User talk:Greg013Smi

May 2014
Hello. Your recent edit to List of poets from the United States appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(talk)  14:05, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

User talk:Loriendrew                                                                                                                                           Here is my confirmation of proof of entry and verified data that you can reference. If you require further references do ask and also offer your justification for making changes to things not about your data. I clearly am offended that a fellow contributor would take it upon themselves to do this. If it was your page, I am certain you would be disquieted by its avarice and dogmatic approach. Please apologize if you take the time to look. I do deserve an opportunity before you take it upon yourself to deny a worthy person some small way to be noted. Perhaps it was without malice, but it was unfair, none the less since I did file my email and did set up an account rightly so...I just was unaware of the requirement for a biography on my page...since I was unaware I had one! Sincerely, Gregory L Smith

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to List of poets from the United States, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor".    &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;   &#9743;(talk)  16:27, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Hello. Your recent edit appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. ''
 * Please stop adding yourself to the list of poets. See the above notice for the reason for the removal. There is no malice involved, it is agrred upon policy.  &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;   &#9743;(talk)''  16:30, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

-->User:Loriendrew Regarding my so-called edits and adding my name...Why will you not allow my name to be added? Your rationalization is not justified by any of those factors identified, since I meet all those requirements. What is your justification? Is there some extra requirement other than being born in the USA and being a published poet? I do not see such a defined qualification. What is it you want, to determine my acceptability? Is it objective or subjective? I am deeply offended you can't explain it better than you have. What pre-existing article do you need?  Do I need to create this pre-existing article and also reference it for you? Why would my article not qualify for such a stand-alone article? DO you draw straws or is there a notable social cadre that defines notables for you? It certainly does not encourage creativity and does encourage one to protest. Are you an editor or some kind of gatekeeper? This borders on racial bias. I insist you explain what process needs to be achieved and in what order... Gregory L. Smith