User talk:Granatapaolo

Copyright problems with Teo Ciavarella
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Teo Ciavarella, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Teo Ciavarella appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Teo Ciavarella has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Jhbuk (talk) 23:11, 6 February 2010 (UTC)


 * yes, it appears on several websites. That means that it is subject to copyright, in the absence of any further evidence on the website that it is free., Please read the message above. If you assert it is free, you need to provide the evidence as explained above. If you wrote it, and hold the copyright on it, you need to say so, and to donate it to us formally. As I see no such indication, As reviewing administrator,  I have deleted it.   He might possibly be notable, so you are welcome to rewrite the article. But it must have references providing substantial coverage from  3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online (but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases).  The website of tradebits or similar sites is not sufficient.  DGG ( talk ) 03:26, 7 February 2010 (UTC)