User talk:GrahamHMay

Welcome!
Hello, GrahamHMay, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!  ミーラー強斗武   (StG88ぬ会話) 04:28, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rachel Blaney


The article Rachel Blaney has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Wgolf (talk) 15:47, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

March 2015
Hello, I'm Wgolf. I noticed that you removed a Biographies of Living Persons PROD and I wanted to let you know that I have replaced it. Please don't remove these Biographies of Living Persons PRODs from articles unless they contain at least one reliable source or were created before 18 March 2010. If you oppose the deletion of an article under this process, please consider adding reliable sources to the article or commenting at the respective talk page. Thank you. Wgolf (talk) 19:30, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing out these problems, WGolf. I've worked to make the page more integrated - five sources added now, which is quite a few for a page that is 1 day old. And as I said, I have solved the other problem you mentioned, but citing another wikipedia page to this page. If you have further concerns, let me know. -GrahamHMay

Nomination of Rachel Blaney for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rachel Blaney is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Rachel Blaney until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 19:31, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia!!
Hey Graham, I wanted to thank you for taking time to contribute to Wikipedia I'm really glad you're here, I did recommend deleting the article Rachel Blaney that I see you've worked on because I didn't feel the subject/topic met notability guidelines. if the article is or isn't deleted i don't want your experience here to be a negative one I think you are capable of great things here and if you ever have a question feel free to write in my talk page and ask, if I don't know the answer (which is sadly more likely than it probably should be) I'll find out for you. have a great week. Bryce Carmony (talk) 12:56, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Rachel A. Blaney for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rachel A. Blaney is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Rachel A. Blaney until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. FUNgus guy (talk) 15:52, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Rachel Blaney
Please note that Wikipedia's notability rules for politicians do not entitle a person to have an article on here just for being a candidate in an election — if you cannot make a compelling and properly sourced case that she already qualified for an article under one of our other inclusion rules, then she does not become notable enough for a Wikipedia article until she wins the election. We are not a venue for the publication of "campaign brochures" for unelected candidates — if she wins the seat on election night, then she'll be eligible for a Wikipedia article. Bearcat (talk) 15:03, 9 May 2015 (UTC)