User talk:Granjohn

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 14:31, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of John Granowski


A tag has been placed on John Granowski requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Slon02 (talk) 22:06, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

April 2011
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hopkins, Minnesota. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. – anna  23:38, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

July 2011
I have indefinitely blocked this account as I see nothing but vandalism in the user's contibutions. You may ask for a review of this block by copying below this message and providing a reason for unblocking where it says "Your reason here"; but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Tide  rolls  05:25, 11 July 2011 (UTC)