User talk:Greenmist158

July 2013
Hello, I'm EBY3221. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Wario Land: Super Mario Land 3 because it did not appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. EBY (talk) 00:49, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Hey, I undid your edit to Donkey Kong Jr. Math because that's pretty subjective of you. Looking at all your contributions, perhaps you should make edits to articles that aren't just adding weasel words to videogame reception sections. --Prince Ludwig (talk) 19:33, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm GoingBatty. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Adam Sandler because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. There's been a hoax going around for years that Sandler died - see Talk:Adam Sandler. GoingBatty (talk) 05:12, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Slow down!
Hi Greenmist158,

First, thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Your time and energy spent on editing articles is very helpful. Second, I do have to ask you to take a step back and give the guidlines a quick glance. For instance, on Luigi's Mansion, you changed "generally" to "moslty". On Crash Tag Team Racing, from "average" to "mixed to average". That's a bit redundant, don't you think? "Strong reviews" is indeed strange, but changing it "strongly positive" doesn't help. Please take a second before editing all those sentences again. Thanks, and happy editing. --Soetermans. T / C 10:53, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

September 2013
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Mario Kart 7. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. DK  qwerty     20:22, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:BmUploads 2013-07-03 3518 pac-man museum.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:BmUploads 2013-07-03 3518 pac-man museum.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 22:50, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

"Mixed to positive" again
I see this has come up before, but you're still doing it, so I figured I'd bring it up again. Its redundant to change generalizations on reviews from something like "mixed reviews to "mixed to positive reviews". "Mixed" already covers both high and low scores. It means the scores varied. I think you have to keep in mind that "mixed" is different from saying "medium" or "mediocre".

Anyways, if you think that reviews for a given game skew a little more positive than negative, it'd be better to add more positive reviews or comments in the reception section, rather than altering the wording to "mixed to positive". That's how its typically done here, and that's why people keep on undoing your changes when you do this... Sergecross73  msg me   14:01, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

February 2014
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. Stop changing the reception on articles. JDDJS (talk) 03:43, 6 February 2014. Actually i love the movie.(UTC) its not my opinion i just thought the reception was dat jeez get over it

May 2014
Hello, I'm SummerPhD. I noticed that you recently removed some content from List of Pac-Man and the Ghostly Adventures episodes without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Sum mer PhD (talk) 01:26, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)