User talk:GravityUp/ArchivesCB/2018/September

Discussion
I did not vandaliz th information rong I know lotof marin and the I in formation is bad — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.45.250.248 (talk) 17:18, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
 * The reference to the information states otherwise. Please refrain from adding un-sourced information. - GravityUp &#8593;&#9993; 17:23, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Wayne NJ
I received this notice about an un-cited piece of info from the wayne page that you said you removed. Your message already disappeared but it said it would go back in if cited.

I recall doing that (the only time I ever added to a page), but I have no clue what I might have said/written that you took out. I live in wayne so it was something I probably came across. And I think it had to be quite a long time ago. What was it? 67.80.113.170 (talk) 13:34, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Correct. This is the edit in question from just over 24 hours ago. Information such as that should have some reliable sourcing to go along with it. Living within the subject of the article, while useful, does not exactly qualify as a reliable source. The article as a whole is well-sourced already. Feel free to re-add the information while providing reliable sourcing. Happy editing! - GravityUp &#8593;&#9993; 13:47, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

First country rapper
No disrespect to AXS nor Kid Rock. But I think the first country rapper was most likely Shawn Browm aka. The Rappin Duke. His song Da Ha is from around 1984. https:// youtu.be/RAkB1CabkAo Just something to consider. JARG Lee Kennedy — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.255.202.121 (talk) 15:42, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Hello, could you let me know what this message is in reference too? - GravityUp &#8593;&#9993; 13:59, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Stephen Jones Rugby Journalist
You recently removed an edit I had made to this individual’s Wili entry (and appear to have got me banned from editing anything for two years) apparently on the grounds of “vandalism “.

I object to your high-handed, arbitrary and dictatorial actions, not only on principle, but also on the basis that my edit was entirely evidence-based. I’d be happy to take you through the evidence of his behaviour, although you could just take the time to make a little effort yourself. Look at his Twitter feed, maybe, where he is frequently abusive, often late at night, perhaps while a little booze has been taken (look at the pictures of him)?

What price freedom of speech or truth on Wikipedia?

simongrant61@gmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.147.246.204 (talk) 22:16, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
 * For reference, I believe the edit you are objecting to is this edit. Then reason why your edit was reverted was because it fails to adhere to a neutral point of view. Stating your opinion as fact and judgmental language does not achieve a neutral point of view. - GravityUp &#8593;&#9993; 13:52, 14 September 2018 (UTC)