User talk:GreSebMic

Your submission at Articles for creation: Linearized augmented-plane-wave method has been accepted
 Linearized augmented-plane-wave method, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Linearized_augmented-plane-wave_method help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Theroadislong (talk) 09:28, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of FLEUR for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article FLEUR is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/FLEUR until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. WaddlesJP13 (talk &#124; contributions) 16:32, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for engaging constructively at the deletion debate and for working to improve the FLEUR page! I know that AfD's can be nerve-wracking and that it's often not clear what is expected of articles, but with a little luck, something good may come of it. Cheers, XOR&#39;easter (talk) 23:46, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Don't worry. Of course, I put some time into writing that article, but I'm not really emotionally involved. I see this discussion positive. I was not careful enough when writing the article, chose a few wrong words, and was not aware of some guidelines. The constructive feedback in the discussion gives me the opportunity to reflect on this and to improve the article. In the end this is beneficial to the article and an interesting experience for me. I hope the article passes this test. :) GreSebMic (talk) 01:19, 10 August 2021 (UTC)


 * I have closed the discussion as keep, since you have made multiple improvements to your article, which fix errors and violations, and make it not necessarily eligible for deletion anymore, and the majority has decided to keep it. WaddlesJP13 (talk &#124; contributions) 18:03, 10 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Thank you. I clearly made a few mistakes when creating the article. Your constructive feedback helped me to fix them. I will be more cautious in the future.GreSebMic (talk) 18:32, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Editing Wikipedia is a continual learning process! I started in 2017 and still don't know what people are talking about some of the time. :-) XOR&#39;easter (talk) 19:54, 10 August 2021 (UTC)