User talk:Graull

Are you a new editor?
This doesn't seem as your first edit Special:Diff/919295823---SharabSalam (talk) 00:15, 6 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Hello friend. Hmm why so? I used to edit wikipedia without making an account previously. Have a wonderful day! Graull (talk) 03:38, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
SharabSalam (talk) 14:23, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Please leave me alone. I am not disrupting editing or sockpuppeting from a blocked account. Just because I don't share similar views on the Houthis as you do does not make me a disruptive person in wikipedia. This place is for everyone to edit, so please leave me alone and let me edit in peace. Thanks. Graull (talk) 17:30, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

October 2019
Hello, I'm SharabSalam. I noticed that you recently removed content from Fall of Zinjibar and Jaar without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Dont remove content without an explanation SharabSalam (talk) 19:10, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Please see my edits before you accuse me of removing content. I am editing from my phone and sometimes I cut in one edit and paste into another edit. All my edits are made from the sources provided. Graull (talk) 19:13, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
 * I would also appreciate if you stop following me around wikipedia. Thanks. Graull (talk) 19:13, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
 * , I am not following you. I am a Yemeni. I have interest in these articles; hence they are in my watchlist. I see your edits problematic and I cant just let you harm wikipedia.--SharabSalam (talk) 19:15, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
 * I am sorry but you don't own the articles or wikipedia. My edits are not problematic as they are exactly as the sources mentioning them. You are welcome to tell me what you think is problematic instead of following me around, opening investigations on me, attacking my opinion on talk pages, and reverting my edits. Graull (talk) 19:17, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
 * You removed sourced content. I don't have to own wikipedia to be responsible for protecting it. I am a volunteer and I have interest in these articles. I cant let you remove source content.--SharabSalam (talk) 19:20, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
 * What sourced content I have removed? I am adding and organizing the content. A source on 2011 battle can't have another source of a 2016 battle right next to it as if they're the same! If the text written in wikipedia dosent match the text of the source then that's when I remove it as it dosent make sense! This is common sense. Please stop harassing me! Graull (talk) 19:22, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
 * This Special:Diff/920771023 which I readded. BTW you arent an extended confirmed user. You should not be editing in articles that are related to the Yemeni civil war.--SharabSalam (talk) 19:25, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

You are just so eager to revert my edits aren't you. I have readded the sources I removed in this edit into the battle title!! I am using a phone so I need to cut and paste in seperate edits instead of one edit! Also, you can't tell me what I can or cannot edit. The internet is free and I don't see any "rule" saying I can't edit because I'm not "extended confirmed user" or whatever that means. Again, for the hundredth time, leave me alone! Graull (talk) 19:30, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
 * When you open the editor change the end of the link by writing "all" instead of the number. Also write an edit summary if you want to move.-SharabSalam (talk) 08:24, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm copying from one section and pasting it into the otherand I've been leaving edit summaries! If you would only leave me alone you would see that I didnt delete any information but simply relocated it! You just revet me in less than a second after my first edit. This is alarming! Graull (talk) 12:54, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Did you see the talk page?
That article of al-Qaeda is about a different topic..it about a conflict that ended in 2011.--SharabSalam (talk) 07:55, 14 October 2019 (UTC)


 * It's the aftermath section!! Let me explain what aftermath means in case you're not very good in English: aftermath means 'the period following an event, such as an accident or war, and the effects caused by the event" .. that section talks about the aftermath of Al qaeda insurgency once it escalated into a full civil war!


 * Also, if you can please stop harrasing my edits that would be great. If my edits are problematic another user other than yourself are welcome to revert me and explain why, but it seems you have such a bad agenda against me that you want me to stop editing wikipedia overall. Please stop annoying me and making my editing experience horrible, thanks. Graull (talk) 12:52, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Calm down. Why are you so freaking angry all the time? I know what aftermath means. That whole content is an original research. There is no relationship between the topic of the article and the sources in the section. Also please, the UAE newspaper is not a reliable source for UAE conflicts. As far as I know the UAE has cut deals with al-Qaeda to make it look like if the won in the battle.--SharabSalam (talk) 19:43, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
 * This is about security belt forces and Al Qaeda, not UAE conflicts! There's nothing to do with the UAE! Also, I added another source in my edits not just the national source but you reverted regardless! Why do you keep seeing things from your perspective only. Please be neutral, I don't care if you hate UAE but the source is documented and if you think it's non-neutral then you need to seek consensus not me! I am tried of you following me around and harassing me! Graull (talk) 19:59, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

October 2019
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! SharabSalam (talk) 13:29, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Houthi government
I never claimed Houthi government is not a real thing, "Houthi government" it directs to the Houthi movement page. The proper name is the supreme revolutionary committee and the political council not "Houthi government". Also it's the Yemen flag not the Houthi flag. If you say it's the Houthi government then the Houthis flag should be there not the Yemen flag! Graull (talk) 13:36, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Write edit summaries. Don't try to sneak edits like that. I didn't realise the flag change. Will self-revert.--SharabSalam (talk) 13:39, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Sorry to see you go
As also mentioned here, I am sorry to learn that you decided to leave the project. Sorry also that I just plain forgot to follow up on that ANI thread until today — it has been closed by another admin, at any event. Thanks again for your kind words. As mentioned, I hope you have a change of heart and that you will choose to return as a contributor. If you do, you are always welcome on my talk page, even if just to say hi. All the best, El_C 18:17, 3 November 2019 (UTC)