User talk:Grandmission

I have redirected a page you created
Thanks for you contributions of West park toll road. Unfortunately, Wikipedia already has that page at Westpark Tollway. Therefore, I linked West park toll road to Westpark Tollway. Happy editing. Ask if you have any questions. Piguy101 (talk) 23:22, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 14 pews


A tag has been placed on 14 pews requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. - MrX 03:49, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Welcome
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent edits, such as the ones to the page Birdman (rapper), do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can write   below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.


 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ; this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! IPadPerson (talk) 18:13, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of John dimo


A tag has been placed on John dimo, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here.  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  06:11, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pierce Bush
Hello Grandmission,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Pierce Bush for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Trivialist (talk) 23:00, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Edit warring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on George W. Bush. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 02:58, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Please stop wasting your time and ours
Many editors have the George W. Bush article on their Watchlists and will. While I note that you have now found some sources, your additions are fairly significant. Rather than Edit warring, you would do better by taking your proposed additions to the article's talk page for discussion. HiLo48 (talk) 03:01, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Misrepresentation of sources
If I see further gross misrepresentation of sources, as present in your latest edit to the George W. Bush article, I will have no hesitation in reporting the matter, and asking that sanctions be taken against you. As an encyclopaedia open to anyone to contribute, Wikipedia extends, on behalf of its readers, a great deal of trust to contributors, and those who abuse that trust by engaging in false representation of sources cannot expect to be permitted to continue to edit. AndyTheGrump (talk) 03:08, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of War times 2
Hello Grandmission,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged War times 2 for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. — Abderrahman (talk) 12:22, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of War times 2


The article War times 2 has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No indication the subject meets the notability guidelines for inclusion.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. § FreeRangeFrog croak 17:01, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of War times 2 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article War times 2 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/War times 2 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. § FreeRangeFrog croak 03:12, 30 November 2014 (UTC)