User talk:Graph.williams

June 2018
Hello, I'm Bonadea. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Design have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. bonadea contributions talk 11:17, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Insight. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Your language changes are actually introducing a lot of errors to the articles, maybe because you look at individual phrases instead of whole sentences and contexts. bonadea contributions talk 11:26, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Loan, you may be blocked from editing. ''
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please be more careful.  bonadea'' contributions talk 11:45, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by introducing incorrect information, as you did with this edit to Template. DVdm (talk) 11:47, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Before you add or remove spaces...
... to or from standard expressions, please consult a dictionary or do a Google search. Most of your recent edits were either pointless, or introduced errors. Thanks. - DVdm (talk) 11:54, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Rithme4
You make the same kind of errors as blocked user. Are you the same person? - DVdm (talk) 12:08, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Variants of English
By the way, regarding this edit, please have a look at wp:ENGVAR and wp:RETAIN. - DVdm (talk) 12:19, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Hello. In a recent edit to the page Coding, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. - DVdm (talk) 12:19, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Mistakes in editing
Not one of your edits has made any significant improvement to the page on which it was made, and almost all of them have introduced errors. Some of those errors have just been mistakes in English grammar or punctuation, some of them have made significant changes to the meaning of what a sentence says, and some have added statements which are factually wrong.

Please do not continue to try to correct English grammar, spelling, or punctuation, because you do not have enough understanding of those to be able to help. If you think there is a mistake in an article, please check and make sure before you change it. For example, a couple of seconds typing a search on Google, Wikipedia, or any of many other places, would have shown you that the word metol exists.

If you continue to make unconstructive edits, even if you mean well, you wil be blocked from editing.

Also, I see that you have not yet answered the question above about Rithme4. Please do answer it. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:15, 29 June 2018 (UTC)


 * user contuinues to make bad and pointless  edits, and refuses to answer question. - DVdm (talk) 13:15, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
 * And more: and . - DVdm (talk) 13:22, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing, because you persist in the totally unhelpful and often harmful kinds of editing described above, clearly with no intention of trying to address the problems, or even to answer messages expressing concerns. It also seems highly probable that this account is a sockpuppet used to evade a block on another account. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:32, 2 July 2018 (UTC)