedia things are getting desperate and I need to appeal to your for help. We are facing a situation where a deletionist admin is free to declare inclusionist arguments "absurd" and ignore them at will. If you don't agree with this situation, please share your opinion here. Kappa 02:25, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

September newsletter
Is ready. Assuming you don't notice anything horribly wrong with it, the bot can probably send it out. Thanks! Kirill Lokshin 02:27, 26 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Great work, as usual! Kirill Lokshin 23:19, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Battle of Krasnoi
Hi, could you please do me a favour and take a look at the Battle of Krasnoi? There is a war between User:UberCryxic and a newbie, User:Kenmore. The latter started the page but, after UberCryxic's uncooperative edits, blanked the page in frustration. Could you mediate some sort of solution in this content dispute? -- Ghirla -трёп-  07:49, 26 September 2006 (UTC)


 * I am glad to know that Ghirlo is up here giving us the most unbiased reports of what's happening (*rolling eyes*). Anyway, there are still some problems with this page Grafik. And now they're major: two versions of the article are emerging and I believe Kenmore has the idea that the top part is "mine" and the bottom part is "his," though I am not exactly sure what he is thinking. All I know is that he is not letting me edit "his part" of the article. I know Kenmore is trying to help and be productive, but my attempts (and those of Kirill as well) to make him understand the policies of Wikipedia have failed. He wrote things in my talk page like:


 * Don't change my written words...please keep your contributions to the article at the top, in the space that Grafikim reserved for you to write your version of Krasnoi.


 * I know you like to see pro-French perspectives on 1812…wait until I finish my upcoming Berezina River article. That battle I judge to be (generally) a French victory. I plan to discuss it in detail later on.


 * I call these battles as I see them…Krasnoi I give to the Russians, Berezina I give to the French.


 * This is blatant POV pushing (and an odd attempt to strike a deal with me? Berezina is actually a Russian victory, but again I don't know what he's thinking), but the problem is that he will not understand that unless he is familiar with Wikipedia's policies and actually respects them. What do you think we can do about this? I want to address this issue now before Kenmore's edits impact other articles. I believe he can be a very constructive editor, but right now he is behaving in a strange manner.UberCryxic 19:28, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for September 25th.


You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:56, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Hey
Hey Grafikm, thanks for your intervention at Krasnoi. I just wanted to say that it is fine to advise people to be cool - everyone should - but although well-meaning, it is also slightly disingenuous to give us the same warning in the same tone. Kenmore has carried out some vicious personal attacks against me and for the most part I've ignored them (or haven't replied back in the same sense). Yes, this is a defense of myself. I feel like your warning would be more appropriate if it were directed at him, not both of us. Thanks anyway though.UberCryxic 13:00, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Feedback for essay
Hi, there. I have made some large changes to the essay now known as Administrators are not only here to build the encyclopedia (I renamed it as the original title deviated too much from my original point). I would like some feedback on whether you find it more acceptable now. Thanks. Cowman109 Talk 18:44, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history Newsletter - Issue VII - September 2006
The September 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by Grafikbot - 19:16, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history Newsletter - Issue VII - September 2006
This is an automated delivery by Grafikbot - 20:22, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

For how much you added to the article, and how quickly you did so...

 * I still think you deserve it. Also, by the way, it's the first barnstar I've given out and I've been here for like 10 months. &mdash;  Ed Gl  22:19, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Content change at Kiev Offensive
Making sweeping edits that skew an article's NPOV with selective historical interpretations that are contradicted by a number of sources isnt the right way to go either. Reichenbach 12:15, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Discussion at relevant page talks. Reichenbach 12:52, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Re:Polish-Soviet War
I have not broken the 3RR rule. Feel free to show me specific edits where I broke it, though.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 01:01, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

French Military
Were you ever in the French military? MonkBirdDuke 02:25, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Fred's analogy
Common edible mushrooms are grown in the dark on "mushroom soil", a mixture of horse manure, straw, and some other odds and ends. Hence the analogy to dysfunctional processes where people are kept uninformed (in the dark) or lied to (horseshit). (I grew up in the principal mushroom-cultivating region of the US, BTW, where the evidence is...inescapable.) HTH, Choess 05:21, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Aleksandr Vasilevsky
Great work on and congratulations for getting it to the Main Page. Cheers! -AED 06:46, 30 September 2006 (UTC)


 * I echo the congrats on making the front page! I just glanced at the photo and thought, "Hey, I know him!"  :) --ScreaminEagle 09:13, 30 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Congratulations on some excellent work on Aleksandr Vasilevsky. Just out of interest (I'm at present working on a way of reducing the space footnotes take up), what was your principle of when to footnote vertically and when to do the abcde horizontal style? Was it because the latter were all from a small section of a book?. Once again, very impressive! qp10qp 12:16, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the kind words, all of you! :) Qp10qp, I'll reply you seperately on the subject of references on your talk page. :D -- Grafikm  (AutoGRAF)  15:03, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Vasilevsky image
I have a quick question about this image in the article,, or rather the caption that goes with it. Are you listing the names in order of rank/importance or in a left-to-right manner? I would think most people would expect the names to be presented left-to-right (especially if they're unfamiliar with the parties by sight), in which case the caption would read "Vasilevsky, Rokkosovskiy, and Stalin, etc.," yes? Just something that caught my eye. --ScreaminEagle 20:07, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Project awards
Are you still intending to do more drafts for them, or should we just wrap up the discussion for the time being? :-) Kirill Lokshin 08:04, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Where to request help from WP:MILHIST members?

 * Crossposted to User talk:Wandalstouring

Hello, I see you are a coordinator on WP:MILHIST so I reckon you are a right person to ask this: I need attention from WP:MILHIST community on Mirko Norac article, where do I request such attention? --Dijxtra 13:39, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Ooook. I saw that you have a whole bunch of subpages, so I thought I'm supposed to go to some subpage. But, OK, I'll post a notice here: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history. Thanks! --Dijxtra 13:57, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Chevron
The chevron in your user page is cool so I copied it for myself.UberCryxic 22:32, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Russian/Soviet/Eurasian military history
Might you have any thoughts on creating a Russian military history task force (under any name, really)? :-) Kirill Lokshin 19:57, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for October 2nd.


You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:28, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Piłsudski
Per your comments of MilHist, could you try your hand at NPOVing the article? I am now reading a bio of Piłsudski (per my latest changes to the article), but it seems so far to be rather positive.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 21:50, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Request
Hey, my latest FA attempt is not getting many reviews for some reason. Would you mind taking a look at it and telling me what you think? Thank you.UberCryxic 23:09, 3 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Hey, I tried to address your concerns. Can you take another look? Thanks!UberCryxic 15:55, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Kenmore & the Battle of Krasnoi
Sorry to bother you with this again, but any assistance you could provide with this issue would be very appreciated! Thanks! :-) Kirill Lokshin 20:40, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter
Time for another Novels newsletter issue "October 2006" if you can manage it please. :: Kevinalewis  :  (Talk Page) / (Desk)  12:45, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue V - October 2006
The October 2006 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot -- 14:02, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue V - October 2006
The October 2006 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot -- 20:13, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue V - October 2006
This is an automated delivery by grafikbot -- 20:55, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for October 9th.


You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 16:48, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

RfB With A Smile :)


Grafikbot
Your request at Bots/Requests for approval/Grafikbot was approved, however, it was noted that you did more than was approved by the trial and you did not post your results or wait for final approval. Please resolve this procedure problem in the future, or else the bot will not be approved and may be blocked. -- RM 12:52, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Crossing_the_Dnieper.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Crossing_the_Dnieper.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 06:41, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Military history Collaboration of the Fortnight
You supported Tank, which has been selected as the Military history WikiProject's new Collaboration of the Fortnight. Please help improve this article to featured article standards. Kirill Lokshin 00:28, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Russian military history again
So, what do you make of the discussion here? In particular, I'd be very interested in your opinion on (a) whether "Russian and Soviet" would be workable, and (b) whether broader calls for participation from the relevant outside groups could be done without provoking a political fight. (Sorry for bugging you about this, but I think that you're the person most likely to have some idea of what the general sentiment might be. ;-) Kirill Lokshin 20:17, 16 October 2006 (UTC)


 * RUSSIAN MILITARY HISTORY


 * For many years I have been reading a great deal about Russian military history, going back over centuries. I would like to be part of the Russian military history task force, either writing articles or sharing my sources and assisting others writing articles. Contact me with any questions or comments.


 * Thanks.


 * Kenmore 13:43, 18 October 2006 (UTC)kenmore

Signpost updated for October 16th.


You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 17:49, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

edit of article chirnivtsi oblast
Please, do not revert from a newer version to an older one. Please, if you have observations, list them point by point. I would be very happy to discuss them. I agree the article needs more clean-up. Maybe we should start another item or two, move some edits there, and introduce links to them. What do you think?

Thank you
My administratorship candidacy succeeded with a final tally of 81/0/1. I appreciate your support. Results are at Recently_created_admins. Warmly,  Durova  21:09, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

what?
whar r u talking about? what's personal attack. Sosomk 18:50, 18 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Do u get to define it? Sosomk 18:51, 18 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Yeah, dude I saw that you deleted "Russian POV pusher. Oppresser of E European users, who discriminates users on national basis" The poin of my question is that Y is that an attack. Ghirl and his gang is attacking nearly all articles about Gerogian political cuture, history and etc and they treat me like crap [[Talk:Sukhumi]] and calling him POV pusher is an attack, heh;) hat's just not right. Sosomk 18:54, 18 October 2006 (UTC)


 * There nothing Racial and homophobic or ethnic attacks in that. Russia itself is a large and ethnically diverse country and I did say saything about his ethnic background. He is a pro-Russian POV pusher''. Sosomk 18:57, 18 October 2006 (UTC)


 * allright, I have lived in Geo for most of my life and I don't even know what the heck the city is called, right. How do you know whats the best way to call in English. Ur native tongue in not even English. In addition, u can't even defien what ur doing and agument on my talk page makes no sense, so take it easy. Sosomk 19:00, 18 October 2006 (UTC)


 * In English speaking world there is a thing called Encyclopedia Brittanica[] and Encarta Enclopedia,[] which have more authority than Wikipedia in an acadeic world. In addition, according to the CIA it is also Sokhumi[]. Maybe that's ery tough for a semi-Russian French man to understand the correct spelling, since even french don't know how to spell stuff in their own language. Sosomk 19:10, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Requests for arbitration/MONGO
This case is now closed and the results have been published at the link above.

and are banned indefinitely from Wikipedia. No action is taken against MONGO for any excessive zeal he has displayed. Links to Encyclopædia Dramatica may be removed wherever found on Wikipedia as may material imported from it. Users who insert links to Encyclopædia Dramatica or who copy material from it here may be blocked for an appropriate period of time. Care should be taken to warn naive users before blocking. Strong penalties may be applied to those linking to or importing material which harasses other users.

For the Arbitration Committee. Arbitration Committee Clerk, FloNight 03:31, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Smiley
Just wanted to give you this since I noticed that you were the prime defender of images in the case with Lupo. Seeing how you have done such wonderful work on Russian articles already I just wanted to say (being half russian myself) that your work is very appreciated! - Tutmosis 15:43, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

badgering
I find your badgering of people on khoikhoi's rfa to be wholly distasteful and would request that you stop and possibly apologize. People are entitled to vote any way they like, for any reason they like. They do not have to prove to you or to anyone the reason they voted one way or another. ... aa:talk 17:39, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Sosomk
Please note that, per CheckUser and WP:SOCK policy, I can only perform a CheckUser or block a sock if there is evidence the sockpuppet is being used abusively. Sockpuppets are not themselves prohibited. in this case, with no contributions, I can't conclude it is abusive. Dmcdevit·t 19:41, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Muchas gracias


Hey Grafikm, thanks a lot for supporting me in my recent RfA. It succeeded, and I am very grateful to all of you. If you ever need help with anything, please don't hesitate to ask. Also, feel free point out any mistakes I make! Thanks again, &mdash; Khoikhoi 04:01, 21 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Also, thanks for all that other help too. :-) &mdash; Khoikhoi 04:01, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Holodomor
Dear Wheatcroftian Friend:

Please read Mace, Kulchytsky, Shapoval,Graziosi, Simon, Serbyn, Subtelny, Pachlovska; etc etc etc!

All the best!

a History teacher 10:05, 21 October 2006 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by LuisMatosRibeiro (talk • contribs)

Featured article candidates/History of Solidarity
"I'm stopping here but there are some other examples as well in the text" - I've addressed the issues you raised, feel free to continue. Constructive criticism is always appreciated.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 16:14, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Participants in World War II
I saw your request in requests for page protection. Although you did okay, it's that you didn't put either (in bold) "full protection", "semi-protection", "move protection", or more than one request for only one page. --Gh87 18:42, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Russophobia picture
You are asking me to quote a passage, read the talk page. Also asking for english references is unfair, considering the fact that the picture comes from a russian language website. - Lapinmies 14:54, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for October 23rd.


You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:21, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

RE

 * Removing other people's comments from discussions threads is almost considered vandalism, except in the case they are obvious ad hominem attacks. -- Grafikm  (AutoGRAF)  12:13, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Removing legitimate tags warning an assaulter also qualifies as such.--Constanz - Talk 12:16, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I objected to Ghirla's assaults: 'airing russophobic statements', accusing me and others of tentdentious editing (in portal page not so mild word etc.)[]. I warned him that he may be blocked, if he continues with this style. Nothing disgusting regarding my notification, I'm afraid (so far, I have not been blocked for this problem. May'be I'm unqualified on the matter).--Constanz - Talk 12:24, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Pity you don't comment on Ghirla's accusations on Talk page mentioned. Also, he was waging a one against all battle on the article concerned, and as for trolling - I retain, that there is a remarkable threat, as the block lists warn me.


 * the block lists suggest my claim is substantiated
 * Ghirla has been blocked for trolling
 * Isn't it against wikipedia rules to take advantage of a portal with the aim of gathering pseudeconsensus (almost similar to voting fraud??)
 * I don't object to mentioning disputed articles, but his way of summarising it might and should be deleted.

I really believe that you, in case you were to appear as a neutral negotiator, should have talked to Ghirla first, because it was his edits, that raised my concerns (I'm not an active participant on the Georgia-Russia dispute article)Constanz - Talk 12:30, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Partisans
Grafik, thanks for the rewording, it's much better now. On the other hand, what do you think of my idea? IMHO we actually do not need a separate introduction for that section, it reads even better without it. What do you say?  // Halibutt 21:24, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

announcements
Hi, just to let you know, announcements on portals are allowed under WP:SPAM. Errabee 14:48, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

October newsletter
Is ready; could you please have the bot send it out? Thanks! Kirill Lokshin 17:03, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue VIII - October 2006
The October 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 21:32, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue VIII - October 2006
This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 22:49, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Truthseeker 85.5
I've restored his user page talk warnings, blocked him for three days, and asked him to consider why this happened and how he could change his behavior. (Cross-posted at WP:AN/I) RyanG e rbil10 (Упражнение В!) 13:57, 26 October 2006 (UTC)


 * And thank you for that resounding note of confidence! RyanG e rbil10 (Упражнение В!) 14:34, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Paris
Hello. Since you are from Paris, could you lead to me a good real estate site with rich offers and broad search options? Sorry for the OT. Reichenbach 19:12, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Thank you

 * Oh my... *blushes*.. Thanks to both of you :)) -- Grafikm  (AutoGRAF)  20:24, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Request
Hey, there is a dispute in the Charles de Gaulle aircraft carrier article (see talk page) and I would like your opinion on how the involved parties should proceed. Specifically, there are some contentions about sources towards the end that we need analyzed. Thank you so much!UberCryxic 04:27, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for October 30th.


You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:16, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Unblock
Please see my message; here, and here. Regards Mustafa Akalp TC 09:43, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Unsolicited notice
Hi, I've just received an unsolicited notice from a bot (User:Grafikbot) that is apparently operated by you. Could you explain why you are doing this? It's easy enough for me to obtain the information you disclose, should I wish to. Why are you spamming? --Rose Palmer 01:01, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter
Time for another Novels newsletter issue "November 2006" if you can manage it please. :: Kevinalewis  :  (Talk Page) / (Desk)  12:07, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter: Issue VI - November 2006
The November 2006 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 21:15, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter: Issue VI - November 2006
This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 22:02, 1 November 2006 (UTC)