User talk:Gregh

h
H stand for Hilton?


 * Yep, Greg Hilton. Who is this and why are you asking? Gregh 15:34, 9 February 2007 (UTC)


 * I'm Jim Hickson, i'm in year 11 now...but i have no idea how i stumbled across your user area.....straaaange. I know you just cos i do, you're like the master of sports, becky diamonds boyfriend...how the hell do i know all this?! Rick Lloyd talks about you often maybe thats where... JimHxn 16:32, 9 February 2007 (UTC)


 * I don't recognise the name "Jim Hickson", but I would probably recognise your face. Yeah I'm Becky's boyfriend (still, haha). Who's Rick Lloyd? Do you mean Richard, or...? As for master of sports, mhmm, strange. I was pretty good at athletics but I certainly didn't care for sports. I'm more academic than that. Where have you got that idea from? If its easier to talk to me on MSN messenger rather than me keep ruining your wikipedia page then add me at gregthegod@hotmail.com Gregh 11:47, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:JimHxn"


 * Well i dunno i just pieced info from different places, although i'm pretty sure you were the computer geek? Richard Lloyd fat one, glasses, extremly violent, especially when it comes to rugby. And nah, i didn't really know you, there's no point, don't mind you writin on my talk space. JimHxn 14:16, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Notability of Autograph (Software)
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Autograph (Software), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Autograph (Software) seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Autograph (Software), please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 18:06, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Autograph-maths-software-logo.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Autograph-maths-software-logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 16:17, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Jokela school shooting
Hey. I am happy to see the article improved and images are one way to do that, but unfree images of ordinary buildings are never allowed per WP:NFCC. Thanks, Prolog 17:22, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The picture of the perpetrator most likely meets Wikipedia's policies on non-free images, especially since it is currently impossible to go and just take a picture of him. There are over a million people living near Tuusula, so it should not be hard at all to get a free image of the school. Maybe there even already is one. In the meantime, this image could be added although it is not free if the article later contains more information on the YouTube controversy. Prolog 17:31, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I'll wait and see how the article develops before uploading anything myself. For example, Seung-Hui Cho has many non-free images but the article also contains so much relevant information that the usage of them all is justified. Happy editing, Prolog 17:44, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Jokelan_Lukio.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Jokelan_Lukio.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:25, 7 November 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —  pd_THOR  undefined | 17:25, 7 November 2007 (UTC)