User talk:Grandeari5032

March 2015
Hello, I'm IndianBio. Your recent edit to the page Mariah Carey singles discography appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Indian: BIO  [ ChitChat  ] 07:07, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

You're invited to the Teahouse.
Hello Grandeari5032, thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! I want to invite you to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. I hope you see you there! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding to your message. @ 20:40, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Changes to "List of awards and nominations received by Ariana Grande"
Hello, I'm Aytk. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to List of awards and nominations received by Ariana Grande because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. - AYTK 20:23, 7 April 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aytk (talk • contribs)

April 2015
Please do not add or change content, as you did to Ariana Grande, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Changing an artist's genres is very contentious and must be backed up with reliable sources. —C.Fred (talk) 20:45, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Ariana Grande. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ''The cited source says 500,000 copies. If you want to update the figure, you must provide an updated source.'' —C.Fred (talk) 04:34, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ariana Grande. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -- Azealia 911  talk  21:03, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. -- Azealia 911  talk  21:33, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Associated Acts
Please don't add people with a few collaborations to the "associated acts" fields in infoboxes. That field is intended for long-term collaborations over multiple works, like John Lennon and The Beatles.&mdash;Kww(talk) 21:17, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Ariana Grande. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. –Chase (talk / contribs) 23:36, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Figure tampering
The next time you make an edit like this one which clearly contradicts the cited source, you will be blocked from editing. When you change figures, it is your obligation to provide sources for the new figures.&mdash;Kww(talk) 04:42, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for constant introduction of false and unsourced information. Any administrator can unblock this editor when the editor agrees to provide only correct information supported by reliable sources. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. &mdash;Kww(talk) 13:56, 4 May 2015 (UTC)