User talk:Greg987

August 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Decibert (talk) 01:12, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Behaviorology
An article that you have been involved in editing, Behaviorology, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Melchoir (talk) 16:54, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Behaviorology
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Behaviorology. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Behaviorology. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:16, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Welcome

 * Your welcome Greg987. Let me know how I can help. It is really hard for new editors here. You maybe interested in the WP:Article Rescue Squadron to help you feel like you are a part of a group of editors who care about your contributions. Ikip (talk) 01:28, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to the Article Rescue Squadron
{| style="border: 4px solid #CC0000; padding: 6px; width: 80%; min-width: 700px; background: #FFFAF0; line-height: 20px; cellpading=30" align=center Hi,, welcome to the Article Rescue Squadron! We are a growing community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to identifying and rescuing articles that have been tagged for deletion. Every day hundreds of articles are deleted, many rightfully so. But many concern notable subjects and are poorly written, ergo fixable and should not be deleted. We try to help these articles quickly improve and address the concerns of why they are proposed for deletion. This covers a lot of ground and your help is appreciated!
 * colspan="2" |

Behaviorology
Hi Greg987, I was sorry to see Behaviorology deleted, but I think it has an excellent chance of being permitted to return to mainspace. One thing you can do is have the article admit to ambiguity in the definition of Behaviorology. Also, if you work on some other articles, you'll gain valuable editing experience that you can then use on Behaviorology. Let me know if you have any questions regarding how to find/use sources. Abductive (reasoning) 23:24, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't know the material well enough to say it is ready for a return to mainspace. You should attempt to find more sources, one for each sentence, especially the ones in the first paragraph. Then invite people from some Wikiproject, perhaps WikiProject Psychology for a critique. Then ask an admin if it could be moved back into articlespace. DGG would be a good choice for that, since he was skeptical of the original article, but is generally sympathetic to keeping articles. Abductive  (reasoning) 05:45, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter
Content


 * News items and announcements
 * Contest


 * Featured editor: Teeninvestor
 * Featured administrator: WereSpielChequers


 * Want ads
 * Feature: FeydHuxtable: Search Techniques

Rescue
Articles for deletion/Armageddon theology WritersCramp (talk) 13:11, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Los Horcones for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Los Horcones, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Los Horcones until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 19 August 2023 (UTC)