User talk:Greasy pete

Some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Spitfire Charlie may not be sufficiently well-known to merit articles of their own. The Wikipedia community welcomes newcomers, and encourages them to become Wikipedians. On Wikipedia, each user is entitled to a user page in which they can describe themselves, and this article's content may be incorporated into that page. However, to merit inclusion in the encyclopedia proper, a subject must be notable. We encourage you to write or improve articles on notable subjects. Aecis Mr.Mojorisin' 15:08, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

I repeat: do not write articles about non-notable subjects. And if you disagree with the deletion of an article, don't simply recreate it, because it will only get deleted again. If you want to argue for the subject of the article, you can do so at deletion review. Aecis Mr.Mojorisin' 18:31, 1 February 2006 (UTC)


 * templates substituted by a bot as per Template substitution Pegasusbot 04:39, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

March 2007
Please do not violate Wikipedia policy by introducing inappropriate pages, such as Stacy crouch to Wikipedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Canthusus 20:57, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Spitfirecharlie.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Spitfirecharlie.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 07:45, 24 December 2008 (UTC)