User talk:Grapevine.79

Proposed deletion of Chaos Theory (essay)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Chaos Theory (essay), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Wikipedia is not for original research

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.  Evan ¤  Seeds  02:17, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Chaos Theory (essay)
I have nominated Chaos Theory (essay), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Chaos Theory (essay). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. KuroiShiroi (talk) 02:50, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Thomas Oliverius
A tag has been placed on Thomas Oliverius, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of Thomas Oliverius and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.  Cheers  Kyle1278 23:34, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Re. Message
There is no reason for the page there is no context it only has an external internal link and there is no sing of WP:notability.  Cheers  Kyle1278 23:42, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * You can not use a Wikipeida page for a resources let alone one that will be deleted by an WP:ADF you need external sources.  Cheers  Kyle1278 23:44, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Relativistic chaos
A tag has been placed on Relativistic chaos, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article that does not provide sufficient context to identify its subject. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Kingpin13 (talk) 08:38, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:22, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Dragonfly Effect
I have nominated Dragonfly Effect, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Dragonfly Effect. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Plastikspork (talk) 18:44, 27 March 2009 (UTC)