User talk:GregVolk

Hello GregVolk,

I have nominated Charles William Lucas, Jr. for deletion, and removed most of Mr. Lucas's material from Toroidal Ring Model. I can tell that you have put a lot of work into these articles, but Wikipedia is not the place to advertise new scientific theories. The correct way to gain support for a new theory is by publishing it in a mainstream, peer-reviewed journal where the bugs can be ironed out and major flaws corrected.

On the other hand, I hope to clean up and keep your interesting discussion of pre-1915 ring models; however, the article at present obviously has a highly WP:POV stance, with no mainstream support, in suggesting that the rings "should not" have been abandoned, or that there are things which the mainstream model fails to explain.

You may wish to read the Wikipedia policy pages on No original research and WP:SOURCES. On Mr. Lucas personally, Wikipedia has specific guidelines for inclusion of academics; see WP:PROF. Bm gub 23:38, 1 October 2007 (UTC)   Also, see my reply to your comments on Talk:Toroidal Ring Model. Bm gub 23:39, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Hello again GregVolk,

Please stop inserting "common sense science" links into the article Toroidal Ring Model. The fact that many pre-Dirac physicists speculated that the electron was a ring? Notable. The fact that half a dozen people with Web pages still think it is? Not notable. Please come back after (a) you've read WP:SOURCES, and (b) after one of these people publishes a peer-reviewed article in the mainstream physics literature. Bm gub (talk) 01:48, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Dissident physicists
Category:Dissident physicists, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Cgingold (talk) 20:01, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:34, 24 November 2015 (UTC)