User talk:Gregrutz

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.  Ϣere Spiel  Chequers 06:32, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style
 * Also feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.

Please stop
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

Please stop removing content and blanking sections. Your actions at Cambrian explosion, Uniformitarianism (science), Tiktaalik, Homo habilis and Evolutionary history of life have been reverted. Your actions are damaging to Wikipedia. If you have a good reason for removing content, please use the edit summary. If you keep deleting content without apparent reasons, I will ask an admin to block your account. Woodwalker (talk) 06:56, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

This edit to Evolutionary_history_of_life was vandalism - stop it or you will be blocked. --Philcha (talk) 06:39, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Hello ,

it seems that all of your edits so far are controversial. Please propose what you want to do first on the talk page and discuss it first. It looks like you are trying to remove anything slightly negative about evolution. Wikipedia keeps a neutral point of view. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:09, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The assumption he removed this morning might indeed be outdated (I'd have to check literature to be sure), however, mentioning creationism in an article about evolution is in itself not neutral. I don't think he intended his edit as advertisement for creationism though :-). This edit seems to be okay, but the others are probably not. Woodwalker (talk) 10:06, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

April 2013
This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia without further notice. — raeky  t  06:33, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Please use edit summaries to explain your edits. Doing so will help avoid being reverted due to mis-interpretation of your intent. Thanks, Vsmith (talk) 09:54, 10 April 2013 (UTC)