User talk:Gregathon

Can an administrator please address the evidence I gave above?
 * Yes, but you can only have one open unblock request at a time. Daniel Case (talk) 17:54, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Ok, but can the first one that I sent be addressed? Much appreciated. Gregathon (talk) 19:03, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Gregathon (talk) 03:31, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Comment from blocking admin - The behavioral evidence is at Sockpuppet_investigations/MosMusy/Archive. These unblock requests vexatious and I'd recommend the next reviewing admin revoke talk page access.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 06:03, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Dude, I saw the investigation and debunked it. The reason it's getting vexatious for you is because I debunked this investigation's premises and you are unable to address it. Can you please at least put a cubicle of effort in trying to do so? What's really getting vexatious is having your account falsely removed, showing why it was false in front of all the administrators and getting pathetic responses like these. Gregathon (talk) 00:43, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. Daniel Case (talk) 03:57, 17 March 2021 (UTC)