User talk:Grazedandconfused

Jennifer Government: NationStates & the "Possible Abuse" section
You commented on Talk:Jennifer Government: NationStates, particularly the deleted "Possible Abuse" section. As a new editor, I would greatly appreciate further comment, more information, or some advice regarding this article and this issue -- particularly as I and another editor have added unanswered comments. Essentially, the "Possible Abuse" section meets WP:VERIFY/WP:RS and the rest of the article really does not. After a month (in which NS staff have commented on this issue) no new sources have been added to the original article and none are likely to be. WP:COMMONSENSE and WP:CONTEXTMATTERS indicates that rules of NS, events on NS, announcements by the site owner, etc., are best sourced from NS itself. WP:3PARTY will almost never exist. What are your thoughts? Assuming I wish to follow-up, I assume reversing the edit deleting the Possible Abuse section would be bad form. Should I seek WP:DR and, if so, how? Thank you in advance for your time and any assistance. --Po-tee-weet (talk) 01:44, 9 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your helpful comments on my Talk page and for adding further comment on the article Talk page. I do not mean to offend and I am just curious, but are you affiliated with NS in any capacity?  Please feel free not to answer and I apologize if the question is inappropriate.  Po-tee-weet (talk) 22:24, 9 April 2014 (UTC)