User talk:GreekSocialist100

January 2015
Hello, I'm Haminoon. I noticed that you recently removed all content from History of Czechoslovakia (1945–48), with this edit without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the page's content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Haminoon (talk) 03:30, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Page moving
Hi GreekSocialist100, I suggest you follow the steps at Moving_a_page to move a page, so that the editing history and watchlists stay intact. Regards, Haminoon (talk) 03:40, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Also, it appears your move may be contentious as it has already been discussed on Talk:History of Czechoslovakia (1945–48). If you want to re-open the discussion please use this guide: wp:rm. Haminoon (talk) 03:49, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Democratic Government of Albania
In the future I will make an actual detailed Wikipedia article on the 1944-1991 period in Albanian history, but I do not believe that the Democratic Government of Albania merits its own article, any more than the People's Republic of Albania and the People's Socialist Republic of Albania should have their own separates articles (as opposed to all three being incorporated into a single article.) --Ismail (talk) 22:14, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Tutelary. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Wojciech Jaruzelski, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Tutelary (talk) 20:18, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

January 2015
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page East Germany has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. Sum mer PhD (talk) 00:39, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. ''Your edit summaries all state that your edits are minor. The vast majority are not. Most of your edit summaries are completely unrelated to the changes you are making. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing.'' Sum mer PhD  (talk) 01:01, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Your edit summaries MUST explain what you are changing and why. If there was something misspelled and you corrected it, "Fixed spelling error." would be a sensible summary. However:
 * This was not fixing a spelling error.
 * This was not fixing a spelling error.
 * There is no information to "update" on a war 70 years ago.
 * This was not fixing a spelling error.
 * Nothing has changed regarding East Germany, so there is no information to "update".
 * Additionally, you marked all of the edits as "minor". None of them were.
 * As it stands, you seem to be using edit summaries that are wholly unrelated to what you are changing. Given pervasive vandalism and WP:POV pushing on Wikipedia, these edits come across as someone trying to escape scrutiny. - Sum mer PhD  (talk) 21:41, 12 January 2015 (UTC)