User talk:Greenfields~enwiki

Regarding edits made during November 27 2006 (UTC) to Ken Bennett
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. MER-C 07:38, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Regarding your Blanking of Talk:John Huppenthal
Please stop. If you continue to blank pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --BenBurch 03:24, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Regarding your vandalism at 07:43, 27 November 2006 of Ken Bennett
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. --BenBurch 03:31, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to Ken Bennett
Your recent edit to Ken Bennett (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 21:43, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Your edits to John Huppenthal
Please stop blanking the talk page and moving it to Don't move. We will just keep reverting it. Furthermore, rather than continuously removing the NPOV tag and advertisement tags from the page WITHOUT any explanation at all, please explain your edits with either a) coherent edit summaries, or b) a post on the talk page. Clearly there is some dispute here, and I (and probably some other editors) would like to arrive at some consensus. Please join the discussion at Talk:John Huppenthal with some constructive comments. Copysan 03:59, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Don't move
I've added the "prod" template to the article Don't move, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Don't move. You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. BenBurch 04:30, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I believe that page is a fairly obvious candidate for speedy deletion (G3: pure vandalism), but prodding it should be good enough. Who knows, maybe this guy will actually respond to attempts at discussion rather than just continuing to vandalize these pages.  -- Dachannien TalkContrib 05:59, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Prior discussions on your user talk page
I have re-added prior legitimate discussions that were on your user talk page which you deleted. Note that while it is customary for one's user page to be maintained by its namesake, the user talk page is for discussions relevant to that user's edits and conduct on Wikipedia. As such, only true vandalism should be deleted, while legitimate discussions should be kept. If you wish to clean up your user talk page, please archive it rather than simply deleting the comments (especially when doing so in an attempt to hide discussion of other bad edits you have done elsewhere). -- Dachannien TalkContrib 05:48, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to John Huppenthal
Your recent edit to John Huppenthal (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 17:32, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Reason for edits
We have malicious actors who are attempting to smear Senator Huppenthal and Senator Bennett using wikipedia. Why should Wikipedia allow itself to be used for this purpose? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Greenfields (talk • contribs) 17:27, 2 December 2006
 * If you believe that untrue statements are being made in biographical articles, you need to discuss the verifiability (or lack thereof) of those statements on the talk page for the article. You've done nothing but repeatedly blank content without comment, accuse people who have made legitimate edits of vandalism, and revert legitimate edits repeatedly.  All of this has been done in violations of several Wikipedia policies.  If you work for - or are - either Senator Huppenthal or Senator Bennett, it is even more important that you have an open discussion with other Wikipedians on the topic, to ensure that the articles about them are kept truthful and verifiable.  See WP:LIVING.  Also, many of us dealing with your edits have shown a great deal of patience in waiting for you to discuss the issue, and I hope that you will return that respect by actually discussing it rather than continuing your pattern of poor edits.  -- Dachannien TalkContrib 18:43, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Greenfields. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Greenfields~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 00:16, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 13:25, 22 April 2015 (UTC)