User talk:Grahame5

I've added the "prod" template to the article Christine Leadman, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Christine Leadman. If you remove the dated prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Irongargoyle 16:38, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * You have recently re-created the article Christine Leadman, which was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not re-create the article. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may ask for a deletion review. Aecis I'm too busy acting like I'm not naive 16:57, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Aecis / Irongargoyle: I am new to contributing to Wikipedia and learning quickly. I appreciate the input received and would like to have a chance to work up a more encyclopedic article on a person from Ottawa. If I mistakenly created a second article, that was not my intention rather I wanted to edit what was there. Can I get this article restored so I may do the editing according to the guidelines? Grahame5
 * I cannot restore the article, as I am not yet an administrator. I suggest placing a message to this effect on Aecis or another wikipedia administrator's talk page. Best, Irongargoyle 18:00, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Ignore my previous comment. I see the article is restored, but it still does not appear that the subject meets the notability requirements biographies (see WP:BIO). I would anticipate that if there is no additional verifiable information regarding Christine Leadman and why she is notable added to the article, the article will be nominated for deletion again soon. Best, Irongargoyle 18:04, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Welcome aboard wikipedia, Grahame5. Always good to get some new faces around. The problem with the article on Christine Leadman is that she doesn't meet the notability guidelines set by Notability (people). She's still only a candidate for a position in local politics. Basically, that's not notable enough for wikipedia. If you have any further questions, concerning this article or concerning editing wikipedia in general, you can always leave a message at my talk page. You can sign your comments by using four ~'s, like so: ~ . Regards, Aecis I'm too busy acting like I'm not naive 18:05, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

A belated reply to your message at my talk page. I haven't restored anything, and I still believe that Christine Leadman is not notable enough. But to be fair, I've nominated it for deletion now, so that other wikipedians can judge the article as well. You are welcome to explain your point of view there as well. The nomination and discussion are at Articles for deletion/Christine Leadman. A ecis  I'm too busy acting like I'm not naive. 14:14, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:Christine Leadman 002.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:33, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Christine Leadman 002.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Christine Leadman 002.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly hi! 21:33, 21 May 2018 (UTC)