User talk:GrandEditor2017

Welcome
G'day GrandEditor2017, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; they have helped improve Wikipedia and made it more informative. I hope you enjoy using Wikipedia and decide to make additional contributions.

As a contributor to Australian articles, you may like to connect with other Australian Wikipedians through the Australian Wikipedians' notice board and take a look at the activities in WikiProject Australia and associated sub-projects. Wikimedia Australia your local chapter organises editor training workshops, meetups and other events. If you would like to know more, email [mailto:help@wikimedia.org.au?subject=Help+me+please!&body=Please+tell+us+your+Wikipedia+username+and+the+article+you+are+trying+to+change+and+what+the+problem+is help@wikimedia.org.au].

If you are living in Australia and want to subscribe to location based notices, you can add location userboxes to your userpage.

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~ ; this will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you have any questions, please see Where to ask a question, try the Help desk, or ask me on my talk page. Or you can just type   on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Some other resources to help new Wikipedians include:


 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Article titles
 * Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Thank you for signing up! Kerry (talk) 13:23, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Minor edits - some advice
I notice that your edits are all marked as minor but in the world of Wikipedia, some don't appear to be minor. For Wikipedia purposes, a minor edit is one that that does not change the information content of the article, merely improving on its appearance (e.g. spelling, punctuation, formatting, etc). If you change the information content of the article (which includes the sources cited), then it's not minor. A lot of vandals use the "minor" edit flag to try to fly under the radar of normal scrutiny so anyone with a long stream of minor edits is likely to attract attention and finding non-minor edits within that stream of minor edits will then be a bit of a "red flag" that there may be mischief. Just to show you some concrete examples, this edit of yours is minor, but this one is not minor. If you aren't sure, don't tick minor. If you need any help (about this or anything else), please don't hesitate to ask me directly or ask at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board. I hope you like the lamington photo above, given its QUT origins. Kerry (talk) 13:34, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, GrandEditor2017. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Dhruva College of Management, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the request edit template);
 * disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Regards, SshibumXZ (Talk) (Contributions). 16:31, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dhruva College of Management


The article Dhruva College of Management has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Does not meet WP:GNG. All content is self-sourced."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Orville1974 talk 01:45, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dhruva College of Management - Logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Dhruva College of Management - Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:29, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Dhruva College of Management for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dhruva College of Management is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Dhruva College of Management until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Orville talk 15:12, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Dhruva College of Management for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dhruva College of Management is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Dhruva College of Management& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vikram Vincent 10:33, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

March 2021
Your recent editing history at Dhruva College of Management shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Vikram Vincent 12:29, 28 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Hola! Adding links which do not satisfy WP:RS won't help. Might help to take a breath and have a discussion before proceeding. Vikram Vincent 13:02, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi Vincent, Sorry for my mistake. I just now noticed all your messages. I have the habit of editing content as personal blogging and content writing are my best hobbies. I will be grateful if you could please remove my name from Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard. You can revert the content on the page. I assure that I will never repeat this again in future. GrandEditor2017 (talk) 13:58, 28 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi! It might be better if you can yourself revert your edits which are problematic and respond to the queries raised. The edits appear like an advertisement that are sourced to either a primary source(college website) or press releases and non-RS sources. Also do participate in the AFD mentioned above. Best! Vikram Vincent 15:30, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi Vikram, as told by you, I have now removed the content from the page. Could you please remove my name from the noticeboard. I am just a passionate editor and now I understood wiki's guidelines and will follow it strictly hereafter. Thanks and Regards. GrandEditor2017 (talk) 16:16, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Vikram Vincent 13:28, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Dhruva College of Management - Logo.png


A tag has been placed on File:Dhruva College of Management - Logo.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. VV 07:49, 13 April 2021 (UTC)