User talk:Graisonb/Iberian lynx/Ksachs123 Peer Review

First, what does the article do well? Is there anything from your review that impressed you? Any turn of phrase that described the subject in a clear way? This article does really well at explaining the threats to the species, which is mainly from poaching, but also how we are trying to help by captive breeding. What really impressed me was the amount of information on distribution and habitat, since they included almost every single demographic where the Iberian Lynx is located. No specific turn of phrase. What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article? Why would those changes be an improvement? I would suggest adding more to the behavior of the Iberian Lynx because it mainly talks about their hunting behavior and reproduction. Adding more about their day-to-day behavior will make the article stronger. What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article? The most important thing is maybe adding more to the characteristics of the Iberian Lynx, maybe about how it evolved over time. Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? If so, what? Maybe about the section for what humans are doing to increase the amount of Iberian lynx. Black Howlers are also endangered, so adding in more about conservation would help. Are the sections organized well, in a sensible order? Would they make more sense presented some other way (chronologically, for example)? Specifically, does the information they are adding to the article make sense where they are putting it? The section order does make sense. It first starts off with a summary of the Iberian Lynx. After that it goes into about the lynx itself and then its behavior/reproduction. Towards the end of the article, it goes into human interaction, conservation, and how they are important in popular culture. Is each section's length equal to its importance to the article's subject? Are there sections in the article that seem unnecessary? Is anything off-topic? All the lengths of each section are suffice. I feel the last section, “in popular culture”, is not really beneficial nor relevant to the Iberian Lynx but it is interesting. Does the article draw conclusions or try to convince the reader to accept one particular point of view? No the article is unbiased. Are there any words or phrases that don't feel neutral? For example, "the best idea," "most people," or negative associations, such as "While it's obvious that x, some insist that y." No, purely research and statistics. Are most statements in the article connected to a reliable source, such as textbooks and journal articles? Or do they rely on blogs or self-published authors? Almost all of the resources are from scientific articles or textbooks. Each evidence in the article are linked back to the references. Are there a lot of statements attributed to one or two sources? If so, it may lead to an unbalanced article, or one that leans too heavily into a single point of view. Not really, they had 82 references and not a lot were drawn from the same source. Are there any unsourced statements in the article, or statements that you can't find stated in the references? Just because there is a source listed, doesn't mean it's presented accurately! Everything was cited accordingly to the reference pulled from.

Ksachs123 (talk) 17:55, 15 October 2023 (UTC) Kayla Sachse