User talk:Gregburm

Welcome!
Hello, Gregburm, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Janel Jorgensen have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place   before the question. Again, welcome! -- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 21:55, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 6)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:

You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Gregburm/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Gregburm Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MatthewVanitas&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Gregburm reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 17:39, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edie (Edythe) Landau (February 14)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Gregburm Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:StarryGrandma&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Gregburm reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

StarryGrandma (talk) 23:16, 14 February 2015 (UTC)


 * The article is an exact copy of the author's book bio seen at this bookstore website http://www.bookendsandbeginnings.com/book/9781559362412 and on Amazon. The article needs to be completely rewritten anyway. The style is not appropriate for an encyclopedia article. StarryGrandma (talk) 23:19, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Edie (Edythe) Landau


A tag has been placed on Draft:Edie (Edythe) Landau requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.bookendsandbeginnings.com/book/9781559362412. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. StarryGrandma (talk) 23:17, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 19)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sam Sailor was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Gregburm/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Gregburm Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sam_Sailor&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Gregburm reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- Sam Sing! 11:13, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 20)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sam Sailor was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Gregburm/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Gregburm Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sam_Sailor&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Gregburm reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- Sam Sing! 13:48, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

AfC notification: User:Gregburm/sandbox has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Gregburm/sandbox. Thanks! -- Sam Sing! 13:49, 20 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Gregburn - you were asked not to resubmit your draft until you addressed the concerns raised by the reviewer, yet you did so without so much as a single reference being added. There is a large backlog of article drafts to be reviewed and your actions are disruptive, therefore I've reverted your restoration of the review template until such a time where you address the sourcing and notability concerns.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:27, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Actually I've deleted the sandbox and the draft altogether as it was a cut and paste of this website, which constitutes a copyright violation.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:31, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: COED Media Group (February 25)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sam Sailor was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:COED Media Group and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Gregburm Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sam_Sailor&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Gregburm reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- Sam Sing! 03:15, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Block notice
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for disruptive editing. Despite a final warning you continue to recreate promotional and unsourced draft articles for the same company. If you are receiving undisclosed monetary compensation for your edits you need to know that this is against Wikipedia's WP:TOU. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:39, 25 February 2015 (UTC)


 * I've reblocked your account for two weeks for making the same edit that led to your last block. At this point I can only believe that you are attempting to force the article through for pay. If it continues you will be blocked indefinitely. -- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:44, 13 March 2015 (UTC)


 * You have to disclose a conflict of interest, and probably shouldn't edit the article if you're connected to the subject. Policy says that you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation--is writing the article part of your job, which you're getting paid for? Origamiteⓣⓒ 06:29, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for obvious use of Wikipedia for promotional purposes. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 04:44, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:COED Media Group


Hello, Gregburm. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "COED Media Group".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 08:30, 29 October 2015 (UTC)