User talk:Green Zero

Proposed deletion of Yuriy Yanko


The article Yuriy Yanko has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. 78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 18:35, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Yuriy Yanko


The article Yuriy Yanko has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. -- Anar  chyte   11:54, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

There is such user, after all
Hello. May I suggest that your indefinite block of my account uk:Користувач:No_such_user (followed by no less than talk page access disabling), just on the basis of "inappropriate username" was a bit hasty? I'm an experienced and trusted user on English Wikipedia (the only language where my name actually means something). I understand Ukrainian just enough to understand most of uk:ВП:ІК, and I don't see which bullet my username violates. I haven't even made a single edit, nor do I plan to edit uk.wiki (except maybe to fix some interwiki stuff), so I don't bother much, but this sort of preemptive hardblocking with an arbitrary reason is pretty appalling. No such user (talk) 12:40, 4 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Hello? I'd expect an answer, since you apparently are here. No such user (talk) 13:00, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * good evening. It was wrong block. I incorrectly interpreted the rule. I bring a sincere and big apology. Unblocked. — Green Zero   обг  16:24, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks. No hard feelings. No such user (talk) 16:01, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cree Wikipedia


The article Cree Wikipedia has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not notable. Fails WP:WEB and notability is not inherited.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Graham (talk) 08:45, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

June 2016
Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to FC Dnipro Dnipropetrovsk. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains under way. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. ''This page has been moved before. There is no indication that the WP:COMMONNAME has changed. Please start an RM if you want it to move. Either way, I think it very unlikely that the club would be referred to tautologically as Dnipro Dnipro.'' Fenix down (talk) 12:51, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Okay. — Green Zero   обг  12:54, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks, happy for an RM to start as it will need renaming at some point in the near gfuture, but there will probably be differing opinions on what the actual name should be. Fenix down (talk) 13:04, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Cree Wikipedia for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cree Wikipedia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Cree Wikipedia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Graham (talk) 03:39, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Cree Wikipedia for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cree Wikipedia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Cree Wikipedia& until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  J 947 (c)  20:15, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

MobiDev
Hello, you approached me earlier to see if I would patrol the article you created at MobiDev. Unfortunately, after looking into the article, I do not feel sufficiently familiar with the standards of company-related articles to patrol this page.

While I made the changes I felt comfortable making, the article needs more work in addition to my changes, and I feel that such work is better done by someone familiar with the subject and/or editing in the business subject areas of Wikipedia. I asked another patroller for their opinion, which overlapped with my own: there are genuine claims of notability made but the article has too much of a promotional slant at this point. (Among other things, it makes several statements that should be backed up by a better source than a press release or removed from the article)

As such, I have decided to pass on patrolling this article and leave it for someone else more familiar with the subject-matter and Wikipedia's rules and guidelines surrounding it. I hope you understand. Have a nice day, AddWitty NameHere  07:22, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of MobiDev for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MobiDev is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/MobiDev until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Thjarkur (talk) 21:14, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo MobiDev.svg
Thanks for uploading File:Logo MobiDev.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Restored MobiDev article to User:Green Zero/MobiDev
Hi Green Zero, per your email request, I've restored the MobiDev article as a userspace draft at User:Green Zero/MobiDev. Before publishing the draft, please ensure that the article contains independent reliable sources with enough significant coverage to show that MobiDev meets the notability guideline on corporations. In particular, Medium is not a reliable source, press releases are not independent sources, and simple listings do not count as significant coverage. Good luck. —  Newslinger  talk   08:12, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you! --— Green Zero   обг  08:16, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of FixThePhoto


The article FixThePhoto has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable and unsourced page which has previously been deleted. Potentially promotional."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. warmly, ezlev.  talk  19:51, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Fixthephoto-logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Fixthephoto-logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:42, 18 January 2021 (UTC)