User talk:Gregory k

Unhelpful edits
Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. WjBscribe 05:25, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Unconstructive edits to Markos Moulitsas
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Chris Cunningham 08:31, 9 July 2007 (UTC)


 * (AP story 04/21/2000, as copied in The Fresno Bee): "...he (Moulitsas) consistantly refuses to define his sexuality, perhaps owing to his continued military service (in the inactive Reserves)...." Please expedite the restoration of my edit.  Many thanks,  gregory_k


 * If you can find a link to this article then feel free to discuss it. I don't see that a seven-year-old article which predates his marriage and children is indicative of his current position. Chris Cunningham 21:10, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

With all do respect, I do not view an individual's sexual orientation as "unconstructive" when it is not exclusively heterosexual. Neither do I view orientation as as synonymous with heterosexual marital status: nor would Charles Laughton, Anthony Perkins, Elton John, or any other queer man married to a woman. Please restore the edit. Many thanks, gregory_k


 * I'm not restoring an edit which says in the current tense that the man "refuses to define his sexuality" when (a) I haven't seen the reference myself, (b) the reference is seven years old, and (c) the subject's situation has changed dramatically. As I say, if you can provide a way for others to examine this reference, then please go to Talk:Markos Moulitsas and suggest having it added to the article. For my part, I apologise for accusing you of vandalism. Chris Cunningham 08:33, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Huell Howser
I am thinking of doing a major re-write of this article. If you can find a legitimate source of his membership in the repbulcian party (not just a member of the log cabin rebuplican's but of just the Republican Party) then it can be included. My search of lexis nexis and the LA times database came up with no stance of his politically, except for his defense of the Long Beach Naval Station. He doesn't seem to be a very political person in a way that meets WP:V. I have begun a discussion on Talk:Huell Howser if you have any other opinion on this. Thanks. XinJeisan 15:34, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Reason for block
You were blocked because you have repeatedly and despite warnings added defamatory and potentially libellous statements to articles on Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not the place for rumors, personal intuitions, or other statements not substantiated by reference to reliable published sources, especially on articles related to living persons. —Centrx→talk &bull; 17:36, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Dear Centrx:

I have yet to hear from you, re: your arbitrary block on my contributions. I can only assume your failure to respond stems from your inability to refute the accuracy of my initial postings.

Therefore, please restore said edits ASAP, or you will force me to forward the history of our correspondence-- or lack of same--to the HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN, for possible action.

Many Thanks,

gregory_k —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Gregory k (talk • contribs).