User talk:Grayhat551

Please Stop editing Trinity Western University as you're damaging the article with incorrect WP:MOS changes and bad grammar. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:22, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

August 2012
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Trinity Western University does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:06, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Please start to use the edit summary for every action. You might also want to use the Show preview button. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:02, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

September 2012
Hello, I'm Walter Görlitz. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Trinity Western University, but you didn't provide a reliable source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ''Also, I warned you both here and at your IP, 207.6.240.248, that continued addition of material without adding a summary would be removed without a second thought. The fact that it's unreferenced makes it even easier.'' Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:32, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Trinity Western University. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:11, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Trinity Western University. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:47, 10 September 2012 (UTC)


 * This edit, to my talk page where you request that I "Please stop removing material to the Trinity Western University page that is encyclopedic" is inaccurate as you can see from above and your IP account. First, it may informative, but without a reference, it's not encyclopedic. I suppose I should simply tag it with a Ciitation needed template, but you're also ignoring the edit history on the article where I explain why it's being removed and the requests above to supply edit summaries for your additions. I will ask you to remove the log from your own eye before asking me to remove the speck from mine. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:29, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
 * And now that you've shown that you know of talk pages, you have no excuse for ignoring the tags on your own. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:31, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

You are full of shit I use citations - someone mentioning WWII doesn't need to cite that it happened. Put on some CCM music.

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did at User talk:Walter Görlitz, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:03, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
 * You should not call people bigots when you don't have all the facts. In fact, I am not anti-Catholic as I have two cousins who are close to me who are Roman Catholic. The reason your material is being removed has been explained above. I didn't tag you for your most recent addition of content since you did it at the same time as calling me a bigot. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:07, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 05:54, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:15, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:39, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:57, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Trinity Western University shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Yunshui 雲&zwj;水 09:47, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:12, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule&#32;at Trinity Western University. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Yunshui 雲&zwj;水 07:07, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Trinity Western Spartans men's basketball 1986.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Trinity Western Spartans men's basketball 1986.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:24, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for repeated image copyright violations. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:26, 13 September 2012 (UTC)