User talk:Greenkush

The Spirit
This is not encyclopedic writing. Really, what kind of encyclopedia uses charged language and uncited opinion this way? Would this appear in Encyclopedia Brittanica? (a name reminiscent of a minstrel show joke) is an ugly reminder of the dehumanization of African-American's in the popular culture of the time. While "Ebony" certainly does not stand alone as an example of the way American pop culture continued to justify the violent oppression of African-Americans through the grotesque characterization of them as venal, dangerous, and stupid, the terrible strength of Ebony's presence as a kind of “Ur-Nigger” is reinforced by Eisner's considerable talent as a visual story-teller.

You've made over three reversions, in contradiction of WP:3RR, under this and your IP of 166.84.144.29. Two editors have reverted you, and you will not work in a community fashion but simply keep inserting your own personal opinion that this characterization is "venal, dangerous, and stupid". The existing text says clearly it is a racial stereotype of the time an addresses this important issue using neutral language as required by Wikipedia and encyclopedic writing generally.

Ad administrator is being notified, and your account will be blocked. I'm sorry you persisted in this behavior. -- Tenebrae 20:37, 3 August 2006 (UTC)