User talk:Greencomputerscience

Your submission at Articles for creation: Red Fightback (December 25)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TipsyElephant was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Red Fightback and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Red_Fightback Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:TipsyElephant&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Red_Fightback reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TipsyElephant (talk) 01:27, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Red Fightback (December 26)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Devonian Wombat were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Red Fightback and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Red_Fightback Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Devonian_Wombat&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Red_Fightback reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Devonian Wombat (talk) 01:37, 26 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello, sorry could you please explain which part would need more independent sources? because for the ideology would it not make sense to use sources from themselves as you are only trying to prove what they say, this is what I have seen done in other wikis for ideology for example in the Communist Party of Britain wiki for the ideology section it only used sources from what they published.
 * For the strategy I used one source where they talk about their strategy and one independent source, surly that is fine because its good to show how they describe their strategy and then what others say they are doing.
 * For the public opinions, I only included independent sources, some of which where very critical of them and including a speech at the Oxford Union so I don't see how that is not a reliable source?
 * Sorry this is my first time writing a wiki article so I am not really sure on what I should be doing specifically and I don't understand what I done wrong with this wiki page, thank you. Greencomputerscience (talk) 06:19, 26 December 2022 (UTC)