User talk:Grantfarr1

Undue weight and citation spam
Multiple editors have reverted your recent edits because, among various reasons, creating a new "Further reading" section with one publication gives undue weight to that publication, and adding the same publication to multiple articles looks like citation spamming. We assume good faith of other editors on Wikipedia, but please read WP:UNDUE and WP:REFSPAM to be advised about why your edits are being reverted by other editors. Thanks, --Ronz (talk) 18:07, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

April 2018
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Web design. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 16:17, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Vsmith. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. --Vsmith (talk) 22:49, 29 April 2018 (UTC)