User talk:GravityUp/Archives

Test
Just testing user talk. Dspradau 18:46, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:TomasBat/Universal Autographs.
Hello,. I noticed you have User:TomasBat/Universal Autographs in your signature page, and I thought I should notify you of the MfD discussion currently taking place for it. · AndonicO Talk 01:43, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Your request for rollback
After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, then contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some information on how to use rollback, you can view this page. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, just leave me a message if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Happy editing! Tiptoety talk 21:34, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback can be used to revert vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback may be removed at any time.

No - not an unconstructive edit - just removing a minor inaccuracy. Fix your bot! 86.0.102.209 (talk) 22:39, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Ok, thanks. 86.0.102.209 (talk) 22:40, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Irish people
Just wondering if there's a problem with this article. I made a minor edit (took at AD because it's not appropriate to use it in conjunction with "millennium"). You reverted, but then reinstated. I look at the edit history and my edit seems to include several other changes that I didn't make. Any ideas? Sorry about messing up your user/talk page; and your original reversion was so quick I thought it was an automated bot! 86.0.102.209 (talk) 22:47, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Curious Edit
Just a little curious about this? Eric-Wester (talk) 14:04, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Seems that there was a simultanius edit. Sorry sometimes a vandals edit will get thrown back in because of it. My appoligies for the happening. ♠  Dspradau   ♠ 14:07, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Thank you
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my main page template. Darn... I made my page like that so people couldn't mess with it. Oh, well. It can't stop everyone...  ~Beano~  (talk) (contribs)  21:41, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

hi
hi how are you doing this fine evening —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.165.236.169 (talk) 04:30, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Apparent mistake
I do not believe that you would intentionally vandalize a page. It must've been an accident. Here, you reverted to vandalism. -- IRP ☎ 22:05, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah Huggle seems to screw up on reverts sometimes. My apologies. -- ♠Dspradau♠  ♠talk♠ ♠contribs♠  22:09, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Hamzah malik
Hmm, you reverted the blanking by the creator (which equates to requesting deletion per CSD), restored the WP:BLP violation (which should have been blanked), and warned the creator for blanking? Dloh  cierekim  22:23, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah that was a mistake. Thanks for alerting me of it. Won't happen again. -- ♠Dspradau♠  ♠talk♠ ♠contribs♠  22:28, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Santiago Cortés
If you think what I did was bad try reading the article. fact is the whole thing needs to bee taken in back of the barn and shot. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.142.216.26 (talk) 01:06, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
 * While the article may constitute advertising. Your edit was still unacceptable and was removed. If to clean-up the article you may do so. As long as it is edited correctly. -- ♠Dspradau♠  ♠talk♠ ♠contribs♠  01:15, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Thx...
...for this! --Say Headcheese!-- hexa Chord 2  01:28, 15 November 2008 (UTC)


 * No problem. Happy to help! :) -- ♠Dspradau♠  ♠talk♠ ♠contribs♠  01:29, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Your Huggle is stuffing up
What happened here? It stuffed up the transclusion. – Jerry  teps  22:32, 18 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Oh boy looks like an error in the new version. Thanks for mentioning it. -- ♠Dspradau♠  ♠talk♠ ♠contribs♠  22:34, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Vandals
Thanks for reverting vandals on my page. He was pretty persistent. Seems we both have some. Shawnpoo (talk) 23:34, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Stirling Wright is not a real person.
I am going to sue Wiki as someone made it up...THat's why I deleted the content. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.227.77.104 (talk) 04:04, 10 March 2009 (UTC)