User talk:GresLed

December 2020
Funcrunch (talk) 00:59, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Alok Vaid-Menon. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. Funcrunch (talk) 00:59, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Sam Smith, you may be blocked from editing. Funcrunch (talk) 06:35, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. ‑Scottywong | [verbalize] || 03:46, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Request for Unblock, with My Submitted Rehabilitation Evidence Statement

 * Thanks for your heartfelt explanation. One question I have for you: in the time since you were blocked, did you use any alternate accounts or edit Wikipedia anonymously?  —&#8288;Scotty Wong &#8288;— 00:04, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Thank-you so much for the response. The answer to your questions is no I haven’t used alternate accounts at all or attempted to edit Wikipedia anonymously. GresLed (talk) 04:43, 9 February 2023 (UTC)