User talk:Gregory311

May 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block.

Also the use of multiple accounts to edit the article is against our policies. A much better course of action would be to explain your point of view on Talk:High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program. Thank you. LuckyLouie (talk) 17:16, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

No problem. I'm assuming the same person that took down my contribution to this page is getting this same message. I don't know who it is, but I'm pretty sure it's a person from a guerilla team that changes things on Wikipedia whenever they want and to suit their particular needs. The citation I originally put up, that was immediately edited out, was from a US congressional sub-committee panel that took place last week and is available on youtube. I suppose there's no sense in sharing anything anymore as this person will likely just take it down or have one of his comrades do so. And apparently that's OK to do, just not when others do it.

As for multiple accounts, wikipedia locked me out of it and I forgot I had an old one. Did not mean to break any rules.

Thanks for your email - my apologies for troubling you. Take care!


 * You need to take the advice to start a discussion. I don't understand why you think it is irrelevant (and I don't think it should be discussed here, discussions need to be on the article talk page where everyone can see them). Dougweller (talk) 18:29, 22 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Sorry, clicked save too soon. You should also read WP:AGF - your comment about a guerilla team is really out of line and won't help you. Dougweller (talk) 18:30, 22 May 2014 (UTC)