User talk:Greasemann

Thoughts
If you have any thoughts on any edits I've made to Wikipedia, post them here! Greasemann (talk) 00:29, 28 March 2017 (UTC)Greasemann

Sources are required
You're kind of new here, so I am trying to extend you a courtesy explanation rather than escalating this issue for administrative action. You need to read WP:BURDEN: "All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and is satisfied by providing a citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution.". If you will self-revert, then seek consensus on the article's talk page, we can move on and see if a consensus develops. Sundayclose (talk) 02:41, 28 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Alright, I will revert my edit. It's no problem, really. Greasemann (talk) 02:43, 28 March 2017 (UTC)Greasemann

Disambiguation link notification for March 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited K Ranju Rangan, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Sponsor and Migration. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:08, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Amazing Media for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amazing Media is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Amazing Media until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. South Nashua (talk) 18:41, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Non-free images on userpages
Hi Greasemann. Just for reference, File:Cosmo_Kramer.jpg is licensed as non-free image and Wikipedia's non-free content use policy only permits the use of non-free images in the article namespace so I have removed it per WP:UP. There are some freely licensed images of Michael Richards found at c:Michael Richards which you can use if you want. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:12, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Star Wars Battlefront II (2017), March 29 Promotional Title.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Star Wars Battlefront II (2017), March 29 Promotional Title.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Edward Burger Portrait.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Edward Burger Portrait.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text   below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Train2104 (t • c) 15:31, 29 May 2017 (UTC)