User talk:Grapezxd

June 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to 0.999..., did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: 0.999... was changed by Grapezxd (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.9505 on 2012-06-27T04:35:52+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:36, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 0.999... with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 04:37, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Suggestion
Read this: DBAD] Jim1138 (talk) 04:38, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 0.999..., you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Eeekster (talk) 04:39, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:49, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Grapezxd for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Singularity42 (talk) 11:01, 27 June 2012 (UTC)