User talk:Graziella888

N o f o rmation Talk  01:15, 28 December 2011 (UTC) N o f o rmation Talk  01:15, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

December 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Iridology appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this. Thank you. Iridology McSly (talk) 18:45, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Iridology shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. N o f o rmation Talk  01:14, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Please Stop
If you make another reversion at Iridology I will have to report you to the appropriate noticeboard. Wikipedia editors are expected to collaborate. Please discuss your edits on the talk page. N o f o rmation Talk  01:18, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Since you reverted again I have reported you for a WP:3RR violation. N o f o rmation Talk  01:31, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a short time for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Kuru  (talk)  18:16, 28 December 2011 (UTC)