User talk:Great Orme Mines

Potential conflict of interest
Hello, Great Orme Mines. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Great Orme, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the COI guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.  Velella  Velella Talk 16:52, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Great Orme
I have toned down a little of the promotional tome of some of your recent edits. This is an encyclopaedia and not a tourist guide site. I also have some concerns about the main reference used. This appears to be a book, but I cannot find any ISBN number or any evidence of its publication or existence in any deposit library. Can you help either confirm that this is a publication which can be found by other readers, or alternatively substitute another reference that is more universally available. Thanks  Velella  Velella Talk 19:47, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Great orme Bronze Age Mines book
Hello,

The publication cited is a Guidebook as printed and published by Great Orme Mines Ltd. It draws on the PhD’s and Masters work done in relation to the site and the discoveries made there. Thanks. Great Orme Mines (talk) 22:13, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Conflict of Interest
Many thanks for your response and assistance on the page. It became apparent though to myself and colleagues at Great Orme Mines that editing needed to be done as the Wikipedia listing for the archaeological scheduled site of the Great Orme Mines stated it was Neolithic and later worked by Romans. Both is factually incorrect so we felt a duty of care to ensure the correct information is supplied to Wikipedia readers. Great Orme Mines (talk) 22:17, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

June 2019
There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing. Additionally, If you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block. To do so, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the text at the bottom of your talk page, replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason for thinking that the block was an error, and publish the page. N.J.A.  &#124; talk  12:41, 18 June 2019 (UTC)