User talk:Gravy059

November 2013
Hello, I'm Clpo13. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living person   on Rosie O'Donnell, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. clpo13(talk) 00:08, 28 November 2013 (UTC) what the hell is the matter! I have every reference and truth listed!!!!!!!!!!

December 2013
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Rosie O'Donnell. Thank you. &#124; Uncle Milty  &#124;  talk  &#124;  12:42, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

hello, what do you mean poorly referenced? iv'e go n.j. opra records, the library of congress subject heading, statements on larry kink live, everything you need. so if you made this page to be pretty and untrue, then you've done a great job!!!!

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Rosie O'Donnell. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You have yet to supply a link to a reliable source that says anything related to the statements you keep adding. &#124;  Uncle Milty  &#124;  talk  &#124;  17:47, 2 December 2013 (UTC) why do you keep threatening to ban me? I have every proof in need. YOU SIR, JUST DON'T WANT TO SEE!!!!!!!

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Rosie O'Donnell, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Favonian (talk) 18:12, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=584406724 your edit] to Rosie O'Donnell may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:18, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
clpo13(talk) 18:46, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
clpo13(talk) 16:51, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Your vendetta
Stop. No matter how hard you try, you will not be allowed to use Wikipedia as a weapon in your quest to find your child. Yes, I've read your blog, I've read the snippets of your "books" available through Google and Amazon. I get what you are trying to, but this isn't the place. Your attempts to attack the reputation of a person whose bio is here on Wikipedia and to substantiate those attacks using your self-published "books" cannot and will not be allowed to exist here. -- &#124;  Uncle Milty  &#124;  talk  &#124;  20:08, 3 December 2013 (UTC) Attacking Rosie in a quest to find my child? Sir, for one thing, letting people know that Rosie funded, was affiliated and worked for an adoption agency isn't an assault on her character, moral or not! Information is a helpful guideline for attaining character - moral or not! Also the only reason I even mentioned my book was to substantiate fact from fiction by means of the Library of Congress discrediting "cuteness" and a realizing of what "Children of the World" has accomplished.Gravy059 (talk) 21:00, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Blocked
I've blocked you indefinitely because it does not appear that you are here to help build the encyclopedia. Mark Arsten (talk) 21:20, 3 December 2013 (UTC)