User talk:Greggydude

Administrator intervention against vandalism report
Thank you for your report on 208.71.184.41 at Administrator intervention against vandalism. You are quite right in that this IP address has been repeatedly used for vandalism. However, since many IP addresses may be used by many different users, we do not normally block IP addresses unless the vandalism is still actively taking place, whereas in this case the last edits were two days ago. Please don't let this put you off from making vandalism reports in the future, but I though it would help to explain why no action was being taken on this one. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:04, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Rephrase that?
Might I convince you to rephrase this a little? Hans Adler was perhaps a bit sarcastic and frustrated in making his point, but there should be no need to take the discussion to a personal level. Better solutions might include: ignore it (my personal favorite); politely request that discussion focus on concrete suggestions for improvement, per the Talk page guidelines; or make a request at User talk:Hans Adler similar to this posting of mine. He is all around generally reasonable, and I believe that he genuinely wants Homeopathy to portray an accurate and encyclopedic overview of the topic. Thank you for your consideration, - 2/0 (cont.) 23:54, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Done. You're right. At that moment I, too was frustrated. Anyway thanks for leaving a comment! Greggydude (talk) 18:19, 28 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks for rephrasing - collaborative disagreement is much more pleasant than the vitriol and wild accusations that were flying over there about two years ago. Best of luck, - 2/0 (cont.) 08:39, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:2017 Logo of the Congressional Progressive Caucus.png
Thanks for uploading File:2017 Logo of the Congressional Progressive Caucus.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:02, 7 July 2018 (UTC)