User talk:Greghenderson2006/Archive 2

November 2019 - Elwood Walter, No. 7 moved to draftspace
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kvng was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Elwood Walter, No. 7 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Elwood Walter, No. 7, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Elwood_Walter,_No._7 Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kvng&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Elwood_Walter,_No._7 reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~Kvng (talk) 18:07, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

My response to Kvng
Thanks for your review. I've made some changes per your suggestion and was wondering if you want to take a look at it now or should I resubmit it. You say in your review of Elwood Walter, No. 7 draft article that, "The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Sandy Hook pilot."

I have addressed these issues and feel it now has sufficient content because:
 * 1) the pilot ship Elwood Walter No. 7 was one of the earliest pilot boats that was built duing the 1860's, which is citated by good secondary sources.
 * 2) The article is an example of a Sandy Hook pilot boat that was given a pilot number "seven" by the New York Merchants' Pilot Association.
 * 3) The text and sources are on par with other wiki articles, e.g. William Bell, No. 24, Pet, No. 9, etc.
 * 4) I've added a citation to the burning of the ship Wabamo, which was rescued by the pilot boat Elwood Walter.
 * 5) Provided secondary sources from Charles Edward Russell and image of ship.

Reply from Kvng
Your changes have indeed focused the article on the vessel so it is now more difficult to make a good case for merging the content to Sandy Hook Pilot. Standalone articles must meet WP:GNG. There are a lot of offline sources cited but the online material I see here does not give the required in-depth coverage of the vessel to meet this requirement. See WP:OTHERSTUFF for an explanation why the existence of similar articles is not necessarily a good argument for creating this one. Your work has improved the draft and I would suggest you resubmit it to have another reviewer take a look at it. ~Kvng (talk) 14:31, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Resubmitted for review
I have made the following additional changes to Draft of Elwood Walter, No. 7: Greg Henderson 17:38, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Added direct citation for The New York Times Memorandum
 * 2) Added citation for New York Morning Courier
 * 3) Added secondary source from Charles Edward Russell
 * 4) Added online citation for Shipbuilding and the Nascent Community of Greenpoint
 * 5) Added online citation for Ellwood Walter, No. 7, taking off the crew
 * 6) Added image of Elwood Walter, No. 7
 * 7) Added references to other wikipedia pilot boats, et. George W. Blunt, No. 11