User talk:Greentea555

Cho La incident edit warring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war at Cho La incident. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. D4iNa4 (talk) 01:59, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * Hi Greentea555, thanks for adding the badly needed academic sources to the article. Your sources are obviously better, but edit-warring will not solve the dispute. As has suggested, WP:RSN is probably the best solution. Cheers, -Zanhe (talk) 06:52, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Really, please stop reverting (except in cases of copyvio and vandalism), it'll only get you blocked. Please use dispute resolution. Regards, -Zanhe (talk) 18:51, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Please protect Cho La incident, Capitals00 is back vandalizing that page again
Hey man please take a look at the page Cho La incident. Look at who is back.

--162.74.52.147 (talk) 17:04, 16 December 2015 (UTC)