User talk:Greecepwns

Canadian Championship standings
Remember the whole gigantic discussion on this page about how the format for US/Canadian soccer should look? Remember the settlement that was made? Believe it or not, Canada is involved in that as well, since they use the same format that we do in the United States. That means that it's W-L-T. Believe me, I do NOT want to go through that mess again. This has been settled. Please change it back or I'll have to do it myself. --Otav347 (talk) 00:45, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Just so you know, I don't think it's been settled at all, the CSA runs the Canadian Championship and they present the data in the order of W-D-L, so I agree with your change. The rule that otav is referring to should only apply to competitions that are governed by USSF. Canadian only competitions should be presented the same way that the CSA presents the data. NeilCanada (talk) 02:45, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
 * The idea to change it came from Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football/USA and Canada task force. NeilCanada mentioned that the CSA used W-D-L and the USSF used W-L-T, so a standard could not be made for both USSF and CSA competitions. Since the CSA is running the competition, W-D-L should be used. Greecepwns (talk) 11:59, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

American football
Hi! It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit to American football removed quite a lot of text with no explanation - not to worry, I have reverted it. If it was intentional, feel free to redo your edit, but please can you add an explanation in the edit summary so that busy-bodies like myself don't jump in and revert? Thanks! StephenBuxton (talk) 12:14, 20 June 2008 (UTC)


 * My mistake, I created an American football in the United States article with that information. I forgot to put in an edit summary and accidentally hit enter. My bad. Greecepwns (talk) 12:16, 20 June 2008 (UTC)


 * I see - if you're splitting the article, there is a procedure to follow which can be seen at WP:SPLIT. As the new page has now been created, I'll add a null edit so that the edit summary there can be corrected - you may need to do the same on the source page. StephenBuxton (talk) 12:19, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

October 2008
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Deconstructhis (talk) 01:10, 7 October 2008 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry. I do take responsibility for it, but it was not me. Someone else (my brother, to be specific) did the edit while I was logged in. Greecepwns (talk) 19:00, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Google the number
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Google the number, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 13:00, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

May 2009
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ironholds (talk) 13:00, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 24 November 2015 (UTC)