User talk:GregorB/Archive 3

Island of Vukovar
You are having answer on article talk page--Rjecina (talk) 22:34, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Re: Untagged Croatia articles
I meant deleting the WP Europe banner and adding the new WP Croatia banner, as most of these articles don't fall within the scope of WP Europe, but landed in its category as the WP Croatia banner was instated. I have outlined this at the Category:Untagged WikiProject Croatia articles. Admiral Norton (talk) 23:33, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
 * One thing though, when tagging talk pages of sportspeople, don't forget to add Template:WPBiography and its fields like living=yes or no, |sports-work-group=yes etc. Thanks, Punkmorten (talk) 10:03, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Mario Ančić
Hej, vidim da si napisao na projektu HR da netko pomogne oko peer reviewa oko texta. Ne znam koliko dugo si ovde, znas li nekog tko bi mogao pomoći da pogleda text? Dosta sam radio na njemu, mislim da je bolji od B klase. :) --Göran S (talk) 23:40, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of SFera (Romania)
A tag has been placed on SFera (Romania) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. TN X Man 19:02, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Anti-Croat circles
Hi, Gregor. What was wrong here ? These (anti-Croat circles) were the politicians that abolished many football clubs and even destroyed their archives under the lame excuse "they collaborated with enemy". These clubs were "guilty" for the sole reason that they decised to exist in despite of difficult wartimes. Kamarad Walter (talk) 21:27, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks
Hi GregorB, and thank you for the invitation! Yes, I am interested in joining the WikiProject Croatia but just dont know if I am ready yet, because I am still learning all the Wiki rules (there are so many of them). I guess it is up to you to decide, since you noticed my edits. Thanks again! --Kebeta (talk) 15:28, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

It is done. Regards. --Kebeta (talk) 16:20, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Question? I know how an article has been rated as Stub (or Start or ...)-Class on the quality scale, but I dont understand how an article has been rated on the importance scale. Who decide how an article is important. Is it a consensus or...? --Kebeta (talk) 16:32, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Understood. I will ask for an assessment at the WP Croatia talk page for some articles (when I get some time), because I think lots of Croatia-related articles are underestimated, especially concerning history. Regards.--Kebeta (talk) 18:33, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for your message and for your help with Dejan Vojnovic. Punkmorten (talk) 10:03, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Axis order of battle at Stalingrad
I've I remove the Wikiproject Germany tag, does that mean, it never hapened and German soldiers were never at Stalingrad? How great it would be if we could remove the Wikiproject Germany from the Hitler, Goebbels and Himmler articles and be rid of them once and for all out of our history! Don't plame you for taking the Wikiproject Croatia tag off, I too wish 1933 to 1945 were wiped from history! EA210269 (talk) 04:39, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
 * No worries, I just read the word tenuous, which, I had to check it up, redirects to Doubt. And there can be little doubt that Croatian forces were there. Whether you want the page to be part of Wikiproject Croatia is your choice, I'm not a member and therefore don't really want to interfere there, thats why I havn't reverted you. Hope I havn't upset you to much, it wasn't intended, have a good day, EA210269 (talk) 14:43, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:World War II personal accounts
Category:World War II personal accounts, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Black Falcon (Talk) 22:45, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Anti-communist Volunteer Militia and V.A.C.
V.A.C. It is a duplicate of Anti-Communist Volunteer Militia, but it's much more detailed, so I'd suggest taking the content from V.A.C. and incorporating it into Anti-Communist Volunteer Militia. Once this process is finished, merge tags can be removed and V.A.C. can be made to redirect to the target article. See Help:Merging and moving pages or ask me if you need help. GregorB (talk) 14:29, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

I'll merge the two articles but unfortunately some moderator yet delated V.A.C.

- never mind - thank you for restoring the article

I disagree on the name of Anti-Communist as in the original italian it is "Anti Comunista" the hyphen is a later error of some author. the political name, used by the fascist party administration, was "Anti Communist Volunteer Militia" but the military usual denomination was Bande V.A.C. as "Bande" is the term used by italian military for irregular auxiliary forces, see the colonial italian Army use for this I would suggest a name for the Wiki article as "Anti Communist Volunteer Militia - Bande V.A.C." merging the two names

thank you for your attention, regards

Cunibertus (talk) 20:35, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

ok, in this event I'll provide to a common definite version as soon as I'll have free time

I was thinking about a tripartition of the contents according the three enlistment areas of Montenegro, Dalmatia/Bosnia and Slovenia who also had different histories

see you soon

Cunibertus (talk) 16:35, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Needing help
Hi, sorry to disturb but I need the help from an administrator

Cunibertus (talk) 20:22, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Yup

Cunibertus (talk) 20:34, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

well, surely to know how to act or replay will be useful as I really don't know what to do



who is the one I can submit my case ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cunibertus (talk • contribs) 21:25, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

yes, I asked on the italian wiki what a socketpuppet is, as a litteral translation was a nonsense

but I'm not not

is it so enough to have replayed on that page ?

Cunibertus (talk) 22:19, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

I see, thank you but what have I to do now ? simply to ignore the thing ?

Cunibertus (talk) 23:30, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

I have just put it on the watchlist as you suggested thank you Cunibertus (talk) 23:56, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Dejan Vojnović
--Dravecky (talk) 18:34, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Disappointment
Hi, sorry if I write to you, but I don't want to flood the project page with my lamentations. So you're the lucky one who will be annoyed :D. Of course, if even you will tink I'm an 'intruse', you can just ignore this post, I'll survive. :)

I'm en enthusiastic contributor of the Wikipedia project, and in general I support any wiki project in any language I understand, from ages. I'm active mainly in it.wiki, where I registered the Yuma account, as it is the language I can master in the best way, and that's the reason because it happens that I'm a sysop on that wiki. But I consider myself a contributor of the whole project, and since I have a global account I do what I can with that same account anywhere I'm able to do something, spending the time I have in making some effort to contribute in collecting and developing free content. I never said I'm Italian, or Swiss, or whatever. My nationality is irrelevant: I'm a wikipedian, here. I completely agree with the philosophy of this project, beginning from the five pillars. Usually, I don't edit so much on geography articles. My interests are more 'humanistics', though I'm a wikignome on everything.

It happens, a few weeks ago, that I found an incredible rise of anger from some it.wiki editors, about a supposed anti-italian approach on the english side. Since I felt it like an absurd issue, and since I feel myself not just an it.wiki user, I tried to understand. I thougt that issue was untrue, and unjust, and basically the result of a case of trolling. The next time I logged in here, I took a look on some articles, and I found some little problems on bilingual articles. The best way to fight trolling is to eliminate the 'material' on which trolls keep feeding. That's why I pointed it, at first, to the editor. His response was harsh and non so satisfating, so I asked to the wikiproject.

Now, I'm not used to flame, but I realize that, in posting there, I probably was offending some sensitivity. But I did'nt expected to be treated as an intruse. I'm higly disappointed. We are writing an encyclopedia, we must find the most correct way to add info. But if some issues has the clear purpose of hiding as much as we can some info (today the 'italian' toponyms, tomorrow something else), I can't see the difference with the people coming here for 'exalting' such data. I probably mistaken in the way I noted it, but I'm used to be honest, and to tell what I think. Did I was offensive?

By the way, I think I rised a problem, and I contributed enough in analysing it. Sorry if I was 'intrusive'. I will try to abstain from the project page, since someone thiks I have no right to 'make lectures' (and since I'm able to keep myself cool, but sometime it's tiring). I'm confident that there is a lot of excellent users, and you will find the best way to handle it.

If you read all the 'paper'... thanks for your patience! :) --Yuma (talk) 13:47, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Sorry GregorB, we need to find a solution. Pio, Bruno and the others are out. This war must stop. We are not asking to have all the Istrian pages like the Bolzano page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bolzano, but we are asking to have the possibility to insert, without starting an edit war, the official name of the Istrian cities that are officially bilingual, as I explained here: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Croatia&diff=prev&oldid=284177913. This can be done only with consensus of most. Can you try to explain the situation to the others? --Grifter72 (talk) 16:10, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Humm... I don't know very well Grifter so I don't know if I must be glad or not about sentences beginning with we... By the way, I see an increasing aggressive statements against me in the talk page of the wikiproject. I definitely suspend any further contribution on that page. See you around. --Yuma (talk) 16:40, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I feel like a murderer at the victim's funeral... nevertheless, I feel I must comment on Yuma's post since it appears to concern me. A Wikipedian's mettle can be seen in the way he handles criticism (constructive or no). I myself don't do so well there and am admittedly aggressive in discussion at times, however, I don't think this was one of those instances. In my opinion, Alasadair was somewhat unnecessarily harsh towards Yuma who seems to sincerely desire to help with this issue. No major incidents occurred, though, and all this boils down to a few "not-so-perfectly-friendly" posts. Hardly a cause for all-out "disappointment with everything".
 * As for this subject, and I cannot stress this enough, it is highly controversial. If you think this is bad Yuma, have a look at Talk:Kosovo, the hate is seeping out of every written word. That was Dalmatia/Istria ten months back, and you've just jumped into it: you have to be prepared for some harshness of tone, a few months there and you lose your temper and reputation but gain a cardiac disorder :P. I'll just say again, in conclusion, that the matter is controversial and that consensus needs to be reached properly before anyone forces any decisions. -- DIREKTOR  ( TALK ) 19:52, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Re:
Many thanks. I'll observe, and think about. :) --Yuma (talk) 00:27, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Tagging templates for speedy deletion
Hi there. I just deleted Template:Babel-6 which you have tagged for speedy deletion. In future, please remember to put the db-tag in -tags to avoid transclusion on other people's pages. Regards  So Why  10:07, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

MOS:DERM
I am working on a manual of style for dermatology-related content, and am looking to create a list of suggested sections for biographies about dermatologists (see Category:Dermatologists for example articles). With that being stated, I wanted to know if someone from the biography project would consider helping me? ---kilbad (talk) 18:34, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

CQC7 redirect
Thank You for fixing that, Hvala! --Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 14:42, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Antun Branko Šimić
Sorry for the oversight, I've added WP Croatia PRODUCER (talk) 18:06, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

Sinagoga
Super je članak ispao. Roberta i ja smo bili u muzeju i baš smo slikali sve što imaju o sinagogi. Ako ti treba još nešto iz Muzeja grada Zagreba (ili nešto iz Zagreba) za neki članak, samo javi budemo pronašli :) Pozdrav. --Ex13 (talk) 21:16, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * NP, svaki dan prolazim tamo pa ću okinuti, iako možda imam negdje spremljeno na nekom CD:) --Ex13 (talk) 20:58, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
 * GregorB, želim se ja tebi zahvaliti za trud oko članka, pogledat ću ima li još koja prihvatljiva fotografija, ili su to sve koje su mi se učinile zadovoljavajuće. Lijep pozdrav :-)) --Roberta F. (talk) 09:43, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 * E super :) Moja druga fotka na naslovnici en:wiki. Čestitam ti na članku --Ex13 (talk) 19:58, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Slika je tako-tako :) Nešto me zeza program za izradu panoramskih fotografija. A svakako je bolja, nego nikakva :) Ako ćeš još nešto trebati pokriti fotkom, samo mi javi. --Ex13 (talk) 08:27, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Ida
You are aware of the article Ida (Darwinius massillae)? --NorwegianBluetalk 19:12, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, I wasn't until now... Is there a problem? (Apart from the fact that it is the third article on the same subject...) GregorB (talk) 19:19, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Not really, only that the three need to be merged, and the one I linked to is the most complete one. --NorwegianBluetalk 19:21, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

WP:FAS
Thanks! Sandy Georgia (Talk) 23:20, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Category:Kingdom of Croatia
Hi GregorB, can you help me with Category:Kingdom of Croatia. I never made a category, can you fix what ever needs to be fixed. Thanks. --Kebeta (talk) 18:43, 7 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks! Yes you are right, definition makes the category span something like 10 centuries of Croatian history, but if (when) that come to a problem, we can make Subcategories. But, maybe this category will not be allowed after 1102, so it won't be a problem. Regards. --Kebeta (talk) 19:21, 7 June 2009 (UTC)


 * In Template:History of Croatia there are Medieval Croatian state and Kingdom of Croatia. Both of them lead to the same article: Kingdom of Croatia (Medieval). Should we deleted one of them? --Kebeta (talk) 20:17, 7 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Yes, they were probably two different articles before. If you look at article History of Croatia, you will see two different sections: Medieval Croatian state (until 925) and Kingdom of Croatia (925-1102). Both of them are now part of one main aricle Kingdom of Croatia (medieval). So, we should fix that too? --Kebeta (talk) 20:52, 7 June 2009 (UTC)


 * O.k. Thanks! --Kebeta (talk) 21:30, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Like you said, maybe the best is, to wait for things to settle eventually. Regards. --Kebeta (talk) 15:02, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

OOK
You are invited to join WP:WPOOK.

The Transhumanist 23:48, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Popular pages
I'd reckon that it would be best to request it when we reach 1000 articles. We may as well make the most of the bot run if we apply for it! Almost halfway there already! Sillyfolkboy (talk) (edits) WIKIPROJECT ATHLETICS NEEDS YOU!  22:55, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

I think you need a
You deserved it! --Kebeta (talk) 21:09, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Brioni vs. Brijuni
You claim that Brijuni is the most common name of the Brionian islands in Modern English. As you are not a native English speaker, I would like you to provide a source for that claim, please. Thanks. 64.191.211.54 (talk) 13:32, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

P.S. Not to mention that you may have a bias ;) 64.191.211.54 (talk) 13:32, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I'll respond on the article's talk page. GregorB (talk) 14:42, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

German pin maps
Hi see my proposal on the German location template talk page. Dr. Blofeld       White cat 11:57, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Check out this. Looks good I think. We'll see how it looks with two condensed maps. Dr. Blofeld       White cat 19:14, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Any chance you can translate Antun Vrančić? Dr. Blofeld       White cat 19:26, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Advice
Can you advise me how to go about this issue. Even if the topic may not be of your particular interest, please give me some advice on how to proceede about this, the article's talk page is aslo informative.


 * I. Š. "contrib" with edit summary: "remove pointless redundancy in the lead"


 * my latest contrib

Imbris (talk) 20:55, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Talk:Serbo-Croatian language
Why should we write Serbo-Croatian in SR Croatia (the article) and other similar cases?

Did you see the discussion at Hey, Slavs in relation to the SC issue? I have found out that at books.google the 10% of books use the term Croato-Serbian. Why should this encyclopaedia differ?

Did you see:
 * Centralized discussion/Macedonia/other articles ?
 * Centralized discussion/Macedonia/international organizations ?
 * Centralized discussion/Macedonia/Greece-related ?
 * Centralized discussion/Macedonia/other page titles ?
 * Centralized discussion/Macedonia/main articles ?

Do we need that for the settlement of the SC issue?

BTW Mr. DIREKTOR belive that Bosniaks, Croats, and Serbs are one nation with one singular language.

Imbris (talk) 21:28, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

The article is under SC name
What more DIREKTOR and I. Š. would want. I hope that you realize, that by various Wiki policies the RfC can "decide" (in fact give an unbounding agreement) only on the article under which the RfC were requested. The RfC on SC/CS in the SC article is not bounding for all the other articles on wikipedia. Mr. DIREKTOR deliberately disclosed only his "search" on google, but not on books.google.

Here is a very important diff from the past where Mr. DIREKTOR wrote about the bos, hrv , and also srp as being non-existant — because there is only Serbo-Croatian (by his POV). Also he describes in the same diff (slightly below his POV on languages) the POV on nations, he describes as the TRUTH (he writtes a lot of capital letters) his own POV that Bosniaks, Croats, (I presume he included the Montenegrins also) and Serbs are one nation.

It might be Ok to use the "name" of the article Serbo-Croatian in most cases but in all cases. Why? SR Croatia was not Estonian SSR (and other Baltic states) where Russian was forced as official.

Please reconsider the implications on the sources and reliability.

Imbris (talk) 21:21, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Wine article review
Many thanks for your kind review of the Croatian Wine article, and for your corrections to my beginner's wikipedese. You are perfectly right - I need to do more research on the wine producers, and I'll be very happy to do so! Cheers! Farscot (talk) 00:48, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

(Random comment)
HA! like i give a crap, im not going to read any of your damn messages so don't waste your time writing on my page. and don't read me the damn rules when im clearly right. DAMN PUNK 76.16.43.108 (talk) 05:54, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Fell running events
There is a CfR now well underway at Categories_for_discussion/Log/2009_July_31 as was indicated on the Category CfR tag. I suggest you revert your speedy and let the process wrap up.Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:29, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

AFD?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_Collier_Township_shooting

Is this an article that should be deleted? If there is news about it in a few months, then maybe it can be re-created. Acme Plumbing (talk) 03:15, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

GNG
WP:GNG and WP:NOTNEWS conflicts. The hot news of total will have significant coverage. Some murder articles have been deleted because of NOTNEWS and BLP1E (even if the person died and is not living). I don't understand why articles are treated differently. People say WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS but that is just an excuse for unequal treatment. I have nothing against the LA Fitness murder. Wikipedia should just make up its mind. Acme Plumbing (talk) 03:26, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Klis Fortress
Hi, GregorB! I have nominated article Klis Fortress to be assessed as B-Class on Military history WikiProject. The article has been checked yes against the all criteria for B-Class status, except for grammar. Can you take a quick look and fix grammar errors in the article, or recommend some other good copy editor who has knowledge of the subject. Thanks. --Kebeta (talk) 10:37, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Croatian footballers
Hi Gregor. As you noteced ( since you´ve made the Talk pages) I´m making many footballer pages, maynly the ones that have played in Serbia and ex-Yugoslavia. I did a new one: Marijan Zovko. But I have some doubts... This time I did the Talk page. I did it as you did one other before, Davor Čop, is it OK? Whenever I do some Croatian player I´ll do it this way, should I? Another thing is about the player itself. I´m not sure if you´re the one I should ask you this stuff, couse I´m not sure you like or not football, but I´m missing all the manager years and teams of Marijan Zovko couse I can´t find more either by net or by the literature I have. I know he has been coaching many teams in Croatia. Do you know more that I missed? And, maynly, he´s named Marijan, but I also find some places where is written Marjan (without i ). Did I do it wright, Marijan, and not Marjan? If you don´t know, or don´t have time to help me, don´t warry, I´ll do further reserch in the future. Thanx anyway. Pozdrav. FkpCascais (talk) 00:18, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanx Gregor for answering me. The thing was that in the begining I didn´t used to do the talk pages cause I touth some WikiProject "leaders" are the ones that give them the low/or other "ocene". But then some other fellow wikipedian told me do it if it wasn´t too much work... So, since then, when starting a page, I try to do it as complete as possible. Please feel free to contact me whenever in need of any kind of help, and also, I already said the same to Timbouctou, feel free to complete or correct, if necessary, those pages. Regards. FkpCascais (talk) 14:46, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

Notice
Hi. I'm posting to let you know that your name has been mentioned on a list of Highly active users on the talk page for RfA's here. If you are interested in running for administratorship, or if you would like to make any comments, feel free to join the discussion. -- Soap Talk/Contributions 17:38, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

Proofreading
Hi there. Would you have time to please proofread this croatian article? The article is short and thus it won't take much time. Thanks very much. Amsaim (talk) 13:48, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Pozdrav
Trebam jednu malu pomoć, zapravo tvoj komentar.

Naime napravio sam predložak, dok LAz17 i DIREKTOR uporno redirectaju na Urban Rail transportation in the former Yugoslavia ovo iako to uopće nije ista vrsta predloška. Naime, moj predložak se bavi tramvajskim prometom u Hrvatskoj, sadašnjim, bivšim, kao i tipovima tramvaja koji prometuju, npr. TMK 2200.

Zamolio bih te za mišljenje na Template talk:Urban Rail transportation in the former Yugoslavia. Hvala--Ex13 (talk) 17:45, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:"
Template:" has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Hairy Dude (talk) 16:41, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Re: The Barnstar of National Merit
After three days in countryside, away from computer, I found some good and some bad surprises. As you can guess, your Barnstar was good (best) surprise. Thanks GregorB! --Kebeta (talk) 20:15, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Postal codes in Croatia
with reference to http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Postal_codes_in_Croatia&diff=next&oldid=319331060

do you know how to bring numbers into an SVG? and to unite Zagreb Grad i Zagreb zupanija? TrueColour (talk) 22:39, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

copy edit
Hi Gregor, I noticed your copy edit at Josip_Hatze and the editor from that article was asking me to review Peter_Kanavelic as I am not much of a reviewer, would you have a look at this article too, when you have time, thanks. Off2riorob (talk) 11:04, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi Gregor I'm a friend of "Off2riorob". Would like some feedback on the articles I worked on & many thanks for your copy-edit work! Ps I having troubles finding good references for Southern Dalmatia (Croatia). Sir Floyd (talk) 00:22, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the offer off help. Well I'm trying to write about a large cave on the island of Korcula. It's called Vela Spila (Big Cave) . Can't find much in the references department. To my own personnel knowledge, their has been some major discoveries (in old the cave). Guess I'll have to work with what I got. Cheers Sir Floyd (talk) 09:06, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi GregorB! I've done my first draft of Vela Spila. Could you please take a look at it and maybe copy-edited. I want to expand on the article in the near future. Also I've been trying to improve older articles on Wiki (Korcula/Vela Luka). If you got some time could you please take a look at them. In order for them to be tidy up even more so, I feel they need a set of fresh eyes. Plus you got the right stuff to do it. Regards Sir Floyd (talk) 02:54, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Article moves
Hi, you left a message on my talk page about my article move concerning Stadion Maksimir. I did it because it seemed inconsistent to have the majority of articles about Croatian stadiums named the way they are originally called in Croatian (like Gradski stadion u Poljudu or Stadion Šubićevac) with only some of them retaining English translations in article names (like Maksimir Stadium or Kantrida Stadium). If you look at lists such as the list of Spanish stadiums, list of French stadiums or list of Italian stadiums, you will see that 99 percent of articles are named according to their original name in the native language. Granted, there are a few exceptions to this, such as Santiago Bernabéu Stadium or Vicente Calderón Stadium, but it seems that the general tendency is to keep the original name, even though you could find English-language sources for venues such as Stade de France or Stade Vélodrome if you wanted to. Having that said, I don't think that WP:UE applies here as the rules you cited concern foreign names and transliteration, which is not the issue here. The issue here lies with whether to use English-language formatting or keep the original one (whether Croatian venues should be called Stadion XXX or XXX Stadium). In my opinion it should be the former as I think we should try to stick with the official name of the venue as precisely as possible (which is also the reason I moved Stadion Kranjčevićeva to Stadion u Kranjčevićevoj ulici as it is it's full official name), but if you still disagree we could look for help at WP Football to resolve this. Cheers :-) Timbouctou (talk) 17:02, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Walls of Dubrovnik
You are fast as thunderbolt! Thanks for work/help on the Walls of Dubrovnik. Cheers, Kebeta (talk) 21:37, 4 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks and congratulations on Walls of Dubrovnik! --Kebeta (talk) 23:27, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Our Lady of Angels/Lumbardian Decree-Psefizam
Hi GregorB! I was wonering if you could you please work your magic (copy edit) on my two new articles: Our Lady of Angels/Lumbardian Decree-Psefizam. Thanks Sir Floyd (talk) 13:08, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Tko mari za cari.jpg)
 Thanks for uploading File:Tko mari za cari.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 23:17, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

1981 Croatia statistics
Thank you for providing that information. The economic development of the Yugoslav republics is actually something that really interests me. Would your atlas have per capita info on cities in the former Yugoslavia? (I'm interested in the capitals so mainly Belgrade, Zagreb, Sarajevo, Skopje, Ljubljana, Podgorica and maybe some other big cities such as Novi Sad, Split, Banja Luka)? Also do you have data on the ethnic make up on the big cities of Croatia such as Zagreb, Split, Rijeka, Osijek, Zadar, Pula, Slavonski Brod, Karlovac, Sisak, Varazdin etc.? If you can provide me with this data I would be very grateful. Best Regards Yugo91aesop (talk) 18:48, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Woah. That information was golden. Could I perhaps get the average gdp (Yugoslavia 100) for the following cities. I know it is asking a lot.

Slovenia: Ljubljana, Maribor, Kranj, Celje, Koper, Novo Mesto, Nova Gorica, Velenje, Domzale, Slovenska Bistrica, Krsko, Kamnik, Brezice, Ptuj, Skofja Loka, Jesenice, Zalec Croatia: Zagreb, Split, Rijeka, Osijek, Zadar, Slavonski Brod, Pula, Karlovac, Varazdin, Sibenik, Sisak, Vinkovci, Dubrovnik, Vukovar, Bjelovar, Koprivnica, Pozega, Dakovo Bosnia: Sarajevo, Banja Luka, Zenica, Tuzla, Mostar, Bihac, Brcko, Prijedor, Bijeljina, Doboj, Travnik, Trebinje, Bugujno, Gorazde Serbia: Belgrade, Nis, Kragujevac, Smederevo, Leskovac, Krusevac, Cacak, Valjevo, Kraljevo, Sabac, Novi Pazar, Uzice, Zajecar, Vranje, Pozarevac, Pirot, Bor, Jagodina, Prokuplje, Smederevska Palanka, Paracin, Arandelovac, Gornji Milanovac, Obrenovac, Lazarevac, Mladenovac, Cuprija, Loznica Vojvodina: Novi Sad, Subotica, Zrenjanin, Pancevo, Sombor, Kikinda, Sremska Mitrovica, Vrsac, Ruma, Backa Palanka, Indija, Vrbas, Becej, Senta Kosovo: Pristina, Prizren, Pec, Kosovska Mitrovica, Urosevac, Gniljane, Dakovica, Podujevo, Montenegro: Podgorica, Niksic, Herceg Novi, Cetinje Macedonia: Skopje, Bitola, Kumanovo, Prilep, Veles, Stip, Tetovo, Ohrid, Gostivar, Strumica, Kicevo, Kavadarci, Kocani

If you don't want to do all of them then I'm happy with the ones just in bold too. Those are towns with populations of over 50,000. The rest goes down to 20,000. I'm gonna incorporate this into articles on the cities so it won't be for a lost cause. If you can give me this info then I will be extremely grateful. Yugo91aesop (talk) 03:17, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks a ton and looking forward to the rest:) Yugo91aesop (talk) 04:16, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Could I get the 1981 gdp per capita of the following municapilities in Yugoslavia. Serbia: Priboj, Svetozarevo, Knjazevac, Apatin, Kula, Temerin, Stara Pazova, Futog, Negotin, Trstenik, Aleksinac, Sid, Vlasotince, Velika Plana, Backa Topala, Prijepolje Montenegro: Bar, Berane, Bijelo Polje, Pljevlja, Ulcinj, Tivat Croatia: Krapina, Kutina, Petrinja, Ogulin, Koprivnica, Krizevci, Virovitica, Pozega, Knin, Kastela, Sinj, Cakovec A lota these you might not be able to find since the municipalities have changed since then especially in Croatia but if you can get me these stats i'd appreciate it. Do it whenever u feel like it cuz i know its annoying to go through. Thanks! Yugo91aesop (talk) 20:59, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Cara & Don Marko Bon of Zrnovo
Check this out [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Sir_Floyd/Čara Research by Marko Marelic-S. Francisco/USA]. I'm writing an article on an old Croatian Village called Cara (work in progress). Would love some input-please. I'm wondering if Mr Marko Marelic's work is ok for Wiki. Also I've written a chapter on an all round tough guy "Don Marko Bon of Zrnovo". I would like to add this to the Korcula page, if it's suited of course. Thanks Sir Floyd (talk) 00:49, 25 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Hi GregorB! Any change of a copyedited (when you got some free time) on my new article Čara, please. Regards Sir Floyd (talk) 01:55, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Extra Notes: Sir Floyd (talk) 02:14, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Google Translate-links not working properly?
 * Google search-no hits on Cara?

Battle of Pákozd
Thanks for rating that. I didn't know whether I should include it under Croatia at all, and another editor has removed the, no problem with that, it's easier that you get sight of it and remove it than that you never see it at all.

We're still in the middle of translating it, we have the top and tail but there is a battle missing, so if you think it is of any importance to your project at all, I should like to resubmit it again probably at the end of today (London time here). I don't mind if it still stays stub-class, but was perhaps premature for me to add the tag, and thus premature for you to assess it. Didn't realise it would be so quick!

I realise this is may be better put on the WikiProject Croatia page, and don't mind if you move it there, but I'm not and don't want to be involved in that project (not for any reason except I am concentrating on Hungary) so I talk to you personally first.

There is something you may be able to point me in the right direction: I am trying to get boundary coordinates right for and I naively used the Croatian map, but Modrus-Fiume seems to have expanded a bit and Lika-Krbava is not the southern extent of Croatia (as it was for Kingdom of Hungary) so those coords are basically bollox. They do not have to be very precise, only to one decimal point, so if you happen to know of a town or mountain or something in those places that I could get a good fix off of that would be great. I have tried searching but cocked it up, I will continue to refine it (currently Budapest comes out too far northeast) but if you had a good e.g. seaside resort it would save my just doing it by brute force.

Very best wishes Si Trew (talk) 09:38, 11 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks by the way for your very useful edit summaries. It makes a great deal of difference when it is done that way, in good faith one then accepts the edit without needing to check. THe section on the battle will be added shortly. We could not do this in a sandbox etc. cos we wanted to preserve the edit history, for the little that was there. Si Trew (talk) 12:45, 11 December 2009 (UTC)


 * On the other hand, if you are a deletionist who simply marks things that need improvement without actually adding any content, and does not reply to queries about your edits, then I have no time for you and will just get on with making Wikipedia better. Si Trew (talk)


 * Thanks for that. I would not expect usually a reply so quickly, so it just caught me by surprise you had assessed etc. so quickly. Of course, quite rightly, the articles are assessed differently from different perspectives. We are stuffing in the battle now. I've anglicised the battle maps (and at the other articles too) which does not help you much, I expect, in Croat, I have blank versions after deleting the text and finessing the rivers etc that they covered, if that is any use to you. Later I will probably make a new SVG version where the text is on a separate layer, but right now we are concentrating on translating the content. Si Trew (talk) 13:04, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

Klapa Fa Lindo
Hi Gregor B. Just did a new article- Klapa Fa Lindo. Any chance of a copyedied, hope this is Ok? Hope you had a good Xmas. Sir Floyd (talk) 01:45, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Re: Croatian presidential election, 2009–2010
I know, but I figured that the GA review backlog is long enough for this to happen naturally :) And the article as it is complies with GA standards better than some existing ones, even with the implicit volatility. --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 13:00, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Music Biennale Zagreb
You're welcome! Nice work. For future reference you might want to copy these onto your user page or work page. They are filtered down so any image you find under them are freely uploadable to the commons if you provide the correct license/attribution:


 * Flickr 2.0
 * Flickr 2.0 sa
 * Geograph UK and Ireland
 * Picasaweb
 * Everystockphoto

The first one, Flick 2.0 is generally the most resourceful one which I use 90% above all the others.. Like here.. Dr. Blofeld       White cat 18:45, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Badnjak?
Do you happen to have any information on the history of badnjak? It would be greatly appreciated if you could help. --Jesuislafete (talk) 02:28, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Speedy tagging
Hi. Thanks for tagging Marci Anne Beggs just now, but after you tag a page for speedy deletion you should copy to the author's talk page the warning which is generated for you on the speedy template, towards the bottom. Otherwise the newbie author doesn't know what's happened, thinks he pressed the wrong button, and often just puts the article in again. Also, if it's a new contributor who has never had a Welcome template, it's useful to give one before the speedy warning - it makes it less BITEy, and gives useful links that may help him do better next time. is a good one. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 19:57, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello GregorB! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 17:59, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Dubravko Šimenc -

Thank you
Thank you for taking the time to comment at Requests for comment/Biographies of living people, which will delete the vast majority of 50,000 articles created by 17,400 editors, most new editors. I notice you have one unreferenced BLP articles, so this RFC affects you personally. I hope you are able to source them before those editors who have "utter contempt" for consensus delete them. You may also be interested in the WP:Article Rescue Squadron. We have been working hard to find sources for the 236 articles which were deleted with no notice by 3 administrators. Ikip 01:29, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Discussion invitation
Ikip 05:06, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

(refactored) Ikip 03:55, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

another invitation
Could you see if you can help here? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Croatia/Zagreb Hvala. :) (LAz17 (talk) 17:58, 31 January 2010 (UTC)).

Epidaurum & Epidaurus (Dalmatia)
Hi GregoryB! How are things? The Epidaurum & Epidaurus (Dalmatia) articles-proposal for merger. What do you think? See Ya! Sir Floyd (talk) 13:21, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your input. :) So GregoryB you think "Epidaurus - Epidaurum - Cavtat" are three different towns? This would mean after each invasion a new town would start up within the area. Hmmm... must be a cool spot, I'll have to check it out one day. Sir Floyd (talk) 22:39, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I've check the photos, it is a cool spot! Also I've quickly check some sources and they suggest that Epidaurus - Epidaurum are one. A new settlement came into being in the middle ages (within the Republic of Ragusa). Sir Floyd (talk) 02:51, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for stopping bye at the Cavtat page. I was hoping you would. You know I always learn something new & Civitas Vetus, that was a nice touch. See Ya! Sir Floyd (talk) 10:05, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Positive definiteness
Your comments are requested on a discussion about whether or not a particular page is a disambiguation page or a stub here. Neelix (talk) 20:05, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Blue Cave (Bisevo)/ Falkusa
Dobar dan Gregor B & kako si? (G-Day & how are you?) I've got a new one, it's the Blue cave in Bisevo (that's if your interested of course). :) Have a good one! Sir Floyd (talk) 03:02, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I like the photo. I'm building another one with Olaf Davis. Its called Falkusa. We'll be needing you latter on. Sir Floyd (talk) 10:28, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Tošo Dabac
Hi. Thanks for noticing the effort invested :-) Yes, I was thinking of nominating the article for DYK, probably with the hook about him working for MGM before having a successful career in photography, but there's some minor stuff to do, such as added bits of information and cleaning up here and there. I don't know whether it would pass the selection process since I've got only one English language source for it, but it's worth trying. Timbouctou (talk) 21:16, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Wow thanks for the IYPCG reference for Dabac. I have no idea how you found it but I'm glad you did :-) Timbouctou (talk) 22:44, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

I wanted to let you know that I've nominated Tošo at the DYK template. You're invited to vote for it. Thanks Timbouctou (talk) 05:38, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:GPS navigation devices
I have nominated gps navigation devices for renaming to global positioning system navigation devices. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:31, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Final discussion for Requests for comment/Biographies of living people
Hello, I note that you have commented on the first phase of Requests for comment/Biographies of living people

As this RFC closes, there are two proposals being considered:
 * 1) Proposal to Close This RfC
 * 2) Alternate proposal to close this RFC: we don't need a whole new layer of bureaucracy

Your opinion on this is welcome. Okip  02:18, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Re: Conjunction or disjunction?
see my response here

Hajdučki kukovi and Rožanski kukovi
Hi GregorB, I've been thinking about merging the Hajdučki kukovi and Rožanski kukovi articles onto National Park Sjeverni Velebit, once both sites are located in the Park. Any sugestion ? Krenakarore (talk) 13:37, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Bacon Deluxe
Thanks for your fixes on the Bacon Deluxe article Gregor. Much appreciated. ChildofMidnight (talk) 17:57, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Alleged Art Scam by unidentified, self-described Israeli art students


The article Alleged Art Scam by unidentified, self-described Israeli art students has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * This redirect is exceedingly unlikely to be used and was the result of a move against consensus

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Smartse (talk) 22:27, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Old City Hall
Hi Gregor, I've created the Old City Hall (Zagreb) article and nominated it for DYK (with a hook saying that the building has a plaque commemorating Tesla's proposal to build a power station). The hook was verified but somebody complained about the lack of inline citations so if you can find any for the plaque or the city hall in general please feel free to add them to the article. I've also created the Museum of Contemporary Art, Zagreb article just now so you can have a look at it and perhaps expand with anything interesting you happen to find about it. Also, good job on the Zagreb synagogue article, I think it could easily receive the good article rating. Have you considered nominating it? Regards.  Timbouctou  (talk) 22:41, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I've created the Marshal Tito Square article, so you can add it to the list :-) As for the 1964 flood I'll try to find some sufficiently detailed information about it and see if it could be turned into an article. The HRT article is weak on actual facts. As for the synagogue, I think it's looking good, perhaps it could do with some copyediting as it feels kind of choppy and perhaps some book references. Blanka also looks good, it seems to me she's ready for GA nomination. In any case, I'm willing to help, we are in dire need of better quality articles related to Zagreb and Croatia. Some sort of organised improvement drives would be great but I've left a message at Zagreb task force talk page and nobody seems to be interested.  Timbouctou  (talk) 07:20, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
 *  Timbouctou  (talk) 10:16, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

William W. Momyer
It may interest you to know that I inserted info about the Tuskegee Airmen into this biography. If I can find any material on his undercutting the Vietnam War effort by insistence on an all-jet Air Force, I will put that in also.

Georgejdorner (talk) 01:58, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

User Fajberglas
Hi Gregor. User Fajberglas recently started constributing to Croatia-related articles, including the creation of Tomislav Karamarko article. However, the person insists on listing Croatia as "place of birth", even though the consensus is to list sovereign countries at the time of person's birth. I've left him a message in his talk page, but he seems stubborn in his ways and he asked for some sort of official policy regulating this. I'm sure there were some discussions about this somewhere but I can't find it so if you would be so kind and look it up and provide links to relevant discussions or at least explain the importance of consensus builing and formatting conventions to him, I'd appreciate it. Thanks man.  Timbouctou  (talk) 19:28, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
 * To tell you the truth, I don't know if there is an official policy at all. But I know someone who is likely to know the answer (User:Evlekis), so I'm going to ask him. Failing that, one can point to a general consensus which is more or less evident (I just randomly chose Vuk Stefanović Karadžić, Slobodan Milošević and Milan Kučan, and all three are conforming.) GregorB (talk) 19:49, 23 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Hello to both of you. This is an interesting point and I believe that there is currently no policy. I, like many, have always favoured historical accuracy for a multitude of reasons and I have found that it is only on a politically driven motive that users (normally IPs) have taken to modern day states. There can be no politics with history, for example, Yugoslavia - in one form or another - can at most cover persons born 1918 to 1991 with the extension to 2006 for Serbia and Montenegro. Before 1918 we have to consider such entities as Kingdom of Serbia, Austria-Hungary, Republic of Venice, Ottoman Empire, Holy Roman Empire etc. and you can see why these details are relevant to each individual. It is pointless listing a person who lived millennia back as being born in Skopje, Republic of Macedonia. If I knew how, I would push for a policy to the point that such amendments would create tags for the Recent Changes watchers to notice (eg. tag: historical details removed). However, there is one way - if you favour either version but not on any political ground - that you can come out on top every time. Consider the following:


 * Mr. XYZ - born Manastir, Ottoman Empire (now Bitola, Republic of Macedonia) on 18 May 1895, died Titograd, SR Montenegro, SFR Yugoslavia (now Podgorica, Montenegro) on 4 August 1986.


 * Here you have information listing everything, so you can use the argument that a user is being disruptive if he removes the historical section, and he cannot claim any kind of "uncluttering" remark because it does not count if he is removing factual information. How does this sound for the time being? User:Evlekis (Евлекис) 03:42, 24 March 2010 (UTC)


 * This is a good point, and I agree: parenthetical remark is both true and useful to a reader who may not be familiar with the historical/geographical/political background. Timbouctou, no worries - I'll write a note to Fajberglas explaining the situation, and I think this is going to work out. GregorB (talk) 08:48, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Glad we have this sorted. I'll keep a few sensitive articles on watchlist. User:Evlekis (Евлекис) 23:09, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Croatian intelligence agencies
First I start to write about Croatian Police, and then i saw this article. The article was terrible, tottaly out of date and with false data. In the next days I will rewrite it, and see what I can do with other articles; some of them probably needs to be deleted, but I don't know how can I delete or propose for deletion? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fajberglas (talk • contribs) 08:08, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Could you please merge and delete those articles. Someone give me a msg that my edits appears to be unconstructive. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fajberglas (talk • contribs) 18:09, 29 March 2010 (UTC)


 * OK, thanks. Please come back to Wiki :)--Fajberglas (talk) 18:44, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

WP:RUN
Since 2006, Wikiproject Running has been improving the coverage of running-related sports on Wikipedia. We could use your help. Currently we are tagging and assessing running related articles including a backlog of articles that we have created over the years before we included assessment parameters in our templates. For details, please check out WP:RUN. Thanks, Racepacket (talk) 10:18, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

GA Review for Klis Fortress
Thanks for copyediting GregorB. Since you are familiar with the subject, your help is very appreciated. I hope we will manage to turn it into good readable prose within seven day. BTW, Zagreb Synagogue article in which you vastly contributed can be a next WikiProject Croatia GA article. If you need assistance, I'd be happy to help. Kebeta (talk) 18:51, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I have seen the recent discussion about Zagreb Synagogue. It seems to me that the article is on the good way to GA, especially with the "mother of all sources". I'd be happy to pitch in when the time comes, and I have noticed that Laurinavicius is also eager to hepl. Regards, Kebeta (talk) 07:59, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Easter Egg for GregorB!
Easter egg for GregorB ! Hope you have a good Easter:) Sir Floyd (talk) 00:50, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of WOF(album)
Hello GregorB, this is a message from an automated bot to inform you that the page you created, WOF(album), has been marked for speedy deletion by User:Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars. This has been done because the page is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer (see CSD). If you think the tag was placed in error, please add " " to the page text, and edit the to explain why the page should not be deleted. If you have a question about this bot, please ask it at User talk:SDPatrolBot II. If you have a question for the user who tagged the article, see User talk:Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars. Thanks, - SDPatrolBot II (talk) on behalf of 04:03, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Barnstar
I happened to notice today that your edit count had long surpassed mine, and instantly thought to myself - I can't let this effort as a whole go unnoticed any further :) --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 12:47, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Dubravko Merlić
You might want to take a look at this one. It was just created today and rather a mess, also pretty much copied from his websites. See and, and  for background. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 18:08, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Congratulations
Congratulations GregorB, great work! Zagreb Synagogue article in which you vastly contributed has been promoted to be a Good Article! I'm really glad I've been able to help! Regards, Kebeta (talk) 09:55, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Great article & great work on the Zagreb Synagogue article, GregorB:). Sir Floyd (talk) 01:22, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Re: List of castles in Croatia
I support the idea and I could help, of course. Let's start! --Silverije (talk) 17:18, 22 April 2010 (UTC)


 * I've read your discussion, of course. It's hard for me to say exactly at the moment whether the plan is fine enough. If not, I hope we can make it better later. --Silverije (talk) 17:43, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Re: Barnstar
Thanks for that, I'm not used to getting all these barnstars! Midway (talk) 23:32, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Ivana Lang
Hello GregorB! (Dobar Dan). I've created Ivana Lang and I would be honoured if you could have a look at it. She seems to be an important Croatian musician.:) Sir Floyd (talk) 14:25, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Zagreb Synagogue
I had not seen that. Thank you. The Zagreb Synagogue is certainly one of the most beautiful. And, of course, no style is ever "pure." Some aspects of Rundbogenstil can indeed be seen in the rows of arched, inverted crenelation, and the tripartie massing. That aid, Franjo Klein tined in Vienna, where Ludwig Förster had recently completed the   Leopoldstädter Tempel. It was the biggest deal synagogue in the capital of the Empire. It features the same rounded arches, the same tripartie massing and the same inverted crenellations. The two also share the emphasis on Moorish detailing, the same interior shape with Moorish patterning, the same minarets and small, decorative accent windows above the arches. Zagreb is widely admired, and widely regarded by its admirers as one or a large number of Moorish revival synagouges of the era that offer homage to Forster's Leopoldstädter Tempel, although Zagreb is an original work that does not copy the Vienna synagogue slavishly. It really is Moorish. If you will look at the range of Rundbogenstil buildings and synagogues, you will see how different the style of the Zagreb synagogue really is. we can probably do a Category:Synagogues that echo the Leopoldstädter Tempel.OldShul (talk) 12:50, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

thanks. I'll do it that way. Putting them in the article. But Later. When I have time to blank the category.OldShul (talk) 13:24, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Just informing you...
Added Klis Fortress for a A-Class review. Since you are familiar with the subject, your help will be very appreciated. Regards, Kebeta (talk) 18:10, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Almost passed. Anyway, thanks for help. Regards, Kebeta (talk) 09:19, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

FYI
Redirects_for_discussion. Pcap ping  03:00, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Šutej
Hey, thanks for the heads up. I'll see and include whatever I can find on him in the stub. I'm sorry for not helping much about the synagogue article but I didn't have time in the past month or so for any wiki work which requires brain activity. Anyway, congratulations for upgrading it to GA :-)  Timbouctou  (talk) 20:17, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Card of Thanks
Thanks for fixing my wikicode. I appreciate the cleanup. kcylsnavS {screech} —Preceding undated comment added 00:06, 16 May 2010 (UTC).

A1 (Croatia)
Hi, I saw you reassessed a number of road related articles, so could you take a look at A1 (Croatia). I expanded it substantially and nominated it, at least I tried to, for DYK - I don't know If class rating has any bearing on that nomination or not, but I figured I'd ask you anyway. Thanks --Tomobe03 (talk) 21:31, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Ciguli Miguli
Wizardman Operation Big Bear 12:04, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Barnstar
Hey man, thanks for the barnstar, I appreciate it. Hope you're fine, see you around! Cheers :-)  Timbouctou  (talk) 14:45, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

RE: Minor planets
Thank you for the template. --Merovingian (T, C, L) 17:10, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

http://www.listening-tests.info/mp3-128-1/results.htm Sebastian mares
McAffee Site Advisor will not let me visit that site which is where a great deal of the CODEC comparison results are. Usually McAffee blocks because of browser hijackings but in this case I'm not sure. Wikipedia isn;t supposed to allow external links to sites which spam or are a security risk. 97.85.185.160 (talk) 01:56, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Dead link for me at the moment. Will try later... GregorB (talk) 07:09, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Still dead - taken offline, obviously. GregorB (talk) 07:07, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

gnutella vs Gnutella
Hi, I've recently done changes to several articles that are about gnutella and related services and clients to change the upper case "Gnutella" occurrences to lower case ones, as this is how gnutella was originally written, before that trend came up to capitalize everything... As an other editor has requested a third party opinion on the matter and as I've seen you have more than one edit in P2P articles on Wikipedia, I thought you might add yours to support my point in this talk page section or in the section below.
 * mfg, OldDeath - 18:29, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Default sort caps changes
Hi, I noticed you change a bunch of default sort tags form "UFC" to "Ufc" with the edit summary "Sort key", could you explain the reasoning behind the caps change, as UFC is an abbreviation for Ultimate Fighting Championship so this seems a little bit of an odd change, thanks --Natet/c 13:41, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Ahh that makes sense now, not that up on how sorting works! Thanks. --Natet/c 12:18, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Requests for mediation/Novak Djokovic
Hi, as I see you are a experienced user from Croatia, so I am kindly asking you to check the Novak Djokovic talk page where users from Serbia are disputing references from Croatian daily newspapers. Are those referenes reliable ones or not? Could you please help solve this problem. Thank you. With regards, --Eversman (talk) 19:41, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:ConTEXT 0.98.3.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:ConTEXT 0.98.3.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 17:58, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

It is illegal appropriation and copying of Croatian texts, Croatian is not Serbo-Croatian or Serbian text

 * Regardless of how each other a little or a lot of different grammar they have some ownership of the language, which were written and what the people who wrote them.
 * Croatian grammar is not Serbian or Serbo-Croatian grammar!
 * Serbs ilegal copying and appropriation of Croatian texts and marking them the Serbian term (Serbo-Croatian) is the criminal !
 * Why Serbian collaborators constantly deleted Croatian scientific texts or false. Example of deleting Croatian grammar and maliciously redirect the Serbo-Croatian, which is valid for the Croatian language!
 * 1) Term Serbo-Croatian is not Croatian; Languales of Croatia!
 * 2) Term Serbo-Croatian this is a Serbian nationalist term, who speak for the illegal appropriation of Croatian texts !
 * 3) Serbian language and Croatian language is two differentes languages !
 * 4) Croatian grammar 1604. (Croat Bartol Kašić, Croatia island Pag - city Dubrovnik form Croatia)
 * 5) Croatian grammar 1997. Dragutin Raguž for Zagreb, Croatia
 * 6) New Croatian grammar 2010. Stjepan Babić, Zagreb Croatia
 * Serbian language and Croatian language is two indepedente languages
 * Croatian and Serbian two legal languages
 * History language map of Europe 1901. Croatian language and Serbian language is two differents languages
 * Modern Slavic language map of Europe 2010. Croatian language and Serbian language is two differents languages —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.15.179.232 (talk) 19:49, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Croatian and Serbian are different languages in a sense that they both have distinct, independent and more or less well-defined language standards. In this context, you are correct that they are different regardless of how small the difference is.
 * However, that simply doesn't mean that it would make sense to create a four-way fork with Bosnian grammar, Croatian grammar, Montenegrin grammar and Serbian grammar. Grammar is the area where differences are really small, unlike lexicon and orthography (where differences are still small). Creating a single article is a consequence of what makes sense and what doesn't, and not what is identical and what isn't. It is not a some kind of "verdict". GregorB (talk) 07:12, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

The article "Art Student Scam" on Administrator's board which you were involved in discussing on the articlesfordeletion page in early march
Hi. Do you agree that a group of users with strong political bias was ganging up on you and other wikipedia users on the articlesfordeletion page for the Article "Art Student Scam" with the purpose of distorting facts for political reasons. Also, do you agree that they acted to completely distort the topic of israeli spying in favor of the almost unnotable topic - chinese men selling fake art on the street that they say is real. Third, do you agree that user:huey45 is acting in "bad faith" and lying when he repeatedly claims that the sources say "the art students weren't israelis" and when user:gilisa claims that the most of the sources are unreliable and that user:huey45 is not lying. These users, who are deliberately trying to distort the contents of sources are also trying to get my account banned because they claim that huey45 is not lying.Preciseaccuracy (talk) 09:49, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

User huey45 says....


 * "I never once lied in regards to this issue. When I said "the previous sources", I was referring to the sources that were presented before User:Preciseaccuracy turned up and started causing trouble. What do you think the word "previous" means? When the article was about the Israeli art students last time, there was considerable doubt as to the real nationality of these salesmen. (Huey45 (talk) 06:14, 16 July 2010 (UTC)) "

user:huey45 is clearly acting in "bad faith" Preciseaccuracy (talk) 09:55, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Link

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Huey45_acting_in_.E2.80.9Cbad_faith.E2.80.9D_and_colluding_with_others_to_sabotage_article_.E2.80.9CArt_Student_Scam.E2.80.9D

Preciseaccuracy (talk) 10:02, 16 July 2010 (UTC)


 * My impressions were as follows:
 * Strong political bias was definitely present in the discussion
 * Distortion took place mostly in the form of whitewashing, i.e. by attempting to remove all references to Israel, contrary to what sources said. A nice example: a six-page Salon article does not count and cannot be used as a source because it received a perfunctory, three-sentence "debunking" by the Washington Post.
 * Regarding conduct of individual editors, I can't say that I noticed anyone in particular acting in bad faith. Off the top of my head, I don't have an opinion on conduct of two users you mentioned, but I'll check the link provided above. GregorB (talk) 10:09, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Other editors still make the claim that the israeli "art student" spying was an "urban myth." They will not even admit that this labeling is at least controversial. Whereas in reality, the israeli "art student" spy ring seemed to be at least "suspected."

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Preciseaccuracy (talk • contribs) 10:10, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

I left this abc 20/20 article out of the discussion because it doesn't mention the "art students" specifically but does confirm that at least two known israeli spies were found to be in the u.s. illegally in 2001. They would probably say that 20/20 is not a credible or mainstream source either. I suggest that you read through this source also to verify that at least two israeli spies were found in the u.s working for a moving company that disappeared.

http://abcnews.go.com/2020/story?id=123885&page=1

Preciseaccuracy (talk) 10:59, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

The Washington post in its debunking also admitted that it didn't even bother to obtain the 60 pg. dea memo. Preciseaccuracy (talk) 12:43, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

The 20/20 article seems to be only related to israeli organized spying and not directly to the art students so I'm leaving it out of the discussion. Preciseaccuracy (talk) 13:09, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

My edit at your talk page
Hello, I removed copy right violation from you talk page. It is explained here. Thanks.--Mbz1 (talk) 01:44, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Table Tennis
I founded the WikiProject Table Tennis. I noticed you are inserting the Table Tennis stub template in several pages... are you interested in collaboration with the WikiProject Table Tennis?

DYK for Sandra Perković
 — Rlevse • Talk  • 00:02, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

help
I worked some more on this page, Croatian Inline Hockey League, can you maybe find the 2009 season winners? I'll take care of the team pages, but I can't find last season's results. Maybe there was no season in 2009? Yours truly, (LAz17 (talk) 20:31, 15 August 2010 (UTC)).
 * Any competition can be a league ya know. :) Championships sounds kinda wrong/creepy. Could you find some 2009 result of the winners? (LAz17 (talk) 03:45, 17 August 2010 (UTC)).
 * Oh yeah, you're awesome man. There seems to be nothing that you can not find some info about. :) I'll see what I can do from here on out, I have a person who I could ask. Thanks! (LAz17 (talk) 11:48, 17 August 2010 (UTC)).

Ivan Ivančić

 * Very nice work on Ivan Ivančić, thank you very much. --Ghaly (talk) 21:09, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your reply and the nomination. --Ghaly (talk) 08:32, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Congratulations and thank you very much for all your hard work and developing the article. --Ghaly (talk) 20:47, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

WP Croatia
Sure and it's my pleasure - always happy to be of assistance. :-) -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 16:17, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. i hope eventually they will be expanded.Starzynka (talk) 17:31, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Ivan Ivančić
The DYK project (nominate) 18:03, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Re: TC Barnstar
Thank you for the barnstar! Your feedback as well as feedback from other wikipedians, especially Joy were real incentives and help.--Tomobe03 (talk) 15:07, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

PR for A1 (Croatia)
Hi! I have posted A1 (Croatia) article for peer review and hwy peer review as I'd like to improve it sufficiently for GAN at least. I also posted a copyedit request at GOCE and it should be done in October (presumably after additional peer reviews are in). I'd appreciate it if you could have a look at the article and post any comments. Thanks--Tomobe03 (talk) 15:17, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
Armbrust Talk  Contribs  12:23, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Luka Kaliterna
Hi GregorB! I have seen that you have put a 'BLP unreferenced' on the top of Luka Kaliterna article. Is that a mistake since he died in 1984, or that is a usual tag for biography of a person (dead or alive) ? Kebeta (talk) 18:06, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
 * That's because you are to fast:-) BTW, you can take a look on this, maybe next WikiProject Croatia GA article. Kebeta (talk) 18:16, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
 * What can I say, I like infoboxes :-) Kebeta (talk) 21:48, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Pending changes/Straw poll on interim usage
Hi. As you recently commented in the straw poll regarding the ongoing usage and trial of Pending changes, this is to notify you that there is an interim straw poll with regard to keeping the tool switched on or switching it off while improvements are worked on and due for release on November 9, 2010. This new poll is only in regard to this issue and sets no precedent for any future usage. Your input on this issue is greatly appreciated. Off2riorob (talk) 23:35, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Populated places
Hey GregorB, I hope all is well. I've been moving articles in the Category:Populated places in Croatia category and putting them into categories by county, and I've done about 600 of them so far, with 400 more to go. I also played with the idea of creating a template such as this for every county, which would list all populated places in each county. Helpful ideas are welcome. Cheers.  Timbouctou  08:46, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Template:BridgesCompletedCenturyCat
Hello, could you expand the template to the centuries BC so that I can add the Rhodes Footbridge? Thanks in advance. Gun Powder Ma (talk) 22:36, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Check this!
Check this! Interesting...Kebeta (talk) 13:14, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I agree completely with you.... BTW, have you seen changes by Krenakarore on Walls of Dubrovnik? Since I am subjective on that topic, I was wondering what do you think, are they better or worse? Kebeta (talk) 19:13, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Re: Siege of Trsat
I wouldn't care about offline sources, as everything from them is already used in the article. The main problem is - lack of more precise informations. But, we can not speculate and write something which is not supported by sources. There is nothing that I or you can do about that. That leads us to a second problem - lack of more precise informations leaves room for substantial confusion. We should consecrate on this issue. If you could made article more simple to understand, that would be great. If the article was one sided, we wouldn't have this problem. Since I didn't want to exclude other possibilities from the article, we have a situation where things looks confusing for a new reader. My plan is to make things more clearer from the facts already presented in the article. Unfortunately, my limited English could be an obstacle in that. Regards, Kebeta (talk) 10:38, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
 * OK, I already clarified some things, such as Trsat vs Tarsatica, and so on...I am not sure if Diannaa can help here (she would have to know the topic it self, not only English), since copyediting is not an issue any more (although I agree that she deserves a barnstar). See you on the article's talk page. Kebeta (talk) 11:41, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Siege of Trsat is GA. ✅...this was quick a job by JonCatalán! Congratulation!
 * Yeah...but you must be quick, as I already called Diannaa. Kebeta (talk) 15:17, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
 * But I would like her (Diannaa) to help with the Battle of Szigetvár. If she manage to copyedit that article, we could give it another chance for GA. What do you think? Kebeta (talk) 15:22, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

GA within WP Croatia

 * I am not so pessimistic about Battle of Szigetvár. For #4 I provided both: from 19th century & modern scholarly references (ie after World War II) for for the number of troops (if necessary I could provide more). If all other points are fixed, with copyediting as a final touch, there would be no problem.
 * Informal process of "GA candidature" within WP Croatia sounds good, the lack of editors for such a task in questionable. Tomobe03 looks very promising.
 * To bring Lastovo and Blanka Vlašić to GA is very interesting. But, Lastovo will be much harder, even as a former FA. Kebeta (talk) 17:34, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
 * No I will not nominate Battle of Szigetvár soon, because I am also willing to help with Tvrđa. One GA within WP Croatia per month is something we should try to accomplish. :-) Regarding the informal process of "GA candidature" within WP Croatia - the creation of page within WP Croatia would be a nice start? Kebeta (talk) 18:15, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, I agree with you. Regards, Kebeta (talk) 18:55, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Cite template
Hi! I've noticed you have changed formatting of some inline citations in A1 (Croatia) articles from "cite web" to "cite journal" and added some parameters to them. I tried but could not find any reference to other possible cite parameters, so could you point me to those so I could use them as well. I emulated the citation format for HUKA bulletins in A3 (Croatia) and A6 (Croatia) which I plan to submit to GAN after a copyedit (no volunteers there yet) but I am wondering if there is anything else I should implement. Thanks.--Tomobe03 (talk) 15:12, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Works perfectly and sure came in handy for the A4 (Croatia) expansion... thanks!--Tomobe03 (talk) 11:54, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

Infobox gives a bad impression of Croats....
Wustefuchs started a discussion about this at WP Croatia here. Kebeta (talk) 18:01, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

North-south to east-west?
Hi! A copyeditor pointed out on the Talk:A6 (Croatia) that the A6 motorway is an east-west road while the article specifies the northern and the southern termini. I must admit that is a valid argument, but the legislation (regulation on motorway chainage) specifies that the zero chainage starts at Bosiljevo 2 and that all Croatian motorways chainages start at either the northern or the western terminus - thus it follows that Bosiljevo 2 is the northern terminus. I am thinking about having the article say that the route is an east-west motorway and referencing everything else on the route as east or west of some reference point, but retaining the northern and the southern designation for the termini, plus a short passage in the route description section and a short sentence in the exit list noting and explaining this situation. Do you have any better suggestions, or should I go ahead with this? Thanks!--Tomobe03 (talk) 12:49, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Choice of title for HUKA
Hi! I just finished expanding the A4 (Croatia) and realized that an awfully lot of references point to HUKA and it occurred to me that it might be handy to have an article on that. Now, that should not be much of a problem, and I'm ready to do it, but I'm unsure whether to have its title Hrvatska udruga koncesionara za autoceste s naplatom cestarine or Croatian Association of Toll Motorways Concessionaires. Naturally, I'd create a redirect from HUKA to the full title, whichever that is, as well. Which would you recommend?--Tomobe03 (talk) 11:54, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

WP Croatia todo list
My pleasure. And thank you.--Wustefuchs (talk) 11:57, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Battle of Szigetvár
I've begun the copy edit process which was requested by another editor to the page, and substantially completed the lead section and the next two sections. There was much confusion, repetition and unneccessary detail which I removed. However, some of the text was so confusing that I had to guess at the true meaning and may have goofed in my interpretations. You and other main contributers may want to verify my work and make corrections. I'll do some more later. --Kevin Murray (talk) 03:21, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Merciline Jayakody
Dear friend, could you please assists me to solve Problem of this Article Talk:Merciline Jayakody/Temp--Wipeouting (talk) 15:50, 31 October 2010 (UTC) I am trying to avoid this problem. If it is possible could you pleas rewrite it?--Wipeouting (talk) 17:37, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Hello
Regarding AfD 3 of Kresimir Chris Kunej, just wanted to say that you have yet again proved that old saying "Tko ce koga nego svoj svoga". The subject is one of a rare few Croatian articles, part of Wikiproject Croatia. Also, some editors made fun of Croatia indirectly by saying "just because some library half way around the world has his works means nothing" (we are talking National and University Library Zagreb), and after AfD 1 same editor was talking with friends and making fun saying how "subject is notable in Pakistan" thereby equating Croatia to Pakistan. You played into their games, good job, be proud of youself. Turqoise 127  03:00, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
 * What's wrong with Pakistan? It has a population 37 times that of Croatia but a GDP only 2.4 times that of Croatia. Are you casting aspersions on large, but relatively poor, countries? Bongo  matic  03:43, 1 November 2010 (UTC)


 * As if the previous stuff was not enough, this guy now pulls a provocation right here in plain sight. Oh my. Turqoise 127  23:55, 1 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Croats in general tend to be obsessed with proving the importance of their country to third parties and comparing Croatia to Pakistan is sure to hit a patriotic chord every now and then (for instance, Croatia's economic performance was recently compared to that of Turkmenistan by the MMF, and the comparison itself was a main talking point in the media for days to come, much more so than the negative economic indicators which were published months earlier by Croatian institutions). Turqoise here is just trying to play the patriotic card on a fellow Croatian editor somehow equating the Kunej article with patriotism in general. I also might add that there are some 6,000+ of the "rare few Croatian articles, part of Wikiproject Croatia" he refers to, the majority of which have no notability issues. Being a Croat and a professional translator myself, I find this kind of canvassing a bit out of order.  Timbouctou  19:07, 1 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Hey, philosopher, if you find this a bit out of order dont read it, it was not addressed to you. Turqoise 127  23:55, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Hat trick
Thanks! I guess the task gets easier with experience. Right now I plan to do a similar thing for the A2 and A7 as soon as I finish a major dayjob project - I'm editing a bit less often lately - but decent and free images of those are hard to find.--Tomobe03 (talk) 18:13, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Kresimir Chris Kunej (3rd nomination)
Hi GregorB. Of the participants at Articles for deletion/Kresimir Chris Kunej (2nd nomination), you are the only one who hasn't participated, or been notified, about Articles for deletion/Kresimir Chris Kunej (3rd nomination). Cunard (talk) 07:35, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Replied on my talk page. Cunard (talk) 08:16, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Libertas (film)
Hello! Your submission of Libertas (film) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   16:57, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

SERBO-CROATIAN GRAMMAR IS NOT CROATIAN GRAMMAR

 * THE PAGE IS NOT CROATIAN GRAMMAR. (IS NOT GRAMMAR CROATIAN STANDARD LANGUAGE)
 * CROATIAN LANGUAGE NOT SPELLED CHIRILIC. (CROATIAN IS EXCLUSIVE LATIN ALPHABET. Croats do not understand chirilic read.)
 * CROATIAN LANGUAGE NOT BE WRITTEN IN BRACKETS. (CROATIAN WRITTEN COREKT: "VRIJEME" / NOT COREKT VR(IJE)ME) AND (CROATIAN TO SPEAK COREKT: "VRIEME").
 * Croatian dictionary differs from the Serbian 30% or 1/3 words.
 * This page is false and offensive to speakers of the Croatian language.
 * CROATIAN:tjedan,vojarna,vlak...(150 000 Croatian words is different from Serbian) / SERBIAN:sedmica,kasarna,voz... /ENGLISH:week, barracks, train... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.131.37.198 (talk) 08:44, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Please direct your comments to the article's discussion page and not to individual editors (who are marginally involved, in this particular case). GregorB (talk) 09:54, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Libertas (film)
Cbl62 (talk) 18:06, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Maths rating
I noticed you added a maths rating template to the article Future of mathematics. When you add the template, please fill in all three of the fields,  , and. We already have a List of mathematics articles that does not require any talk page tags, so there is no need to tag a talk page just to indicate that an article is mathematics related. The only purpose of the tag is for ratings information. &mdash; Carl (CBM · talk) 22:48, 22 November 2010 (UTC)


 * The count of mathematics articles is at WikiProject Mathematics/Count, where it is updated by a bot, which again does not require any talk page tags. We also have WikiProject Mathematics/Current activity which ... you can guess.


 * If we wanted to add the tags to talk pages, we could run a bot job that would add them to every math article very quickly. We have avoided doing that because the point of the template is just for ratings, not for tagging. So yes, we are different than other projects. If you don't feel comfortable adding the rating info, that's perfectly fine. But there's no benefit to adding the template without it, because we have a system in place that allows us to do perfectly well even if our talk page tag was deleted from every article. &mdash; Carl (CBM · talk) 23:24, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

ref order
Would you please explain to me the reasons behind edits like this one? I nearly always have good solid reasons for the order in which I footnote my sources, but people are constantly coming along and moving the most recent ref to the front, as though my reasons are nothing compared to the imperative of having them in reverse chronological order. I just don't understand it. Hesperian 12:01, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Ah, so it's about having the footnote numbers in ascending order, is it? That at least makes some sense. Hesperian 12:46, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Congratulations
Tvrđa is a GA. Regards, Kebeta (talk) 10:49, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Unreferenced means no references
Please do not tag articles like this. There is a very good reference in the article, it is just listed as an external link. no footnotes andBLP sources would have been more appropriate tags to add. Regards, The-Pope (talk) 05:52, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I know that technically you were right, but the rules are vague, ambiguous and nothing is going to suit all situations. If it was an IMDB link, or a probably reliable, but related party (such as employer, sporting organisation, government or faculty) website, I wouldn't have contacted you, and may have even left it as is, with the unref tag.  If it was an obviously unreliable source, then I'd agree with you. I tend to use the "what would a newbie editor" think approach.  If I had created that article, and put that ref in, but put it as a ext link, not an inline ref, because I didn't know better, then what would I think if I saw that tag?  I'd think you must be blind and would remove it, or think this is all too hard and leave.  The more informative tags actually acknowledge that, yes, there is a ref, but you haven't formatted it correctly or put it inline.  It might actually encourage some improvement, rather than frightening people away. Regards, The-Pope (talk) 11:31, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Expand
Template:Expand has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. 134.253.26.6 (talk) 22:46, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Twelve Generals' Letter
Materialscientist (talk) 00:03, 21 December 2010 (UTC)