User talk:Granovskii

Granvoskii, in Combined cycle, the section you wrote about semi-closed combined turbine cycles seems to have valuable knowledge, yet it has very many problems of organization, and errors of English grammar and usage. It is so very hard to read, that many people will not read it, so it is a waste of this knowledge. I wrote the text that you discarded, because I am willing to help with the English, but also I am not willing to do an edit war. I will just leave the ugly text for now, and both you and this technique will look bad. (That is a waste of your effort.) If you agree to collaborate, then please edit the text which you discarded: Fix errors that I made. If you add credit and references, please put them into citations so that they do not interrupt the attention of the reader. In the organization, I tried to interest the reader: First describe some uses, the value of the technique (the high energy efficiency!), then the basic technique, then important details. Encyclopedia readers will skip text that is written as if for a chemical engineering journal: Most do not understand these values, and if the interesting items are at the end, they will never see them. Best wishes in any case. Ray Van De Walker (talk) 06:00, 23 December 2019 (UTC)