User talk:GreatLifeInService

Nomination of List of Stephen F. Austin State University people for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Stephen F. Austin State University people is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of Stephen F. Austin State University people until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  Dennis The Tiger  (Rawr and stuff) 05:14, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

April 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to  The Big Bang Theory (Family Guy), but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 13:08, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

May 2012
Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to Mitt Romney has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Wikipedia has a policy called "Wikipedia is not a crystal ball", which discourages such edits. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reference to a reliable source. Thank you. ''FYI, you're in danger of violating the three-revert rule as well. ''  Hot Stop  21:34, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Wikipedia invites everyone to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, but one or more redirects you created, such as with The Vow (2012 film), have been considered disruptive and/or malicious, and have been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thank you. Don't redirect it to the NBA Playoffs page. Zappa (talk) 10:15, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Avengers (2012 film), you may be blocked from editing. A quick review of your edit history shows blatant vandalism and addition of random, unsourced information. Stop.--Williamsburgland (talk) 02:14, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at David Stern, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Karl 334 Talk- -Contribs  15:15, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for making unsourced changes. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. 5 albert square (talk) 03:01, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

June 2012
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mitt Romney presidential campaign, 2012. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ''Stop adding Manny Pacquiao. The reference makes no mention of Romney.'' 72Dino (talk) 15:59, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Manny Pacquiao. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.  Zappa  O  Mati   20:17, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

July 2012
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lord's Resistance Army, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. bobrayner (talk) 20:36, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to First Amendment to the United States Constitution. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  Neil N   talk to me  01:51, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia
 You have been blocked for disruptive editing (adding unsourced comments - again - and refusing to take part in discussion). To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator. For alternative methods to appeal, see Appealing a block. Rjd0060 (talk) 01:01, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Citing sources properly
Hello there, recently you made some changes to the Gabby Douglas article. A few things: 1) You stated she was "a devout Evangelical Christian." and cited this but after checking the source, the work says no such thing. 2) The article you referenced was found in the very next sentence. Sources should only be listed once per article. 3) Your citation was placed before the sentence you added. Zepppep (talk) 02:38, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

August 2012
This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Nicki Minaj, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Secret account 23:46, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

So, looking at your talk page, it looks like you're having a hard time properly using sources when contributing to Wikipedia. Your edits at Nickelback had similar problems, one reference didn't lead anywhere, and another didn't seem to be reliable. From the look of all the warnings, I'd advise you to start doing better on these things, or you're probably on your way to being blocked again... Sergecross73  msg me   13:04, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

September 2012
Hello, I'm Esanchez7587. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Young Money Entertainment, but you didn't provide a reliable source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Esa nchez (Talk 2 me or Sign here) 22:01, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1996 Summer Olympics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pick-up (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:21, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Not citing sources correctly again
I recently noticed that one of your recent edits at Nickelback, specifically here, you added a source that did not support the information you added. You said they were doing a mashup album, and all you did was give a link to an unrelated music video at VH1's website. In fact, it looks like you probably did this on purpose, as it's the same exact ref given one sentence prior to the one you added.

Please don't do this. It seems you've been talked to, and even blocked, for doing this sort of thing before. Please stop, or you may get blocked again, probably for longer. Thanks. Sergecross73  msg me   22:47, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Sergecross73  msg me   23:21, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Admin discussion
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Sergecross73  msg me   20:01, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

October 2012
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Drmies (talk) 20:15, 6 October 2012 (UTC)