User talk:Green Stephen


 * }

July 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page The Jewish Chronicle has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://jcwatch.wordpress.com/. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 14:25, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to The Jewish Chronicle, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Ironholds (talk) 12:52, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

August 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page The Jewish Chronicle do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://jcwatch.wordpress.com. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 21:17, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

In addition to the above, you have repeatedly posted the same content after it has been removed. If you think the content should remain (apart from the unsuitable link) please discuss it on the article's talk page. Repeatedly reverting to your own version without discussion (known as "edit warring") is not accepted, and if continued can eventually lead to being blocked from editing. JamesBWatson (talk) 21:27, 7 August 2010 (UTC)


 * After writing the above comment it occurred to me that it might be helpful to point out that it is not acceptable to edit Wikipedia for the purpose of promoting an organisation, which you appear to have been doing. Calling it "vandalism" probably does not help you to understand what the problem is. If you want any further clarification please feel welcome to ask on my talk page. JamesBWatson (talk) 21:34, 7 August 2010 (UTC)