User talk:Green Tornado 4444

October 2017
Please do not add or change content, as you did at CAC/PAC JF-17 Thunder, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. "jf-17.com" is not a reliable source per Wikipedia's rules. - Tom &#124; Thomas.W talk 09:17, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Yo
Yo man make sure you got my back, a lot of confusion going on that page.

October 2017
Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Al-Zarrar. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Warning for disruptive editing (making POV changes with a misleading edit summary, see page history of article; see also page history of Al-Khalid tank and Talk:Al-Khalid tank for multiple disruptive IPs that are obviously they same user as this one...). - Tom &#124; Thomas.W talk 15:27, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Al-Zarrar. Final warning for disruptive editing and edit-warring, using both this new user account and multiple IPs all geolocating to Oman. - Tom &#124; Thomas.W talk 15:39, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Al-Zarrar shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - Tom &#124; Thomas.W talk 15:57, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Black Kite (talk) 21:30, 1 October 2017 (UTC)