User talk:Grahamec/Archive 2

List vs Start
Point of curiosity, why do some motor racing event articles get classified as 'lists' and others as 'Start-class', eg: 2008 V8 Supercars Manufacturers Challenge‎ vs 1972 Chesterfield 250‎. --Falcadore (talk) 03:10, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Discouraged wikipedian
Hi - not sure anything can be doen or we can clairfy for him but User:Read-write-services seems a tad discouraged and feels picked on :-( I can't see how not to pick on him frankly and haven't the time (or inclination) to mentor him into newer directions. --Matilda talk 19:48, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Rating
Thanks for checking ratings. Paul foord (talk) 01:16, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I have done a quick first run for WikiProject Indigenous peoples of Australia and generally trust my judgment, I just had a glance at the bot reports, and there are some over-under ratings for both class & importance, not a lot though IMO. Where there is substantial disagreement on a rerating then some discussion may be needed. Paul foord (talk) 01:30, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Great Eastern Main Line
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Olana North (talk) 07:25, 1 April 2008 (UTC)


 * I have amended your unsourced addition, and replaced it with a properly sourced one. You may like to review my change and use it as an exmaple of a good edit.  I offer this example to you in order that you may compare them against your own edits and hopefully improve the quality of your edits through greater use on references and quoting sources. Olana North (talk) 08:14, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Formatting nav box
Do you know how to format a nav box, i.e. the nav box in an article will not be collapsed always, the nav box will be always fully displayed. I am trying to format the Template:Bridges in Slovenia for the article Dragon Bridge, so that the nav box is always displayed fully, not condensed, but the format is not working. This is the general format I know for nav boxes. But this is not working.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 13:27, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

John Wilton (Australian politician)
Hi. Not of any great importance, but I was wondering why you removed the "see also" section from John Wilton (Australian politician)? Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 13:34, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I figured you'd have a good reason. Thanks, Pdfpdf (talk) 13:45, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
 * P.S. Actually, I'm interested in the General, which led me to create the disambig page, which led to ... (You get the idea.) Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 13:45, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Magnoli*
G'day mate,

Be advised that "magnoliid", "Magnoliophyta", "Magnoliopsida", "Magnoliidae", "Magnoliales", "Magnoliaceae", "Magnolioideae" and "Magnolia" do not all refer to the same thing. They are distinct taxa/clades at different ranks. Specifically, Myrtales may be Magnoliophyta and even Magnoliopsida, but they are most definitely not magnoliids. Hesperian 03:15, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

1898 VFL Grand Final

 * Please have a look at 1898 VFL Grand Final. I hope it meets your requirements now, and I hope that you can remove your template, etc. Also, thanks for your comments. Lindsay658 (talk) 23:19, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Competitive Foods Australia
You might want to reassess the "low" rating of the article, as CFA is the largest operator of restaurants in the country. They have been involved in many legal cases, including some with BK and KFC, that have been precedent setting in Australia. They are also the official sponsors of several professional sports teams through their franchises.

--Jeremy ( Blah blah... ) 04:21, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

sugar man notability
Hi Grahamec,

I've updated Sugar Man (diabetes education) to provide more references... the PDF referenced was from a paper presented at a conference. I'm fairly new to all this but I feel like the post warrants notability... could you clarify for me?

thanks.

Meddance (talk) 02:21, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Back of Beyond
You are right - it is a bit listy and stubby in places. I will get back to it one day I promise, as I do have more info to work from!Sterry2607 (talk) 13:44, 22 April 2008 (UTC).
 * "Some day" probably being the moot point - but I would like to get back to it soon-ish. Am currently writing an article for ADB (coincidentally, actually, on two brothers, one of whom was the cinematographer for B of B.)Sterry2607 (talk) 23:36, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Fair go
The lead of In Melbourne Tonight says it was also known as IMT - where have you been?. But you are right, it should be stated fully. Cheers. Moondyne 13:04, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the tag on the Thalbourne article
I just wanted to thank you for the tag you put by the article I started on Michael Thalbourne. I shall admit that I was concerned that this article did not initially cite references, so I have now added some. I considered it important that Thalbourne had his own entry to go on the list of  Australian psychologists (I believe he is still at the University of Adelaide.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by ACEOREVIVED (talk • contribs) 21:22, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the tidy of Audax Australia article
Just a vote of thanks for the time you put in to tidying up our entry and thus giving us some invaluable knowledge. Skillsy (talk) 03:24, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Austral Society/Austral Halls
Thanks for adding the Clubs category tag to the Austral Society. I hadn't yet researched exactly what tag was appropriate. I am looking to add more info on 'Austral Halls around Australia' - but am still researching as I can find very few web references, except to a few scattered mentions of events in a few such halls. I personally remember using the one in Bundaberg, but it was later demolished to form a car yard - as many such halls were! I still don't know for sure if every Austral Hall was built by/for the Austral Society, or even if such a list is easily accessible. I may have to do the basic hard footslog and visit the various historical archives in Toowoomba, next time I am up that way for a while. Any hints/tips will be appreciated. Will copy this basic info to the AS talk page. FoolesTroupe (talk) 06:16, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Tags
If you are doing Demog tags - please remember to put the Demographics=yes in as well - thanks - cheers SatuSuro 06:34, 23 May 2008 (UTC) Apologies - it was a bulldozer push there - I do hope you werent crushed in the rush :( SatuSuro 06:56, 23 May 2008 (UTC) Sorry not clearly explained - I advised you the procedure - then proceeded to do them all myself (I have a strange sense of humour at times, sorry) - as for caps - I dont do formatting that aint me - the same thing goes for Tasmania - I suspect but am not sure that the templates might have a coding that would allow for upper and lower case - but I dont know how to work them - wish I knew but have never taken the time to pull one slowly apart by reverse engineering to work out how they work .- cheers SatuSuro 07:05, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Nighttrackers
I obviously have to read up on speedies - I thought this would be a prime candidate :( SatuSuro 07:50, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Hey enjoy! SatuSuro 07:57, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Marsupial Lion
A recent edit war concerning a page you recently edited (but may not have been involved with the war) is being resolved via a poll. If you have an opinion, please voice it now by voting at Talk:Thylacoleonidae. Bob the Wikipedian (talk) 20:08, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Willie Wagtail
Sorry, I was caught out by the gap between the promotion and the tagging of the closed discussion. Melburnian (talk) 14:41, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Re:Ivanova
I compared the version between my last edit and yours; there seems to be a lot of content removal in your version, so I'm not sure what exactly is going on. Then again, I doubt her middle name is Panda. There is something definitely amiss. CL — 07:34, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
 * So you're saying most of the information is fake? Should this be tagged for deletion? In any event, I'm not in a good state right now; sleep is necessary, after all :) CL — 07:43, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

The Dalek and Sydney Uni
Thanks for the clean up! MartinSFSA (talk) 05:21, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Sydney Harbour Bridge
Hi there Graham, was wondering whether you can help me by identifying if this edit here is vandalism/incorrect info. or not. Unfortunately i didn't really pay attention in history class when the opening of the bridge was talked about so hopefully you can help. The whole section under Opening does not cite any refs so its hard for me to judge so hopefully you can help. Thanks Monster Under Your Bed  (talk) 01:53, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Afd: Awesome Festival
Was wondering if you could take a minute to review the article and either withdraw or reconfirm your move for deletion. Ottre (talk) 15:55, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

McLean Family (rugby footballers)
Hi Graham. Noticed you removed the categorisation on the Redirects for Doug McLean snr and Doug McLean jnr. Perhaps there's policy on this matter but the reason for the categorisation is so that the individuals appear on the list Category:Dual code rugby internationals rather than having the family article name McLean Family (rugby footballers) which of course wouldn't be right. I know I could split the articles out but in my view part of their notability is the extraordinary family Wallaby connection and the family article makes this clearer. So is there a problem with me re categorising the Redirects ? - Sticks 66 12:14, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Other than to write two individual articles, can you give me a clue how I get those two players names onto the Category list. ?- Sticks 66 12:23, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Foster/Sturt/1969
Hi - where abouts did you find out that Foster won by only 50 votes? Timeshift (talk) 02:55, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I forgot AC's site had historic seat by seat results - thanks. I had a look, he won on 50.5% 2PP. 50 votes times 200 (0.5 goes in to 100.0 200 times) is only 10000, but there are 48000 formal votes in Sturt in 1969. I've amended the article slightly. Timeshift (talk) 03:22, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bay and Basin FM
Could you please take another look at Articles for deletion/Bay and Basin FM? It has been argued that almost all licensed radio stations including Bay and Basin FM are inherently notable. --Eastmain (talk) 17:02, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Project Banner
Thanks for tagging an article for the Novels WikiProject. Please be aware the Official banner is. Thanks :: Kevinalewis  : (Talk Page) /(Desk)  16:00, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * See Talk:The Brush-Off. Thanks :: Kevinalewis  : (Talk Page) /(Desk)  08:46, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * And another one Talk:The Malcontenta. Thanks :: Kevinalewis  : (Talk Page) /(Desk)  08:34, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
You've been adding projects to many pages, and it helps a lot. Thank you. Ottava Rima (talk) 13:28, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Latest AfD
Hi, is it too late to include Keith Taylor (author) in your latest AfD? Regards, WWGB (talk) 08:42, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Dang, someone has already responded to the Gillespie/Bangsund nom. WWGB (talk) 08:47, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Date of birth missing vs Year of birth missing
Hi. Please note that for article we use Category:Year of birth missing. If you need to add Category:Date of birth missing, you have to add it in the Talk page. Please read instructions given in these categories carefully. Thanks, Magioladitis (talk) 14:48, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Cams Manual
CAMS Manuals of Motor Sport, 1964 through 1984 - I'm fairly sure that the 1964 through to 1984 editions of the CAMS manual were not available online. --Falcadore (talk) 20:57, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Lazy articles should be deleted
Hi Grahame. I have a question about deletion of articles. I often see a pattern where an article is listed for deletion, as nothing in the article demonstrates notability, and the article carries no reliable references from mainstream sources to establish notability. Then, in the deletion discussion, someone pops up and says the subject is listed in various newspapers. So the article gets a "keep" vote. But the article then lies idle, and never gets updated with references. An example is Tallangatta & District Football League. A tag was added in April for references to be added. None were. The article got a "keep" vote. References still not added. There's nothing verifiable in the article, and despite the facts being challenged, it survives. Shouldn't the author of an article be responsible for referencing? Many times, people in the delete discussions say those voting to delete an article should look for references before voting. Shouldn't it be possible to delete an unreferenced article? Regards, -- Lester  06:46, 19 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Sorry to bring this up again. I'd like to contest the decision to allow the article Tallangatta & District Football League to be kept. Do you know the process to get this article reviewed? I read Deletion review, but that seems to be focused on getting deleted articles undeleted. Every piece of information in Tallangatta & District Football League is disputed, but the disputed information can't be removed as there would be nothing left.-- Lester  03:38, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

new article
Thanks for tagging this, I forgot to do it. I'm puzzled as to how you discovered that it needed doing. cygnis insignis 09:10, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Neat idea, there is a single mention Australia in the text. Thanks for the link. cygnis insignis 13:34, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Horrie Knight
Hi Graeme, thanks for editing this page. Dwayne —Preceding unsigned comment added by CortinaD (talk • contribs) 03:11, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

G'day
Hey mate, its probably a good idea to stick to arts and crafts rather than pursuing meaningless vendettas against local football clubs. Cheers CTDU (talk) 05:58, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Irene Roberts
"Restoring redirect"?What do you mean "restoring redirect"?You're the first person to redirect it!Skteosk (talk) 23:58, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Ah, sorry, I wasn't aware of that discussion from nearly three years ago. It still seems a shame that so much information has just been lost. The information on the character on the current characters page is pitifully brief.Skteosk (talk) 15:55, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Coords
I know, I am just lazy and figure it will give the the Anome bot something to do! :-) Besides, the ga.gov.au co-ords don't include seconds and as such for small towns often point to a location out of the town (see Mitiamo for an example). Cheers, Mattinbgn\talk 01:38, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for edit Mahulbanir Sereng--Jayanta Nath (talk) 12:06, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

(Yet another) sincere thank you
Thanks for your much appreciated guidance and assistance here!--Shirt58 (talk) 11:07, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Tim Flannery
Thanks Graham. Good advice. I've only rated one other article - one that I'd written myself - gave that one a C too! Will probably add myself to the list as you suggest. Cheers.GlenDillon 16:06, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Fulton and related arts - hmmm - self promoted with little understanding of wp:mos - check out his director at the pearce movie - almost deleted twice - interested that you ok them - when i first came across them i reckon speedies could got em all - oh well - good on ya for doing the slog - i noticed its the current acootf exercise - if you are ever interested i have over a 1,000 indonesian stubs of dubious quality that need tagging too :( - just joking SatuSuro 13:03, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

sorry i suspect that i have hit a nerve there - nah keep up the good work and sorry for bringing up the issue with fulton et al - in the end it is something i have to deal with some other time - and hey go to what you enjoy doing - youve done great stuff keeping the tabs on arts as it is - dont let my sense of humour get in the way SatuSuro 13:14, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

fair enough - the fulton, pearce film and his director arts were really getting to me as they were so full of repetition, and self promo and lack of wp:rs - ironically if I hadnt cleaned em up they would have been  still fodder for speedies - the big problem is i have neglected a number of dubious articles areas recently and going in and looking after seeing em being fiddled with has been depressing to see how really sloppy stuff isnt gtting challenged these days - anyways cannot you use online translator software to sort out german rail arts? SatuSuro 13:22, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

dont let me start - usually go hysterical when people either suggest or try to move indonesian articles across wikis - they dont know what a wp;rs is :( SatuSuro 13:42, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Fort Nepean
Thanks for the WPA rating. You may wish to review the Class as the article has been substantially expanded with additional references since you gave it a Start class. ShipFan (talk) 14:35, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Bathurst & Indy '08
Grahamec: Thanks for re-assessing the 2008 Bathurst and Indy articles, and for the bulk assessment of the burgeoning Australian Motorsport project. Just wanted your advice, the two articles both classified as C class, what needs improvement in your eyes to improve the classification of these articles? --Falcadore (talk) 22:24, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Flying Emus
I see you added a Indigenous Australian music groups category to Flying Emus. May I ask where this info comes from or was it based on my previous article creations? Thanks Duffbeerforme (talk) 10:54, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Darwin Rebellion
Hey there, I was wondering if you were interested in helping me get this article to GA status? It really needs someone with with very good copy editing skills to go over it and address the identified issues. I still have the book mainly referred to in the article by Frank Alcorta, but I need to return it to the library soon. Just let me know. Regards, Spy007au (talk) 12:48, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I really appreciate your help. Do you think it is close to GA status? Regards, Spy007au (talk) 13:09, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Finnegan, Parsons, Thompson articles
This is just a quick note to say I appreciate your contributions to my articles. I chose to post them just as they were, rather than waiting until I had fully developed them. This enables editors like yourself to come along and 'Wikify' them for me...!

Cheers --GaryB84 (talk) 02:39, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Export Control Act
Hey, thanks for adding the projects. I was wondering; what sort of image do you think would be appropriate for the article? - Arcayne   (cast a spell)  15:13, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

John A. Fraser (businessman)
Hi I am curious to your comments regarding my work on this bio. I am wondering if you have any tips for bio versus cv? I am trying to build the UBS bios as a project piece, and added this to ensure continuity from their management section. Have you anything to suggest? I am fairly new on here, so any help will be much appreciated.Catrandall (talk) 11:19, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your help - will endeavour to use these format tips.Catrandall (talk) 11:35, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

McGarvie Model
Could you please be more specific. The article is sourced from the two references. --Lawe (talk) 03:37, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Could you place discussion on the article's discussion page? --Lawe (talk) 04:00, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Thank you
For your vote at Roman Catholic Church. I am sorry to inform you that we failed FAC but will again be at peer review in a few weeks to sort things out. Hopefully we will make it through next time. We will be contacting all supporters and opposers of the article when we open the next peer review to hopefully get all issues addressed and hashed out before the next FAC try. Thanks again for your time and attention to this important article.  Nancy Heise    talk  01:13, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar
It's a huge relief to have finally got through the House of Reps, but the Senate stretches forbiddingly ahead. Thank you very much - it's great to know someone has noticed! Frickeg (talk) 03:45, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Remiss of me not to congratulate you on your work in Members of the Australian House of Representatives. Hopefully having articles for all the MPs will make life a bit easier there as well. Frickeg (talk) 03:55, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
 * And thanks for filling in the missing by-election. I thought I had the lot! Frickeg (talk) 22:06, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Not justifying your ratings
Whilst I am open to advice and direction, none of the pages (of mine) you have assessed include discussion as to how or why you have rated them or the work that you see that should be considered to improve.

You might be noticed for being a BarnStar - but you are being very unhelpful running around criticising and not justifying your criticisms.Sulzer55 (talk) 10:41, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Spy vs Spy
Thanks for updating the ratings - nice to know someone looks at these things - hate self-assessing my own work. Dan arndt (talk) 06:23, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

DYK credits
Hi Grahamec. It looks like you posted the article talkpage credits for Template:Did_you_know/Queue/4 about an hour an a half ago. However, it doesn't appear that the creators/nominators have been credited. Thanks. -- Suntag  ☼  02:49, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

DYK credits
You tagged the talkpages of the articles that were at DYK in this set, but didn't credit the individual contributors. I will do that now, but next time could you do that as well? See Template:Did you know/Queue/4. When you are done you can just post a note at WT:DYK. Thanks. Cirt (talk) 06:06, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

listas
I've fixed it (or at least I think I've fixed it: should it have a disambiguation, because there are other Ralph Andersons?) - Jmabel | Talk 17:55, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Rail transport in Germany project
Hi, A couple of months back, I arranged for a new project "Rail transport in Germany" to be set up and wondered if you'd like to join. I'm translating and adding articles regularly, but also trying to bring a bit of consistency and coherence to the categories and naming conventions etc. Would you be interested in joining? No pressure to do anything other than what you feel able to contribute.

One of the proposed conventions is to name German railways as "XXX railway" (referring to the German title in the intro). Do you mind if I move "Taunus-Eisenbahn" to "Taunus railway" on that basis? Regards. Bermicourt (talk) 13:38, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

That's great. All you need to do is add your name to the project page here: WikiProject_Trains/Rail_transport_in_Germany_task_force (you deserve to be there anyway looking at all the stuff you've already done!) and add stuff whenever you feel you have the time. Gruß, Bermicourt (talk) 09:27, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

WP:AUS 200 GA drive
Hi Gramhame. As you maintain WP:AWNB/A can you remember who this year's regular GA/GAN people are so that we can rally the troops for another GA drive? Thanks.  YellowMonkey  ( bananabucket ) 05:07, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks very much. I hope you will join us?  YellowMonkey  ( bananabucket ) 04:52, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Collin Mooney
Hi Graham, I see that you rated an article that I created and to which I am the primary contributor, Collin Mooney. You rated it as a C-class, but did not leave any comments. I was wondering if you could expand on why you rated it as such, in an effort to help me improve the article. Thanks! Strikehold (talk) 03:04, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Australia newsletter,December 2008
The December 2008 issue of the WikiProject Australia newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. This message was delivered by TinucherianBot (talk) 07:24, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

Last Drinks: The Impact of the Northern Territory Intervention
Hi Graham, and thanks for all the good work you do. But I am curious about what it takes for a book to get more than a "low" importance assessment for WP Australia. I really thought this one may have got "medium", since it won a Walkley Award. (It's obviously not a big issue but, as I say, I'm curious.) Johnfos (talk) 00:53, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Happy New Year!
Thanks for monitoring the noticeboard for us all!  YellowMonkey  ( bananabucket ) 04:44, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

B of the Bang
Hi. Thanks for reviewing the B of the Bang article. I've rewritten the introduction; would you be able to take another look and see if it's now up to GA quality? I'm afraid that I can't find anything on its "success in artistic terms" - I'm not actually convinced it's had any. Mike Peel (talk) 19:26, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks. :) Mike Peel (talk) 19:34, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Spy vs Spy (Australian band)
Hi Grahamec. I just logged a couple of assessment requests, and while I was there took a look at spy vs spy, which you'd re-rated as B class in November. I thought its punctuation was a bit wobbly, but otherwise thought it looked comprehensive enough for GA, and wondered if you had any other thoughts on what stood between it and GA status? Cheers. hamiltonstone (talk) 02:25, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Rudolf Wolters
Any hope of a picture of Rudi himself? I've tried Commons to no avail but its not really my area. (Images I mean). Fainites barley scribs 21:11, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks anyway. Fainites barley scribs 17:36, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Janszoon voyage of 1606
Hi, I have begun a review of your article Janszoon voyage of 1606 for GA and have left an initial comment at Talk:Janszoon voyage of 1606/GA1. If you can remove the templates so that I can made my way through the article, I would greatly appreciate it. Please feel free to contact me with comments or questions. Regards, &mdash; Mattisse (Talk) 02:04, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Congratulations on your first GA! I hope it is the first of many, the article is seriously good. In fact, is FA the next target? -- Mattinbgn\talk 01:33, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Well done, after you get the first one out of the way, things become really easily. I don't know whether it's psychological or a real skill development factor though. Enjoy,  YellowMonkey  ( bananabucket ) 01:41, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Have a chat with Graphic Lab/Image workshop; they should be able to sort out any map problems for you. -- Mattinbgn\talk 01:47, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Charles Grant Tindal
Heads up! You tagged this as an image copyvio while it was a piece of text (G12 instead of I9). Perhaps you should have some sleep ;) - Mgm|(talk) 11:50, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Invite to Canberra Meetup #2
--.../Nemo (talk • Contributions) 14:35, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Abdur Rahim (judge)
Thank you for assessing this. Umar Zulfikar Khan (talk) 07:06, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Glenbrook Lagoon
Hi. Thanks for catching the problem with Glenbrook Lagoon. The factual errors have been corrected. Could I ask you to withdraw your nomination so that the AFD can be closed? Regards. -- Whpq (talk) 11:47, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Angie Debo
Thank you very much for adding the WP:BIOG template and assessment at Talk:Angie Debo. I just realized that a WP:BLP notice came along with this template; is it OK with you if I change the template to indicate that she's deceased? Best regards--Arxiloxos (talk) 05:46, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

The Vincent Buckley Prize
Thanks Grahame for adding the other projects to this article. I'm not really up on all the projects. BTW Nice seeing you again on Saturday. Cheers, Sterry2607 (talk) 12:01, 10 February 2009 (UTC)


 * LOL I hadn't noticed that someone else had added the Ireland project. It's good having people out there picking this stuff up. As a result of your adding the Poetry one I discovered that I could add that to another Poetry Award article I created a while ago so that was good. I'm not sure who I was representing there on Saturday but it was good to be there under whatever guise!! Cheers, Sterry2607 (talk) 12:29, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Lighthouses
Thanks muchly Grahame. I've started 2 lighthouse articles because I like to photograph them when I see them (they are so photogenic) - but they are not my main passion here. If you have a good book and want to expand the articles I've started please go ahead.Sterry2607 (talk) 11:12, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

doppelgänger?
My shout all night at the pub if you start the articles Peter Corris and Labor Party Split before I do... --Shirt58 (talk) 12:59, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Photo request
Iain McCalman strikes me as an important national historian. He's speaking about his new book at the Darwin's Symposium, National Museum of Australia, on Thursday the 26th. Reckon you could get a photograph? Ottre 16:22, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Well? Ottre 14:55, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Don Chafin
Hi, you recently reviewed the article Don Chafin for WP:BIO, and gave it a C-class rating. While it's not my current top project, I'm hoping to eventually bring that article to GA status, and I was wondering what you thought the principal problems with it are; specifically, what would I need to improve to get to B-class? Thanks. Cool3 (talk) 21:30, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Borromeo String Quartet‎
Hi there. I noticed you placed a biography project template on the Talk:Borromeo String Quartet‎ page. The Borromeo String Quartet‎ is not a person so that really wasn't appropriate. I went ahead and removed the template. Please be more thoughtful in future.Nrswanson (talk) 13:22, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Declined speedy tagging
Hi there. Please remember that A9 cannot be applied to articles such as My New Life Begins because it additionally requires that the artist does not have a Wikipedia entry. Regards  So Why  10:06, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks
Hi,

Thankyou for the effort you put into your ratings. In my experience many of the people who rate articles do so on the basis of a cursory glance at the content. Your ratings regularly demonstrate that you have actually read the article and reflected on the material. Goodonyamate.

Hesperian 05:41, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Hajnal Ban
I added some references to Hajnal Ban. You may want to revisit Articles for deletion/Hajnal Ban. -- Eastmain (talk) 03:12, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Region of Shaba
An article that you have been involved in editing, Region of Shaba, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Frozenguild (talk) 12:36, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Lake Burley Griffin
Can you chip in as you are from the ACT. I don't know too much about the parts that I haven't already dealt with.  YellowMonkey  ( cricket calendar poll! ) 08:33, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks!  YellowMonkey  ( cricket calendar poll! ) 00:40, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

rollback
Hey Graham, I think I forgot to tell you (hmm, sorry about that!) that I added rollback to your account the other day. You can read about it on the WP:ROLLBACK page but the main rule is that it's only used for vandalism and "blatantly unproductive edits" and not in content disputes and such. I hope you find it helpful! Cheers, Sarah 15:11, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Marrickville Greens page
Hi Graeme, I'm not sure where I am meant to put my objection to your suggestion that the entry for Marrickville Greens be deleted. I'll place it here as well as the other places I've put it.

I think the Marrickville Greens should remain an entry on Wikipedia for the following reasons.

The Greens are a decentralised party. Each local group tends to be run campaigns (including non-electoral campaigns) as a separate entity with a lot more autonomy than the Labor and Liberal parties. I don't see why Wikipedia should be limited to entries on state and national parties. People may well be interested in local branches. I've seen whole books related to the Glebe Branch of the ALP for example. I've also seen far more esoteric subjects on Wikipedia. I thought Wikipedia is a live process with room to expand where the community wants to take it. The No Aircraft Noise Party has its own page - one can argue that they are far smaller and less consequential than the Marrickville Greens. The Marrickville by-election has its own wikipedia page - surely one of the main protagonists should have a page. The page provides useful information, backed with references, for the 80,000 people who live in Marrickville are and might want information on, and a history of the local Greens Party, as well as that info for people outside the area. It would seem I could have an entry on myself as a Greens Councillor on Marrickville Council, but the group itself doesn't warrant an entry? That seems arbitrary and if anything the reverse should be the case. I don't think I warrant a page on Wikipedia, but I think the local group does. If someone is reading about Marrickville Council on Wikipedia and it mentions The Greens, don't you think it is more appropriate to be able to link to the local group directly, rather than having a link the The Greens NSW or Australian Greens, which may not provide as useful information.

For all those reasons I do not think it should be deleted. Indeed I think interesting local groups/branches, should be encouraged to put information up. I'd certainly be interested to read it.

Thanks.

Maxphillips (talk) 05:59, 13 June 2009 (UTC)Max Phillips

Lake BG FAR
I've done some more work on it, added stuff about Kingston, and accounted for all the statements. I guess strcture and polish are remaining. Please do comment/reply on the structure. Thanks  YellowMonkey  ( cricket calendar poll! ) paid editing=POV 08:30, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Did You Know problem
Hello! there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath and respond there as soon as possible. Art LaPella (talk) 20:53, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Tag
Re this tag, I haven't seen any evidence that rodeo bullfighting has anything to do with horses. Can you explain the reason for the tag? Thanks - Frank  |  talk  02:10, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Broken Hill railway line, New South Wales
How does one edit the track template for the above section of line (Broken Hill railway line, New South Wales)? There does not appear to be an "E" = edit button!

Tabletop (talk) 01:27, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks for the cleanup :) 125.255.46.86 (talk) 13:53, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

National Curriculum (Australia) - Stub or Start?
I think the classification of this article as a Stub is erroneous under the definition at WikiProject Australia's page. The definition and examples for both Stub and Start would suggest that this article is a Start quality article. A comparison with, for example, Broken Hill railway line, New South Wales which has been classified as 'Start', would suggest that that would be an appropriate classification also. I know this is only a detail, by the way, in amongst all the volume of great work you are doing! -- Ishel99 (talk) 04:30, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for amending that! Didn't want to do it myself since I originated the article. Hoping to make it better than Start as it develops in Australian school life  :)  -- Ishel99 (talk) 00:56, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Nolan-Kelly-The slip.jpg)
 Thanks for uploading File:Nolan-Kelly-The slip.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 05:04, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Tuggeranong Hawks Football Club
Hello Grahamec, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of Tuggeranong Hawks Football Club - a page you tagged - because: already declined, do not re-tag please. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know.  So Why  10:05, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Turin–Genoa railway
Splendid work! I have added as further reading what might seem to be an excessively obscure Italian text: especially as it was published in 1845, the same year that construction of the railway began. Actually it has a lot of good stuff on the context and planning phase of the new railway, and I’ll try to add some material from it to the history section over the next week, at which point it can become a reference. Ian Spackman (talk) 10:26, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
 * My scrappy notes, by the way, are at User:Ian Spackman/Turin–Genoa railway. Ian Spackman (talk) 10:34, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Paris Metro
I saw you recently did some modifications in this area. Could you have a look at Paris Métro Line 8? I'm in the process of translating it from French and would value any help! Is it fine to leave French references?

Acland, Queensland
Hi Grahame, thanks for passing by Acland and creating the talk page with templates, which i had forgotten to do. Are you sure you want to rate it as a stub? My self-interest in this is that that rating may snag it at its current DYK nomination. But also, it's a town of 53 people (now one person). I very much doubt much more will ever be found and written about it than what i have compiled. About the only area with scope for significant expansion could be the description of the heritage-listed mine. Try googling then see what you think! hamiltonstone (talk) 01:50, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
 * thx hamiltonstone (talk) 02:02, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

thx for assessment
of Louis Celeste Lecesne ... cheers Victuallers (talk) 09:42, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

Argonauts
I'm working on a replacement for the Argonauts Club page, and at the stage where I could use some assistance. If you're interested, it's at Doug_butler/The_Childrens_Session --Doug butler (talk) 02:29, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Ernest Archdeacon
Hi Grahame, One of the main benefits of DYK is that the article gets thoroughly reviewed, and then usually classified by you - a vital stage to see what else is needed. I hope that you were asleep when Ernest Archdeacon was up, rather than simply avoiding it as a 'lost cause', but I would be intrigued if you have the time to assess it. ... I am also intrigued about where the raft of 'sloppy' categories on the talk page have come from, to wit, Aviation articles needing attention to referencing and citation | Aviation articles needing attention to coverage and accuracy | Aviation articles needing attention to structure | Aviation articles needing attention to grammar | Aviation articles needing attention to supporting materials | Aviation articles with incomplete B-Class checklists...  Regards. Please keep up the good work. Autodidactyl (talk) 09:27, 16 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks Grahame, Was I/SamBlob misguided in adding blank templates to the talk page? I assumed they would be ideal to alert various projects, as long as I didn't self review. Regards Autodidactyl (talk) 11:44, 16 October 2009 (UTC)


 * I agree, I spent hours on Google just trying to find how Irish he was, etc. ...and optimistically hoped that DYK would trigger additional info. I guess that in a few years somebody will fill in the gaps. Thanks again. Autodidactyl (talk) 12:36, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

Welcome back
Thought for a while that you were off permanently  YellowMonkey  ( bananabucket ) (Invincibles finally at Featured topic candidates) 12:50, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Good to see you back doing housekeeping ;)  Aaroncrick  (talk )  Review me! 10:39, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

ACCC v Baxter Healthcare
Thanks for tagging Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Baxter Healthcare. I've just expanded the article so it can be re-assessed. --Mkativerata (talk) 21:17, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you! --Mkativerata (talk) 14:28, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Capital Wind Farm
Thanks for helping with this and several other wind farm articles. Looking good... Johnfos (talk) 02:38, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the DYK
Thanks for the DYK on the CFA International Cat Show. It is greatly appreciated. Chris (talk) 15:53, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Brindabella, New South Wales
Hi Grahame, you seem to be pretty good at spotting the stubs I create. Thanks for adding to them. Do you think that Brindabella, New South Wales Brindabella Valley and Brindabella Station should be merged? Also this is not exactly a "town", is there a better category? Category:Localities in New South Wales is requested for deletion. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:59, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Tagging of Amazon Eve
I recently removed a speedy delete tag that you had placed on Amazon Eve. I do not think that Amazon Eve fits any of the speedy deletion criteria because Being the "worlds tallest model" is a claim of significance. Note that the bar for an a7 speedy is lower than notability. Note also that if it is "not obvious" whether something is a claim or not, an A7 is probably out, A7 should be clear cut, IMO. I request that you consider not re-tagging Amazon Eve for speedy deletion without discussing the matter on the appropriate talk page. DES (talk) 03:24, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

sydney artists' camps
Hey, thanks for assessing Sydney artists' camps today. I was wondering if you could expand on your edit summary a bit "needs better citing". Do you mean that the citations that are there are done incorrectly, or that they're not good enough quality sources, or that there should be more footnotes in total. Sincerely, Witty Lama 14:05, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Priceline
Hello. The Priceline (Australia) article has an article banner that refers to a lack of inline citations. More precise citations have been added to the article and all information is verifiable against reliable sources. Considering the issue has now been addressed, is it possible to remove the banner? Smallworldsocial (talk) 06:57, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion contested: LifeStyles Condoms
Hello Grahamec, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of LifeStyles Condoms, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 06:45, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

German railway articles
Grahamec, thank you for all the work you do on railway articles. I see you renamed the Höllentalbahn in the Black Forest to Höllen Valley Railway and then changed it back, as it caused problems. I would be interested to know what problems you were referring to. Usually XXXtalbahn can be sensibly translated as XXX Valley Railway because the valley is named after a river XXX. This is common naming practice in English-speaking countries. But I agree that Höllentalbahn is more problematic because the valley's name is not derived from a river but (presumably) from the word for hell: "Hölle". Should we call it "Hell Valley Railway"? I'm not sure. Or "Hölle Valley Railway" dropping the "n" which is only a link letter? In one case this could be appropriate because there is a village called Hölle after which the line is named. It's one of those translation conundrums! Any thoughts? Regards, --Bermicourt (talk) 07:04, 22 February 2010 (UTC)


 * I agree with you. You should be able to move it to Hölle Valley Railway (Black Forest) because the redirect has no history. Otherwise the only way to resolve it is to get an admin to change it. --Bermicourt (talk) 07:11, 22 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Well done! Gruß. --Bermicourt (talk) 12:25, 22 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Dammit. :) Hey, Bermicourt, correct me if I'm wrong but unless you have in between found a source, it is still only your idea that line and valley were named after the village, and not village and line after the valley. No surprises here when I point out that the name is Höllental, not Hölletal, as I have just redundantly done at your site (sorry 'bout that). And what's with dropping a letter from a name in a foreign language just because it's "just a link letter", whatever this is supposed to mean? Still don't think you should be making up names. Translate it (hell valley, which hardly anybody will be looking for) or don't (Höllental is the name, after all), but don't go creating new names. Not here on WP. On the same note, just deciding something shall get a name? Hm. Oh, and Graham - listen to Bermicourt in matters of the river. There's no river named Hölle in any of those valleys. There's the Selbitz in Franconia, the Schwarza in Austria, and the Rotbach in the Black Forest. Regards, and until Hölle freezes over, --G-41614 (talk) 16:08, 15 March 2010 (UTC) (no hard feelings, ok?)

Thuringian Railway
Grahamec, Cool!!! I was just about to start this one, but you beat me to it. Can you add your new articles to WikiProject Trains/Rail transport in Germany task force when they're complete. Thanks! You might as well add your name to the list of contributors too - at least get the credit!! --Bermicourt (talk) 21:14, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

You were recommended
Hello Grahamec. I'm not sure if this happens to you every day, but Clarence63 recommended you to me in an email, when I explained that I was looking for an experienced editor as a mentor who could help me to quickly understand the intricacies of editing Wikipedia. Here is our conversation. I have a background in writing and research, so I'm quite comfortable there. But there are a lot of specific things to learn for Wikipedia. Please let me know your thoughts. Thank you.--TheSoundAndTheFury (talk) 15:08, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Disney XD (Australia)
Hello Grahamec. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Disney XD (Australia), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. Thank you. Olaf Davis (talk) 11:42, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I've replied at my talk. Olaf Davis (talk) 12:30, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Papias
Um, if you think the difference between a B and a C rating for Papias (lexicographer) is an illustration, I invite you to find one. Cynwolfe (talk) 21:04, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

A response to your note
Hello Grahamec. Thanks for responding to my question about mentorship; I wasn't sure how to respond right then, because I did not know what it entailed either. Nevertheless, by now I think I get the idea of how Wikipedia works. The notes on FT2's user page clarified the differences between academic work and Wikipedia. I could use some advice on the best way to proceed with a page I recently created, however:. For your information, here is the document on mentorship:. Thank you. --TheSoundAndTheFury (talk) 01:50, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

alt text
Graham, thanks for having a go ... but alt text is supposed to be for the visually impaired. The one I did for Port Arthur is the first I've ever tried, although I've seen many at FAC. I pretended I was blind. In most cases, it can be shorter than that one, though (the pic is quite complex for Port Arthur). Tony  (talk)  07:32, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion
A template you created has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. –xeno<sup style="color:black;">talk 14:11, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

German railways - great work!
Grahamec, thank you for your great work on German railways. It's encouraging to have such a profilic author/translator on board! One of the subtler aspects of the naming convention which I thought I'd flag up is that when a railway is just named after the places it links, we use the Wiki convention of lower case i.e. XXX–YYY railway with a long dash in between. If the railway has a 'proper name', usually after the valley it's in, then we use upper case i.e. XXX Valley Railway. In addition, and this is where it gets very subtle (!) if the railway is also the name of the operating company (often the case with early railways) we use upper case where you'd expect to see lower i.e. XXX-YYY Railway and a short dash. This is explained at the conventions page with examples. Anyway, keep up the good work! --Bermicourt (talk) 07:11, 30 March 2010 (UTC)


 * PS What sparked your interest in German railways when you live so far away? Have you lived here?


 * in re Interest in German railways: next time you're in Freiburg, feel free to say hi. Promise I won't bother you with the Höllentalbahn (not Hölletalbahn). :) Regards, --G-41614 (talk) 11:33, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Didn't mean to get you involved into something you don't feel like getting involved into. The convention is one thing, but there's a reason behind my issue with the Höllental, or Höllen Valley, and the railroad respectively. It's all here in case you want to take a closer look. Fun thing, I just got an e-mail from the administration where one of the valley's located. Says that the name might be derived from the celtic "hel", as a term for ragged landscapes. So you're kinda right on the spot. --G-41614 (talk) 12:10, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Category:Australian academic journals
Hi, I see you created this category. However, a while ago there was a (limited) discussion about categorizing academic journals by country and it was decided to do away with these cats. Although for some journals it may be straightforward, for the great majority of academic journals it is not. Science is nowadays a very international undertaking and even journals that have the name of a country in their name (such as the Australian journals that you put into this category) will have people from other countries on their editorial boards. If they are published by a commercial publisher, that may at some point merge with another one, based in another country. So even with such journals it will not always be easy to say how it should be categorized according to country. (In fact, the Australian Journal of Entomology is a case in point: it is published by a US-based publisher). If you then take journals such as the one that I edit (Dutch editor, based in France, published by a publisher that is based in the UK but with offices in many other countries and recently merged with a US company), it is basically impossible to say to which country they should be categorized. If you agree, you could remove the categorization from the 3 journals that are currently so tagged and this category will then be deleted automatically after a while. The discussion that I referred to can be found here. Happy editing! --Crusio (talk) 13:24, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi again: Would you mind if I remove this category from the three journals that are currently in it, so that it can be deleted as has been done with similar cats? --Crusio (talk) 13:50, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The problem is that this kind of categorization is meaningless for almost all journals. And as I explained above, it is not even unambiguous for the three journals concerned, as they are published by companies based in the US and UK. The whole point is that nowadays science is never done on a national basis any more, it is always international. I don't know whether this is the case for some journals with the name "Australian" in the title, but many journals that used to be named "British" have changed this (BMJ is an example) and other "British" journals have editors of other nationalities based in other countries. Even though they have "British" in their names, under these conditions it would be strange to categorize them as "British journal". When we still had the categories "British academic journals" and "American academic journals", journals publisehd by Blackwell would be categorized as British and those published by Wiley as American. This would mean that two of the "Australian" journals would actually have to be re-categorized or categorized in more than one national category. And if one then gets, say, a New Zealand editor, would we then add a third national cat? I think it is simpler and more logical to remove all these national categories. --Crusio (talk) 14:12, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, I just checked "History", and its scope specifically includes the Asia-Pacific region and even modern Europe... I have no strong opinion on the Australia project tags. Some people tag some journals with a "project Chicago" tag for no other reason than that the journals (on a host of different topics) are published by the University of Chicago Press... These journals have a clear Australian slant (even though far from exclusive), so the Australian Project might be interested in them. --Crusio (talk) 14:22, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Russian embassy in Canberra
Hi Graham, you took this photo - File:Russian Embassy Canberra.jpg - I am currently discussing various projects with the Russian embassy in Canberra, in trying to recruit them to provide materials for articles such as photos of previous ambassadors to Australia from Soviet Union and Russia for User:Russavia/Australia, and which I hope will turn into far wider co-operation with them in trying to recruit them to push Russian foreign affairs and other organisations to release materials under CC, and perhaps enter into archive agreements with Commons. There is interest there from them in helping me to develop articles such as Australia–Russia relations (which I expanded a few months back). Anyway, in an email I am going to write shortly to them in Canberra, I am going to request that a Wikipedian be organised access to their compounds in Canberra (the embassy, trade mission, etc) in order to take photos, and perhaps of current ambassador, etc. If I put this to them, and they agree, would there be any interest from you in taking up this small assignment? Can you msg me on my talk page if there is, or perhaps email me -- I am in the middle of getting a major request done up for them, and may not be watching other's talk pages, etc. Cheers, --Russavia I'm chanting as we speak 05:49, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Yarralumla, Australian Capital Territory
Hi Graham. Do you know how to address the history section? I'm afraid no suburban/district-level history books on Canberra make it to Adelaide. The other parts look eminently doable to avert a FAR, and I'm going through that at the moment, but the history looks like it needs a Canberran to save.  YellowMonkey  ( vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll )  08:46, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Thuringian Railway
Graham, you beat me to it! More great work! I live in Germany, currently, and have spent a lot of my life here over the years. I am primarily interested in Bavarian railways and love translating German - like you I like a mental challenge: crosswords and jigsaw puzzles being other favourites of mine. I started the Railways of Germany task force and translated and tagged a lot of articles to begin with. I still do some work in that area, but my current focus is articles related to the region I live in. --Bermicourt (talk) 11:11, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Notability of Joe Thambu
Grahamec, you flagged Joe Thambu as possibly not meeting notability guidelines. This is a person who exists in subject matter oriented encyclopedia's [see this link] as the person who introduced his Yoshinkan Aikido to Australia. You can help out by telling me why you felt it failing the noteworthiness test? Specifically, what was it you were looking for but didn't find?

Thank you.

paul@justlikeswimming 06:39, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

PS: Yes, I have read the guidelines reasonably thoroughly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jls aikido (talk • contribs) 06:39, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Ta
Looks like all australian racing articles and categories need a thorough cleanup - I was amazed that there hadnt been any attempt to get even a stub up for the WATC for so long - one of my brothers in law owns a racer by I havent bet on horses for decades :( SatuSuro 09:04, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Please help
Hi

I'm not au fait with Wiki hierarchy etc, so I am writing to you because you reviewed and rated the Gordon Nuttall article on 16 December 2009.

The article "Gordon Nuttall" was blocked from editing from 4 Feb 2010 to 23 April 2010 by Rebecca.

During this time Nuttall's appeal against his conviction and sentence was heard and judged.

Yesterday (23 April 2010), I filled in the missing pieces; to wit,

.....................................

On 12 February 2010, his appeal against conviction & sentence was heard in the Supreme Court of Queensland before Chief Justice Paul de Jersey, Justice Hugh Fraser and Justice Catherine Holmes. On 23 March 2010 his appeal against conviction was unanimously dismissed, and his application for leave to appeal against sentence was unanimously refused.

(Ref: http://archive.sclqld.org.au/qjudgment/2010/QCA10-064.pdf Supreme Court's written judgment)

.......................................

and regarding his second trial for 'official corruption',

......................................

On 9 April 2010, the matter was mentioned in the Brisbane District Court where the Crown's representatives said they would not be ready to go to trial until early 2011.

( Ref: http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/04/09/2868422.htm ABC Online 'Fresh Nuttall trial not until next year' - Kim Lyell - (9 April 2010)

http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-national/nuttall-wont-face-trial-until-next-year-20100409-rygt.html Sydney Morning Herald Online 'Nuttall won't face trial until next year' - Kym Agius - (9 April 2010) )

.....................................

The above paras were deleted by Rebecca, leaving this message on my talk page;

......

"Ah, silly me. I'd forgotten that you were the person who added the BLP violations to the article in the first place. You've got one warning - knock it off, or the article will be reprotected and you'll be blocked for good measure.

The article could really do with an update and some good contributions, but your additions to the article were totally beyond the pale. Moreover, the article is bad enough as it is - it covers the corruption charges against him in ten times more detail as the entire rest of his career.

As such, if you want to contribute to this article productively, please stop, thoroughly read and acquaint yourself with WP:BLP, and start trying to create a neutral, verifiable, and comprehensive article about Nuttall. If you can't do that, please find somewhere else to direct your energy - rest assured that re-adding that material will see you instantly blocked. Rebecca (talk) 08:34, 22 April 2010 (UTC)" ......

So, we are left with Nuttal's appeal & judgment missing on Wiki. I find this situation bizarre and concerning. Can you help?

Regards

Cablehorn (talk) 00:15, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Thank you, Grahamec. Sanitas tandem. Didactik (talk) 08:57, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Fulda-Main Railway
I have zapped that as you requested: there are two links in to it, which I presume you will sort out. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 11:54, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

RfA?
I am surprised that you aren't an administrator. Are you at all interested in becoming one? AGK  22:44, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Australian place name convention
Hi Grahamec. There is currently a discussion being held at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (geographic names)/Archives/2010/August. Your opinion would be very welcome there. Cheers, Mattinbgn\talk 02:38, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

Eastern Docklands
Thanks for cleaning up the verb tenses. I had started but not finished. I appreciate your help, Drmies (talk) 11:28, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

We have survivors
Thanks for your work on History of the ACT  YellowMonkey  ( vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll )  00:37, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

For your work on German railways!
It's great to have you on board! Gruß from Niedersachsen! --Bermicourt (talk) 19:36, 13 June 2010 (UTC)


 * I am a German user living in Frankfurt am Main, interested in railways and (co-)author of a lot of articles on railway lines and railway history in the vincinity within de-Wikipedia. I just redid the Frankfurt-Hanau Railway. Even so the translation is excellent a few "mistakes" did happen (which I put right) and I added a few remarks for English speaking users which a German user (perhaps) would now. If you put any further articles on this subject and within this area into en-Wikipedia, give me a notice and I will check it as a frequent user of those railway lines. -- Reinhard Dietrich (talk) 11:12, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Recent Changes Camp Canberra Aug 11, 2010
I saw you're listed in the ACT Wikipedian page and thought, by chance, you might like to come to this: RecentChangesCamp, Canberra is being held at the University of Canberra, Building 7, Room 7XC37 on 11 August 2010. ABOUT | REGISTRATION | SCHEDULE

Hope we'll see you and friends there, but please register so we can prepare lunch. Leighblackall (talk) 07:20, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Xenobot for tagging Aus based on cats
Do you think it should be used? It would pick up a stack  YellowMonkey  ( vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll )  01:51, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes but we can bump those cats that also have many foreigners  YellowMonkey  ( vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll )  02:40, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

WPBio template
Just a heads up that changes to WPBiography affect the way importance parameters are used. They are now work-group specific. Example here. Thanks. – ukexpat (talk) 13:38, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Hi
Thankyou for creating the talk page and adding the top tag thing (where it says that it is a page related to Australia, etc.) on the Gravity Discovery Centre page, it is much appreciated :) CybergothiChé (talk) 14:58, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

restored a comment
Hi Graham - I restored the comment of mine you removed over at Talk:Chinese immigration to Australia‎ - I presume that it was unintentional on your part to remove the comment, and I'm guessing that you just wanted to return the funny boxes at the top of the page? - I find them both a bit useless, and sometimes actively unhelpful - for example, is the article really being supported by a wikiproject which seems to have been inactive for, well, years to be honest? - anywhooo... ping me if you'd like to chat further, or if you have any feedback on the comment I restored, or for any reason really :-)

Did you create the Terence Clarke (composer) article?
Hi there. I am helping to go through the backlog of articles with no sources. Did you creat the above article? It seems like the subject could be notable, but I cannot find where any of his works are in print. Also, though he has had a long, and apparently successful, career in the arts, I am not sure that alone passes WP:NOTE, especially if not sourced or unverifiable. But I hate deleting articles, so if you could provide some sources, or point me to some, I'll attempt to get this article up to WP standards. Shouldn't be much to it if the sources are there. Thanks! The Eskimo (talk) 18:28, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
 * PS- Please reply on the article's talk page. The Eskimo (talk) 18:35, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Dresden–Görlitz railway
<span style="font-family:Verdana,sans-serif"> — <b style="color:#060;">Rlevse</b> • Talk  • 18:03, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Photography
I noted, after your edit with the tags, that you are interested in photography. I've been searching for copyright-free photos of Plomley, without success. I note that the Queen Victoria Museum and Art Gallery in Launceton, which keeps his collections, has several. Anyone you could contact them to see if they would (it seems possible from their wording) waive their rights in the good cause of having Plomley's article on wiki? If this is too much of a bother, ignore it. I dropped them a note apropos, but know absolutely nothing about copyright on wikipedia or how to upload photos were that possible in this case. Thanks.Nishidani (talk) 13:23, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Minister for Defence Science and Personnel (Australia)
Hello. I deleted the page and moved the other article there. Unfortunately it took me a little while because I moved the wrong article at first. Apologies for polluting the article history, but I think everything is straight now. If not, please let me know and I'll try to fix it. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 05:34, 19 September 2010 (UTC)


 * I think I restored Minister for Defence Materiel (Australia) properly. Please let me know if I caused any other damage. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 05:52, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Lessing Theater
Thanks for the help! Drmies (talk) 21:03, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

CR 492 project tagging
WP:MSHP, the Michigan State Highways Project, and its County-Designated Highway taskforce, are part of WikiProject Michigan already. There is no need to dual-tag the article.  Imzadi  1979   →  03:08, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

George Bryant
I've put some work into a page on Sydney "small theatre" pioneer Beryl Bryant. It includes details on her father, who is quite important to her history. But he already has a page George Bryant, for some very minor film roles. Any thoughts about whether the two pages should be rolled into one?--Doug butler (talk) 22:34, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Strathfield, New South Wales classification
Hi, I know you like to view and class new and old articles. I have recently expanded the Strathfield, New South Wales and was wondering if you could please have a look at this and see if the article could be re classified. If not then just leave it as it is. That would be good thanks. Cheers ***Adam*** 00:59, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for looking into it, when I get a chance I will look into fixing it. ***Adam*** 09:53, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Tonbridge railway station
Thanks for your attempt to improve the article, but your change was covered in the following paragraph. I hope that this rewrite now explains the situation fully. Mjroots (talk) 05:03, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Talk:Ross Adler
I'm assuming "Adler, John Ross" is a mistake, and have changed it to "Adler, Norman Ross". If I'm wrong, please revert and please educate me. Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 12:48, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

DYKs
Many of your articles, like Bützow–Szczecin railway, are close to being eligible for WP:DYK. Usually all they need is few more inline citations, and the nomination itself. If you need help with that, please let me know. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 20:10, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

Dear Grahamec, can I know your opinion in Articles for deletion/The Calm Centre --Mohamed Ouda (talk) 16:58, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Trier Hauptbahnhof
Grahame, I note the changes you have made to the names of the (presently non existent) railway line articles linked from the infobox for this article, and your rationale for your changes. However, I chose the original names after some careful thought.

The problem is that there is both a de:Saarstrecke and a de:Saarbahn, and a de:Moselstrecke and a de:Moselbahn. Meanwhile, the de:Obermoselstrecke page redirects to de:Bahnstrecke Thionville–Trier, so Thionville–Trier railway is probably the correct name for the equivalent en.wiki page (when it is eventually created).

We can probably go with your translation of de:Eifelstrecke, though.

Any comments? Bahnfrend (talk) 12:01, 17 December 2010 (UTC)


 * I agree that railway line is better than route. But neither of them really fits the en.wiki conventions, so I also agree with you as to what is "best".  (FWIW, I think that the format Schmidtstadt–Johannstadt railway is usually the best naming choice for an en.wiki article about a railway, even if the proper de language name of the line is König Johannsbahn or whatever.) Bahnfrend (talk) 13:10, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:John Percival Boy with Cat 2 1943.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:John Percival Boy with Cat 2 1943.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 14:28, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia 10 - Canberra event
Even though you don't live here... and there may be another one nearer you... This is your invitation to the 10th anniversary event for Wikipedia, on Saturday 15 January 2011; please see http://ten.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canberra for details, and RSVP if at all possible. (You are listed on WikiProject_Canberra.) Will I see you there? Cheers, - Peter Ellis - Talk 06:44, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Suburbs of Wagga Wagga, New South Wales
Category:Suburbs of Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mattinbgn (talk) 08:06, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks!
I want to take a second and let you know I appreciate the time you take to rate articles, and specifically some articles I authored about Australian lighthouses. Thank you! --Muhandes (talk) 08:29, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Viaducts
Hello Grahame! Thank you for frequently returning to the Göltzschtalbrücke article to make corrections. I see you started the Elster Valley Viaduct article a while ago and would like to conform both article names to one another.

In a search for what Wikipedia has to say about this, I found a the WikiProject Germany naming convention (Group B) to specifically explain how Weihetalbrücke appears as Weihe Valley Bridge on Wikipedia. In a similar vein, conforming both our articles to this would mean:
 * Elster Valley Viaduct should be moved to Elster Valley Bridge
 * Göltzschtalbrücke should be moved to Göltzsch Valley Bridge

Since I also see that the word Viaduct is frequently used in articles describing railways, this may imply competing style guide naming conventions (e.g. between the WikiProjects of Germany and Railways or Engineering), I would like to hear your thoughts on this proposal to move both articles. Thanks for the pleasant collaboration so far! (Even though it has largely been indirect.) -- Eddyspeeder (talk) 21:51, 5 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Thank you for that response Grahame. Based on that, I have put the naming convention up for discussion. Based on the result of that, I will correct the names accordingly. Any outcome is acceptable to me. Kind regards, Eddyspeeder (talk) 07:18, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Electoral district of Ingleburn


A tag has been placed on Electoral district of Ingleburn requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -Porchcrop (talk 05:21, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

User talk:Porchcrop
Hey. Even though the copyvio tag on Electoral district of Ingleburn was absolutely 100% dead wrong, I thought your comment at User talk:Porchcrop was rather strong to be directed toward an editor who definitely seems to be interested in contributing in good faith. Although he's been having a lot of trouble with CSD lately, he's certainly not a vandal. Thanks and happy editing! Zachlipton (talk) 07:17, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your new comment. I can see why you thought his tag was in bad faith and how off-putting the threatening statement on his talk page are--that's an area of active discussion at WP:Editor review/Porchcrop (4) in fact. Your point about false accusations is a good one too, and not something that gets enough attention. In any case, thanks. Zachlipton (talk) 22:08, 6 March 2011 (UTC)